Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/26/2013 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB52 | |
| SB55 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 52-PORTABLE ELECTRONICS INSURANCE
1:33:53 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY announced the consideration of SB 52 and asked
for a motion to adopt the work draft committee substitute (CS).
SENATOR MICCICHE moved to adopt CS for SB 52, labeled 28-
LS0461\N, as the working document.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY objection for discussion purposes.
1:34:35 PM
SENATOR JOHN COGHILL, sponsor of SB 52, explained that the bill
provides more nimble insurance for portable electronic devices
and establishes a best practices rule for Alaska. He deferred
the detailed explanation to his intern Kari Nore.
1:35:49 PM
KARI NORE, Intern to Senator John Coghill, sponsor of SB 52
stated that this legislation seeks to bring structure to the
electronics insurance market and protect consumers. She
explained that homeowner's insurance does not necessarily cover
the theft of a portable electronic device, like a laptop
computer, from the homeowner's car or home. She offered to
provide a sectional analysis of SB 52.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY suggested she hit the major spots and the
committee would ask questions.
MS. NORE explained that a main point of the bill adds portable
electronics insurance to the list of insurances that are not
included under "service contract." Section 2 adds a new
subsection [AS 21.03.021(g)] to clarify that Title 21 does not
apply to a portable electronics manufacturer's warranty or
extended warranty. Section 4 adds a new paragraph (8) [to AS
21.27.150(a)] to allow the director of insurance to issue a
portable electronics limited producer license to a vendor that
sells or offers portable electronics insurance. The license
covers the vendor and employees for all locations in the state
where the vendor sells the products. The employees do not have
to be licensed as long as they are not compensated based on the
sale of insurance, the vendor has a training program, and the
vendor maintains a registry.
1:38:23 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE summarized that a business like ACS or Radio
Shack has the license to sell the insurance and employees of the
business can sell under that license as long as their
compensation isn't based on the sale of that insurance.
MS. NORE agreed. She continued to explain that Section 5 defines
portable electronics insurance, lists the materials that must be
presented to the consumer in writing, defines the procedure for
modification of the terms of the insurance, defines the
procedures to terminate the insurance, and lists the types of
devices that will be covered under portable electronics
insurance.
Section 6 provides an effective date of January 1, 2014 to allow
the Division of Insurance time to complete installation of a new
software program for data entry. This will prevent the bill from
having a fiscal impact.
1:39:51 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE described the legislation as timely, and noted
that Alaska will be the 44th state to adopt this legislation.
SENATOR OLSON questioned why the sponsor was bringing the
legislation forward if there were no complaints.
MS. NORE responded that the legislation was proactive and
anticipated what could be a problem in the near future.
SENATOR OLSON questioned the need to pass a law that addresses a
problem that doesn't exist now and because technology changes so
quickly, might not address an issue that arises in five or ten
years.
1:41:15 PM
RYNNIEVA MOSS, staff for Senator Coghill, said the sponsor has
been convinced that portable electronic devices are creating a
new industry in the insurance world and regulation is needed.
Consumers need to know if they are receiving coverage when they
purchase the produce or if they're paying for separate insurance
coverage. Because of nuances in this industry, the sponsor feels
regulation is justified.
SENATOR OLSON asked if states that have similar legislation have
had complaints from consumers.
MS. MOSS acknowledged that she didn't know and emphasized that
the intent is to protect the consumer.
SENATOR MICCICHE commented that replacing electronic devices can
be expensive and he would be interested in the product.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY asked if evidence from other states indicates
that in the future Alaska will need such a law and that the
sponsor was being proactive.
MS. NORE confirmed that the sponsor was preemptively introducing
the legislation to ensure consumer protection in the future.
1:44:54 PM
SENATOR OLSON asked what insurance companies think of this type
of legislation.
MS. NORE said she was not aware of any opposition to the bill.
MS. MOSS highlighted that vendors of insurance have objected to
the language on page 6, lines 10-16, because it requires
additional recordkeeping and paperwork. She explained that the
sponsor included the language to accommodate the division of
insurance, but the current director has indicated that he would
not object to removing the language. One company also raised
concern with existing statutory language on page 2, line 9,
relating to power surges. She said she wanted further
clarification before deleting that language, because it
addresses service contracts and the bill addresses portable
electronics insurance.
1:46:59 PM
BRET S. KOLB, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED) offered to
answer questions.
SENATOR OLSON asked if the department supported the bill.
MR. KOLB answered that the department is supportive of SB 52.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY asked if he sees any issues with the bill.
MR. KOLB confirmed that he did not object to removing the
language on page 6. The division has sufficient authority to
provide needed protections so that language is redundant.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY removed his objection, and version N was before
the committee.
He stated that he would hold SB 52 in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB52_Legislation_Summary.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_Sponsor_Statement.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_States_with_Similar_Legislation.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_Support_Letter_ATT.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_VersionA.PDF |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB55_Full_Text.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Alaska_Credit.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support Letter_GEICO.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support Letter_LibertyMutal.PDF |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter 1.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter_Progressive.PDF |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter_ReedElsevier.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter2.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter3.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter3.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter4.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_GeicoCorp.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 Support_Letter_Progressive.docx |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_AK credit_One_Page_Analysis.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB055-DCCED-DOI-02-22-13.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Sponsor_Statement.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB52_Sectional Analysis_2.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_CS_Sectional_Analysis_VersionN.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB55_Support_Letter6.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter7.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| CS_SB52_VersionN.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB55_Support_Letter8.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support Letter_CountryFincial.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter5.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter_StateFarm.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_CreditScore_QuartileData.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_CreditScore_QuartileData2.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55, CBIS NAMIC's written testimony.docx |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB52_Backup_Article1.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_Backup_Article2.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_Backup_Article3.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB55_Opposition_Letter.pdf |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB55_Support_Letter9.msg |
SL&C 2/26/2013 1:30:00 PM SL&C 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 55 |