Legislature(2019 - 2020)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/19/2020 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB52 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 52
"An Act relating to alcoholic beverages; relating to
the regulation of manufacturers, wholesalers, and
retailers of alcoholic beverages; relating to
licenses, endorsements, and permits involving
alcoholic beverages; relating to common carrier
approval to transport or deliver alcoholic beverages;
relating to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board;
relating to offenses involving alcoholic beverages;
amending Rule 17(h), Alaska Rules of Minor Offense
Procedure; and providing for an effective date."
9:04:08 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof noted that SB 52 had been heard
previously on February 11, and the committee would continue
the presentation and consider the sectional analysis,
fiscal notes, and public testimony. If there was sufficient
time the committee would consider amendments.
9:05:05 AM
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE, SPONSOR, commented that the bill
was the result of an 8-year effort. He thought everyone
knew there was a group of stakeholders working in the same
direction.
9:06:02 AM
KONRAD JACKSON, STAFF, SENATOR PETER MICCICHE, commented
that the bill was long and somewhat intimidating. He added
that the sectional analysis was long, and many sections of
the bill were reordered and reorganized for clarity, which
had been lacking in Title 4. He stated that he would only
quickly mention the reordered sections, which were
highlighted in yellow. Other sections with changes were
highlighted in magenta and green.
Mr. Jackson addressed the Sectional Analysis (copy on file)
[secretary's note: only portions of the sectional analysis
that were discussed are included due to document length]:
Sectional Analysis Version K
5/2/2019
Alcoholic Beverage Control; Alcohol Regulation
Title 4, Chapter 6: Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
Sections 1-9 Authority and duties of the board; Pages
1-5
Section 1: Declaration of Policy; purpose; finding.
Adds a new section AS 04.06.005 (Pages 1-2)
Section 2: Authority of director. Adds a new
subsection AS 04.06.075 to require that the director
of the Alcoholic Beverage Control board (ABC board)
shall include in the agency's budget resources for
administration, enforcement, education, training, and
prevention activities under Title 4. (Page 2)
Mr. Jackson explained that Sections 3, 4, and 5 were simply
reordered. He addressed other sections in the sectional
analysis:
Section 6: Powers and duties. Amends AS 04.06.090 to
add a new subsection (f) that directs the board to
prepare a Title 4 education plan for public safety,
industry, youth, municipalities, and the public with
annual revision.
Adds new subsections (g-j) which direct the board to
review fees every 5 years, allow opinions on
legislation amending this title, requires the board to
provide notice of violations to licensees after
receiving from the court system, and to post FASD
information online. (Page 3)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 7 was reordered. He
continued to read from the sectional analysis:
Subsection 8: Statewide database. Adds a new
subsection AS 04.06.095, which directs the board to
produce a report of aggregate regional sales of
alcohol in local option areas, based on information
retained in database and not including identifying
data about an individual purchaser or seller. (Page 4)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 7 was reordered. He
continued to read from the sectional analysis:
New Chapter 9: Licenses, Endorsements and Permits
Section 10: Adds the new Chapter 09 to Title 4
Licenses, Endorsements and Permits. Relocates and
renumbers many existing licenses and permits from
Chapter 11. Organizes into articles of licenses listed
by the 3 tiers: manufacture, wholesale, retail;
endorsements; and permits. (Pages 5-51)
Mr. Jackson noted that in Article 2 there were four
sections that were reordered. He continued to read from the
sectional analysis:
AS 04.09.050. Authorized sales. Retains existing
privileges for smaller manufacturers to self-
distribute to retail, wholesale, permitted and out of
state or country licensees. Requires large
manufacturers to go through wholesale distributors.
