Legislature(2015 - 2016)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/16/2016 03:00 PM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB118 | |
| HB373 | |
| SB55 | |
| HB41 | |
| HB290 | |
| HB41 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 373 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE BILL NO. 55
"An Act relating to the practice of optometry."
3:28:33 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for SB 55(FIN), Work Draft 29-LS0524\G (Bruce,
4/13/16).
Co-Chair MacKinnon OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
3:28:58 PM
ERIN SHINE, STAFF, SENATOR ANNA MACKINNON, explained that
the cs incorporated the amendments adopted by the committee
during the April 15, 2016 meeting:
Page 1, line 12:
Delete "by agreement with the State Medical Board,"
Co-Chair MacKinnon REMOVED her OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
3:29:35 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche discussed the fiscal note attached to
the legislation:
CSSB 55(L&C) expands the practice of optometrists to
include additional prescriptive authority, with the
prescription of controlled substances limited to a
seven-day supply. It authorizes the board to establish
in regulation licensee continuing education standards,
prescriptive standards, and the scope of practice to
perform ophthalmic surgery and noninvasive procedures.
If the bill passes the division will require $2.5 to
cover legal costs to amend regulations, printing, and
postage in the first year.
Professional licensing programs within the Division of
Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing are
funded by Receipt Supported Services, fund source 1156
Rcpt Svcs (DGF). Licensing fees for each occupation
are set per AS 08.01.065 so the total amount of
revenue collected approximately equals the
occupation's actual regulatory costs.
3:30:54 PM
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, SPONSOR, stated that she was
satisfied with the committee substitute. She relayed that
the bill would update the statutes governing the practice
of optometry in the state, and would authorize the board to
continue regulating the practice of optometry in the state.
3:31:39 PM
Co-Chair Kelly spoke to public testimony that had
referenced an optometry school in Washington State.
Senator Giessel clarified that an eye surgeon had testified
that he had been denied acceptance to a school of optometry
in Washington State. She said that there is not now, nor
had there ever been a school of optometry in Washington
State or in Washington D.C.
Co-Chair MacKinnon stated that the public hearing had
closed on April 14, 2016.
3:32:34 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche wondered whether the changes in the
current bill version allowed for optometrists to perform
surgery.
3:33:56 PM
DR. JEFF GONNASON, ALASKA OPTOMETRY, KENAI (via
teleconference), explained that under the new definition
optometrists scope of practice would be determined and
authorized by the board. He said that the old definition
allowed for minor surgeries to be performed, but nothing
invasive. He stated that under the legislation the board
would be able to determine the scope of practice, while
still protecting the public. He asserted that legislators
were not equipped to make decisions on the details of
medical procedures, which was why regulatory boards
existed.
3:36:28 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche referred to the limitation of practice
in the bill, and wondered whether it was similar to the
same provision in dentistry.
Dr. Gonnason agreed with the comparison. He noted that
Section 5 of the bill stated that no licensee could perform
an act beyond their level of training and qualification. He
reiterated that the board existed to protect the public.
3:37:27 PM
Senator Olson referred to Page 2, line 18 of the bill:
* Sec. 4. AS 08.72.272 is amended by adding new
subsections to read:
(e) A licensee may not perform an injection in
the ocular globe of the eye that is a derivative
of clostridium botulinum.
Senator Olson expressed concern that the language could be
interpreted to read that licensees were allowed to give
injections into the ocular globe as long as it was not
clostridium botulinum.
Dr. Gonnason responded that no one injected clostridium
botulinum into the eye; it simply was not done. He thought
that the language had been written into the document
because of the fear that botox injections were being
administered, which was not the case. He added that the
provision would not need to be in statute, the board would
put it in regulation. He stated that optometrists did not
administer injections into the eye. He explained that due
to increasing demand, ophthalmologists would eventually
need assistance for injecting drugs for macular
degeneration, and were currently training nurses to perform
the procedure.
3:39:31 PM
Senator Olson wanted assurances that optometrists did not
inject anything into the globe of the eye.
Dr. Gonnason replied in the affirmative.
3:39:48 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche MOVED to report CSSB 55(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
CSSB 55(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with one previously published fiscal
impact note: FN1 (CED).
3:40:18 PM
AT EASE
3:42:09 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 55 AOA AKOMA Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 Public Testimony Morris.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 ASPS NWSPS Comments - Scope Optometric - AK SB55 - 04-15-16.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| HB 118 - PACE Legislation Steele.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 118 |
| SB 55 Opposition Letter Reinhardt.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 work draft version G.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |