Legislature(2013 - 2014)BUTROVICH 205
02/25/2014 01:30 PM Senate TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB53 | |
| SB177 | |
| SB178 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 53 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| * | SB 177 | ||
| * | SB 178 | ||
SB 53-AIRCRAFT EMERGENCY RATIONS AND EQUIPMENT
CHAIR EGAN announced SB 53 to be up for consideration.
DAVID SCOTT, staff to Senator Donald Olson, sponsor of SB 53,
said the aviation industry asked Senator Olson to introduce this
bill to update statutes to current industry standards that
require more sophisticated safety and locator equipment. Section
1 adds some conforming language relative to section 2 that is
new language saying the requirements under (a) in section 1 do
not apply to an operator if they are following Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) requirements known in the maritime industry
as an emergency position indicating radio beacon (EPIRB) and in
the aviation industry as an emergency locating transmitter
(ELT).
1:34:25 PM
SENATOR FAIRCLOUGH asked how the language is being interpreted
differently now.
1:34:40 PM
MR. SCOTT said the language is ambiguous as to whether it
applies to an aircraft that did not start its flight in Alaska
and will not end its flight in Alaska but travels through
Alaskan airspace.
SENATOR FAIRCLOUGH said it seems like they are proposing to not
require an airplane to carry lifesaving equipment and asked what
kind they carry now.
MR. SCOTT answered if there is ever an incident an ELT would
activate and emergency operations would get there very quickly -
weather permitting.
SENATOR FAIRCLOUGH said she was thinking about the life safety
of passengers on board any particular aircraft and whether it's
good to have this equipment on the aircraft and if so, in what
quantity. She understood there was a cost of fuel in carrying
excess weight and replacement of food that ages.
1:37:31 PM
JANE DALE, Alaska Air Carriers Association, Willow, Alaska,
supported SB 53, saying it updates statutes with current
technology and practices.
1:39:04 PM
BOB HAJDUKOVICH, President and CEO, Era Alaska, Fairbanks,
Alaska, supported SB 53. He said there has been a lot of
ambiguity in this law for years, but it was never taken out of
context until a couple of years ago when the FAA started to
interpret the state law in addition its regulations and started
questioning air carriers that were flying over the state's air
space as to why they were not in compliance with state law. He
explained that state troopers had never enforced the law by
inspecting aircraft for survival equipment and that the original
intent was to capture non-commercial pilots flying up from the
Lower 48 to prepare them for surviving for a week in Alaska if
they had to put their plane down somewhere here. As things
evolved, the concepts of satellite technology and 406 ELTs that
are activated on impact have reduced that worry. Today, the
major issue is accessibility to the accident scene.
This issue came up because the FAA was specifically holding ERA
accountable for their Dash 8 equipment, which has 37 seats, and
requiring them to carry a sleeping bag per person. When asked if
Alaska Airlines, China Airways, and anybody else that flies into
the Anchorage airport have to be in compliance with the same law
they were told yes. So, Era took it all the way to Washington,
D.C., and was told that it was between them and the FAA, that
carriers still need to be in compliance with their state's law.
That's when they started trying to clarify this law.
MR. HAJDUKOVICH said it's still smart for private pilots in
small aircraft to carry survival gear and it's also smart for
them to have a 406 ELT. If they do have an ELT, waiving other
requirements would be a fair tradeoff, because the best thing
that has been done for aviation safety in the last 50 years has
been being able to immediately locate a downed aircraft.
His only question was possibly defining "real time" in relation
to satellite tracking systems in subsection (d). Items
(1),(2),(3), and (4) have some redundancy and item (1) could
potentially exempt aircraft from carrying survival equipment if
there is a void in FAA requirement, so he thought that language
could be tightened up.
MR. SCOTT said the sponsor was willing to look at those and
tweak language if necessary.
1:44:27 PM
MIKE STEDMAN, co-owner, Alaska Seaplanes, Juneau, Alaska,
supported SB 53. He was also on the Air Carrier Board and said
with the advent of automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast
(ADS-B), real time tracking of downed aircraft has been greatly
enhanced in the last few years.
SENATOR DYSON remembered the requirement to carry a firearm and
how that caused some trouble when flying into Canada and asked
if that was still a requirement.
MR. SCOTT directed attention to AS 02.35.110(a) that had a list
of requirements and said a rifle was not it.
1:46:37 PM
SENATOR FRENCH asked someone to describe what the FAA requires
for operations within the state over uninhabited areas, since it
goes away if the aircraft is equipped as required by the FAA.
MR. SCOTT answered 14 CFR 121.353 entitled "Emergency Equipment
for Operations over Uninhabited Terrain" listed those
requirements.
SENATOR FRENCH read: pyrotechnic devices, survival type
emergency locator transmitter, and survival kits appropriately
equipped for the route to be flown and the number of occupants
on the airplane and asked if there was more of a description for
the survival kit, because that could be interpreted as having a
Cliff Bar for everybody, but no blankets or snow shoes, fire
starter, knife, mosquito netting - nothing.
MR. SCOTT said he dug into that but couldn't find out what
"appropriately equipped" meant.
SENATOR FRENCH asked if you are equipped as in (d)(1)(2)(3)(4),
do you have to have each one of those things to escape the
requirements of (a) or just any one of them.
MR. SCOTT said he interpreted them as "or."
SENATOR FRENCH also remarked that there was an "and" on line 20
and that lead to his last question, which is that (4) seems to
be a combination of (2) and (3), which seems redundant because
it says a real-time satellite tracking system in (2) and a 406
ELT in (3), but then (4) adds "installed and operational" to
those two pieces of equipment.
SENATOR BISHOP asked if this bill goes to "135 operators."
MR. STEDMAN answered that the word "commercial carrier" is part
135 and part 121.
SENATOR BISHOP asked if an Alaska Airlines 737 was trying to
push back from the gate here in Juneau and either one of those
two wasn't operational, it wouldn't leave until they were?
MR. STEDMAN said that was correct, but the 406 ELTs are not
required for transport category jets.
1:52:07 PM
SENATOR FAIRCLOUGH said if they are going to take the time to
look at this bill further, they probably need to go back into
section 1 and on page 2, line 7, that says a sleeping bag "and"
one wool blanket for the smaller planes and maybe change that to
"or".
She was also wondering why, if they believe the federal
government has set appropriate codes for survival, that they are
not tying FAA requirements directly to this one, so that when it
changes our statutes are automatically updated. "Survival kit"
should be described, because they want to make it easy for a
carrier to provide safety to those on the plane and eliminate
wool blankets and sleeping bags if they are not necessary.
1:54:13 PM
CHAIR EGAN, finding no further questions, said SB 53 would be
held in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 53 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 |
| SB 177 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |
| SB 178 Sectional Analysis.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 178 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 178 Letters Supporting.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 53 Letter of Support - Air Carriers.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 |
| SB 53 Letter of Support - Era 012914.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 |
| SB 53 Fiscal Note, DPS 022214.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 |
| SB 177 Fiscal Note, Admin 022214.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |
| SB 177 Fiscal Note, DCCED 022114.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |
| SB 177 Fiscal Note, DOTPF 022514.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |
| SB 178 Fiscal Note, DOR-Tax 022014.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 178 Petition Supporting 022514.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 53 - 14 CFR 121.353.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 53 |
| SB 178 Letter Supporting - Lentfer 022414.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 178 Letters Supporting - Second Batch.PDF |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 178 |
| SB 177 PCIA Industry Comments 022514.pdf |
STRA 2/25/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 177 |