(Pages 6-7)
AS 04.09.060. Unlicensed manufacturing. Relocates
existing penalty for unlicensed manufacture from
04.11.010. (Page 7)
9:08:57 AM
Mr. Jackson continued to address parts of the sectional
analysis:
Mr. Jackson noted that Article 3 was reordered, with the
reduction in annual transaction fees for smaller
businesses. He continued to read from the sectional
analysis:
AS 04.09.110. Limited wholesale brewed beverage and
wine license. Relocates limited wholesale license
from previous wholesale license section (AS
04.11.160(b)) in a separate section, maintains $400
biennial fee, maintains maximum $10,000 fee, and
reduces annual transaction fees for smaller
businesses. (Page 9)
AS 04.09.150. Failure to pay annual fee or file
affidavit. States that failure to pay an annual
wholesale fee
or file an affidavit is a violation and sets the
penalty. (Page 11)
AS 04.09.160. Failure to pay biennial fee or file
declaration. States that failure to pay a biennial fee
and
failure to file a declaration are violations and sets
the penalty. (Page 11)
Article 4. Retail Licensees
AS 04.09.200. Beverage dispensary license. Relocates
and simplifies the BDL license language from
04.11.090, maintains the $2,500 biennial fee,
references the multiple fixed counter endorsement, and
sets the penalty for unauthorized beverage dispensary
activity. Sections in current BDL for bowling alley
and hotel licensees relocated to become separate
endorsements. (Pages 11-12)
AS 04.09.210. Restaurant and eating place license.
Relocates license from 04.11.100, sets biennial fee at
$1250, defines the1:1 food to alcohol ratio, limits
the number of annual allowed after-hours entertainment
events to six, defines when minors can be on the
premises, and sets penalty for failure to comply with
license terms. (Pages 12-14)
AS 04.09.310. Brewery retail license. Creates new
license type based on relocated existing language in
AS 04.11.130 for brewery retail activities, sets
biennial fee at $1,250, requires retail license to be
adjacent to manufacturing location, and sets penalty
for failure to comply with license terms. (Pages 21-
22)
AS 04.09.320. Winery retail license. Creates new
license type based on existing language in AS
04.11.140 for winery retail activities, sets biennial
fee at $1,000, requires retail license to be adjacent
to manufacturing location, defines sales volume limits
for cider and mead depending on alcohol content, and
sets penalty for failure to comply with license terms.
(Pages 22-23)
AS 04.09.330. Distillery retail license. Creates new
license type based on existing language in AS
04.11.170 for distillery retail activities, sets
biennial fee at $1,250, requires retail license to be
adjacent to manufacturing location, and sets penalty
for failure to comply with license terms.(Pages 23-24)
AS 04.09.340. Beverage dispensary tourism license.
Relocates license from AS 04.11.400(d), maintains
biennial fee at $2,500, maintains exemption from
number of rooms required for renewing licenses, and
sets penalty for unauthorized beverage dispensary
activity. Other language in AS 04.11.400(d) relocated
to Hotel or Motel Endorsement. (Pages 24-26)
AS 04.09.350. Seasonal restaurant or eating place
license. Creates new license type, sets biennial
license fee at $1,250, defines which communities can
qualify for having this license type, sets out formula
for determining number of allowed licenses per
community, and sets penalty for failure to comply with
license terms. (Pages 26-28)
AS 04.09.360. Winery direct shipment license. Creates
new license type authorizing direct to consumer
(including online) sales of wine for in-state or out-
of-state winery, sets biennial license fee at $200,
directs the board to develop an application form
specifically for this license, prohibits sales by this
license type to local option areas, and sets penalty
for failure to comply with license terms. (Pages 28-
30)
Mr. Jackson continued to speak to the sectional analysis:
AS 04.09.370. Unlicensed retail sale. Relocates
existing unlicensed retail sale from 04.11.010and
maintains misdemeanor A penalty. (Page 30)
Mr. Jackson addressed Article 5, which defined the types of
endorsements which could be added to a license. He read the
various possible endorsements. He noted that all sections
also included penalties for non-compliance with the
endorsement.
Mr. Jackson addressed Article 6 which defined the types of
permits. Most of the sections were reordered and
reorganized. A new section created a package store tasting
event permit. The end of article 6 included penalties for
failure to comply permit requirements.
9:13:06 AM
Mr. Jackson addressed Article 7 under the bill:
AS 04.09.750. Common carrier approval. Requires the
board to approve a common carrier to transport and
deliver alcoholic beverages to consumers within the
state in response to a consumer's order, and sets
requirements and penalties for common carriers. (Pages
49-51)
Mr. Jackson pointed out that under Article 7 there were new
penalties related to licensing. The bill maintained a
misdemeanor penalty for the license and permit for
possession and sale of alcohol. There were a couple of
other sections that were reordered and reorganized. He
noted that under Section 14, there were new penalties of
$250 for violation that dealt with the purchase or barter
of alcoholic beverages from a non-licensee.
