Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/25/2003 09:06 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 53
"An Act relating to disposition of a traffic offense involving
the death of a person; providing for the revocation of driving
privileges by a court for a driver convicted of a violation of
traffic laws in connection with a fatal motor vehicle or
commercial motor vehicle accident; amending Rules 43 and 43.1,
Alaska Rules of Administration; and providing for an effective
date."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-chair Wilken informed the Committee that this bill would allow
the revocation of a person's driving license in the event that
their traffic violation results in a death.
SENATOR SCOTT OGAN, the sponsor of the bill, explained that current
State statute does not provide provisions to address a traffic
violation that results in a death. He shared that he personally
knows families who have lost a relative or suffered a disability as
the result of another driver running a red light, and he
communicated that the at-fault driver only received a $50 fine for
a traffic violation. He stated that unless a driver is, for
instance, intoxicated, there is no State statute that holds a
driver who drives too fast for conditions or runs a red light
responsible for their actions. He stated that the legal defense for
these people "is that they really didn't intend to kill someone."
He stated that similar legislation was presented to the Legislature
the previous session, "but was held up in the closing minutes of
the session."
Senator Taylor asked how this legislation would address a situation
whereby a vehicle slides off a road due to icy road conditions and
results in a family member in the car being killed. He noted that
the driver's negligence, according to this Legislation, contributed
to a fatality. He asked whether the word "may" in the Legislation
would allow the court discretion in addressing this scenario.
Senator Ogan responded that judges would have sufficient authority
to appropriately address the situation and that the court would
render an appropriate response. He stated that this "is exactly the
reason" the legislation includes the word "may." However, he
asserted, this legislation would also allow a judge to
appropriately address a situation whereby the action of the driver,
or repeated infractions of a driver, causes personal damage to
others.
Senator Bunde expressed understanding of the frustration that might
be caused by current statutes limitations; however, he asked
whether revoking a driver's license would have the desired result;
as, he furthered, some people would continue to drive or might
otherwise not be "inconvenienced."
Senator Ogan suspected that there are some people who "would thumb
their nose" at the loss of their driver's license. However, he
stressed that this legislation would be a deterrent to those people
who violate traffic laws by driving too fast or who run red lights
as opposed to those people who routinely drive recklessly or drive
while intoxicated.
LIEUTENANT MATT LEVEQUE, Alaska State Troopers, Department of
Public Safety, testified via teleconference from an offnet site and
agreed that some people would continue to drive without a driver's
license; however, some would respect the law and not drive. In
response to Senator Bunde's comment about further inconveniencing
offenders by, for instance, prohibiting them from airline travel
because they would not have a driver's license to present as
required at time of airline check-in, Lieutenant Leveque informed
that individuals who lose their driver's license would remain
eligible to apply for a state identification card. Therefore, he
continued the State would not deny individuals the ability to
travel.
Senator Olson asked whether Lieutenant Leveque supports the bill.
Lieutenant Leveque responded that the Department supports the bill.
Senator Taylor moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal note.
Without objection, HB 53 was REPORTED from Committee with previous
fiscal notes #1 and #2 from the Department of Administration and
previous fiscal note #3 from the Department of Law.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|