Mr. Jackson addressed a portion of the sectional analysis:
Section 16: Board approval of transfers. Adds new
subsections to AS 04.11.040 (d) and (e) to make it aa
minor offense and provide for a penalty for the
unauthorized transfer of an alcoholic beverage license
or permit. It is a violation. (Page 52)
Section 17: Reports required of limited liability
organization. Adds new subsections to AS 04.11.045 (c)
and (d) to set the penalty for failure to report a
change in member interest or manager at a$250 fine.
(Page 53)
Section 18: Reports required of corporations. Adds new
subsections to AS 04.11.050 (c) and (d) to set the
penalty for failure to report a stock transfer or
change of officers or board members at a $250 fine.
(Pages 53)
Section 19: Reports required of partnerships. Adds new
subsections to AS 04.11.055 (c) and (d) to set the
penalty for failure to report a transfer of
partnership interest or change of general partner at a
$250 fine. (Page 53)
Mr. Jackson addressed Section 20, which was reordered and
dealt with a nonresident distiller manufacturing license.
Section 21 added a new subsection to maintain the existing
misdemeanor A penalty. He noted that Section 22 was
reordered. He spoke to the new concept in Section 23:
Section 23: Application for new license or permit.
Amends AS 04.11.260 to exempt winery direct shipment
license from the application process for other license
types, defined instead in AS 04.09.360(Page 55)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 24 was reordered. He
continued to address the sectional analysis:
Section 25: Application for renewal of license or
permit. Amends AS 04.11.270 to exempt winery direct
shipment license from the renewal process, defined
instead in AS 04.09.360. (Page 56)
Section 26: Application for transfer of a license to
another person. Amends AS 04.11.280 to add
endorsements as transferrable with a license. (Page
56)
Section 27: Adds a provision for automatic transfer of
a REPL or seasonal REPL license if the board takes no
action within 90 days. (Pages 56-57)
Section 29: Criminal justice information and records.
Amends AS 04.11.295(c)(1)adds reference to conditional
contractor's permit to the definition of "applicant."
(Page 58)
Section 30: Notice of application. Adds new subsection
AS 04.11.310 (c) to exempt winery direct shipment
license from notice requirements that do not pertain
to this type of license.(Page58)
Section 31: False statement on application. Adds a new
subsection to AS 04.11.315, relocating AS 04.16.210
and defines the crime of making false statements on an
application as perjury, with the existing felony C
penalty defined in AS 11.56.200. (Page58)
Mr. Jackson detailed that Section 32 was reordered, as was
Section 33 through Section 36. He informed that Section 37
was a new concept:
Section 37: Denial of license or permit renewal. Adds
new subsection 04.11.330 (e) to exempt a winery direct
shipment license from certain provisions in the denial
of an application section that do not pertain to this
type of license.(Page 61)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 38 through Section 44 were
simply reordered.
9:16:19 AM
Mr. Jackson addressed Section 45 on page 11 of the
sectional analysis:
Section 45: Adds a new subsection AS 04.11.395(b) to
allow the board delegate authority to the director to
impose conditions or restrictions on any permit other
than a conditional contractor's permit. The director
reviews permit applications and issues all permits.
(Page 67)
Mr. Jackson informed that Section 46 was reordered. He
continued to address the sectional analysis:
Section 47: Population limitations. Amends AS
04.11.400(a)(duplicate section), to edit subsection
references, adds new population limit of 1:9,000for
new manufacturer retail licenses, adds licenses exempt
from population limits and exempts local option
populations from calculations. [Effective with other
licensing changes, 1/1/2021] (Pages 68-70)
Section 48: Population limitations. Repeals and
reenacts AS 04.11.400(i) to list licenses exempt from
population limits, including manufacturer (production
only) licenses, wholesale licenses and currently
exempt retail licenses that primarily cater to
tourists and travelers. (Page70)
Section 49: Population limitations. Amends AS
04.11.400(k) to edit reference to beverage dispensary
license, allows relocation of a package store, lowers
borough threshold population for qualifying boroughs,
restricts number of licenses eligible for transfer to
those exceeding population limits and defines number
of allowed transfers by city, not borough.(Pages 70-
71)
Section 50: Petition for additional restaurant or
eating place licenses for certain local governing
bodies. Adds new section AS 04.11.405 that gives first
class cities, home rule cities, or unified
municipalities the ability to petition the board for
additional restaurant or eating place licenses
allocated to their jurisdiction.[Effective
immediately](Pages71-72)
Mr. Jackson informed that Section 51 through Section 54
were reorganized. He spoke to Section 55 and Section 56:
Section 55: Person and location. Amends AS 04.11.430
to allow licenses to be issued to government entities
and tribal organizations. Place residency requirements
on corporations and limited liability organizations.
Adds a reference to endorsements in relation to
information required, including telephone number, and
email address. [Effective immediately] (Pages73-74)
Mr. Jackson addressed Section 56:
Section 56: Prohibited financial interest. Amends AS
04.11.450(b)to clarify that a wholesaler cannot own a
manufacturer license or a retail license, removes
restrictions on manufacturers owning a retail license,
and removes references to repealed licenses. (Page74)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 57 was reorganized. He
addressed Section 58 and Section 59:
Section 58: Prohibited financial interest. Adds new
subsections to AS 04.11.450 (g-h) to restrict
manufacturers above a certain annual production level
from owning a wholesale license or retail license, and
defines thresholds for production by product type.
(Page75)
Section 59: Prior public approval. Amends AS 04.11.460
to exempt a winery direct shipment license boundary
restrictions that do not pertain to this type of
license. (Page75)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 60 through Section 80 were
all reorganized and re-worded. He addressed Chapter 16:
Section 81: Hours of sale and presence on licensed
premises (standard closing hours). Amends AS
04.16.010(c) to clarify the hours that a person cannot
be on the licensed premises outside of allowed
operating hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m.)unless to
conduct business with the licensee, maintenance or
improvements or is the holder of a common carrier
license, and adds restaurant endorsement reference.
(Page 85)
Section 82: Hours of sale and presence on licensed
premises (standard closing hours). Amends AS 04.16.010
to add new a penalty section(e), making it a
violation. (Page 85)
Section 83: Pricing and marketing of alcoholic
beverages. Amends AS 04.16.015(a) to exempt
manufacturer and package store sampling endorsements
from the prohibition on providing alcohol free of
charge, and defines a week as seven days for pricing
and marketing of alcoholic beverages. (Page 85-86)
Section 84: Pricing and marketing of alcoholic
beverages. Amends AS 04.16.015 by adding a new
subsection (e) to set the penalty for violating this
section as a violation. (Page 86)
Section 85: Trade practices. Adds a new section AS
04.16.017 to specify illegal practices by
manufacturers as defined in federal law, and directs
the board to adopt regulations defining exceptions to
these rules and define administrative penalties for
violations.(Pages 86-88)
Section 86: Solicitation of alcoholic beverages;
purchase on behalf of another. Amends AS 04.16.020 to
set the penalty($100 fine) for unauthorized
solicitation or purchase of alcoholic beverages.(Page
88)
Section 87: Online sale and purchase of alcoholic
beverages. Adds a new section AS 04.16.022 prohibiting
online purchase and sale to Alaska consumers unless
the licensee has a winery direct shipment license or
package store shipping endorsement and sets penalties.
(Page 88)
9:20:59 AM
Mr. Jackson continued to address the sectional analysis:
Section 88: Illegal presence on premises involving
alcoholic beverages. Amends AS 04.16.025(a)to add
statutory references to all penalties involving sale
without a license. (Pages88-89)
Section 89: Prohibited conduct relating to drunken
persons. Amends AS 04.16.030 to change existing
penalty for prohibited conduct relating to a drunken
person, adds administrative penalty to licensee if
employee is convicted of a violation of this section,
and adds misdemeanor penalty for licensee who
knowingly allows employees to violate this
section.(Page89)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 90 was reordered and
reorganized. He addressed the sectional analysis:
Section 91: Possession of ingredients for homebrew in
certain areas. Adds new subsections to AS 04.16.035
(b-c) to clarify current penalty for possession of
ingredients for homebrew. (Page89)
Section 92: Access of drunken persons to licensed
premises. Adds new subsections to AS 04.16.040to
relocate and change the penalty for prohibited access
by a drunken person. (Page 90)
Section 93: Obligation to enforce restrictions in
licensed premises. Adds new subsections to AS
04.16.045 (b-c) to relocate and change penalty for
permitting consumption not authorized under a license.
(Page 90)
Section 94: Access of persons with restriction on
purchasing alcohol. Amends AS 04.16.047to reference
the existing penalty for entering and remaining on
licensed premises defined in AS 04.16.160.(Page 90)
Mr. Jackson highlighted that Section 95 though Section 98
were reordered for organizational purposes. He addressed
the sectional analysis:
Section 99: Furnishing or delivery of alcoholic
beverages to persons under the age of 21. Repeals and
reenacts AS 04.16.051(d) to define existing offense of
furnishing or delivering alcohol to a minor.(Page 92)
Section 100: Furnishing or delivery of alcoholic
beverages to persons under the age of 21.Adds a new
subsection to AS 04.16.051 (e) to relocate the
existing C felony penalty for furnishing or delivering
to a minor by a person, for situations involving
serious harm, repeat offenses, and if the violation
occurs in a local option area. (Page 92)
Section 101: Furnishing of alcoholic beverages to
person under the age of 21 by licensees. Amends AS
04.16.052to change the penalties for furnishing or
delivering alcohol to a minor by a licensee or
employee, adds administrative penalty to licensee if
an employee is convicted of a violation of this
section and shifts misdemeanor penalty in AS 04.16.150
to the licensee who knowingly allows employees to
violate this section.(Pages 92-93)
Section 102: Room rental for purposes of consuming
alcoholic beverages. Amends AS 04.16.055tomaintain the
current penalty of class A misdemeanor for renting a
room for the purpose of providing alcoholic beverages
to a person under 21 years of age. (Page 93)
Section 103: Permitting minor to illegally possess
liquor in a dwelling. Amends AS 04.16.057(b) to
maintain current penalty as a violation and adds $500
fine. (Page 93)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 104 was reordered. Section
105 was a penalty section dealing with purchase by or
delivery to persons under the age of 21. Section 106 was
reordered. Section 107 was a penalty section that dealt
with consumption at school events.
Mr. Jackson detailed that Section 108 was not highlighted
in the sectional analysis; it was just a clarification. He
continued to address the document:
Section 109: Prohibition of bottle clubs. Adds new
subsections to AS 04.16.090 (d-e) to define the crime
of maintaining a bottle club, relocates and maintains
current penalty. (Page 95)
Section 110: Sale of certain alcoholic beverages
prohibited. Amends AS 04.16.110 to define sale of a
prohibited alcoholic beverage, relocates and maintains
current penalty. (Page 95)
Section 111: Removal or introduction of alcoholic
beverages. Amends AS 04.16.120 to define removal or
introduction of alcoholic beverages, sets penalty and
exemptions. (Page 95-96)
Sections112-114: Alcoholic beverages transported by
common carrier. Repeals and reenacts AS 04.16.125(a)
to allow for delivery to a person over the age of 21
and adds clarifying language to how the delivery must
be labeled. Maintains penalty for unauthorized
transportation of alcoholic beverages by common
carrier into a local option area and makes
noncompliance a violation. (Page 96)
Section 115: Stock confined to licensed premises. Adds
a new subsection to AS 04.16.130 (c)to set the penalty
for unauthorized storage of alcoholic beverages as a
violation. (Pages96-97)
Section 116: Sale or consumption of alcoholic
beverages in a warehouse. Amends AS 04.16.140 to add
sections (b-c) to set the penalty for consuming
alcoholic beverages in a warehouse as a violation.
(Page 97)
Section 117: Licensee responsible for violations.
Amends AS 04.16.150 to set the penalty for failure to
ensure compliance as a violation. (Page 97) Section
118: Restriction on purchasing alcoholic beverages.
Amends AS 04.16.160 to add new sections (c-d) to
maintain existing penalty for noncompliance on a
restriction for purchasing alcohol. (Page97)
9:24:07 AM
Mr. Jackson continued to address the sectional analysis:
Section 119: Source of alcoholic beverages. Amends AS
04.16.170 to exempt winery direct shipment license,
maintains penalties for sale of alcoholic beverages
from or to an unlicensed person. (Page 97)
Section 120: Source of alcoholic beverages. Amends AS
04.16.170 to add new subsections (c-d) to maintain the
existing penalty for violating this section as class A
misdemeanor. (Page97)
Section 121: Restrictions on purchase and sale of
alcoholic beverages. Amends AS 04.16.172 to renumber
and a statutory reference to the new license types and
maintains current misdemeanor A penalty for licensee
obtaining alcoholic beverages from an unlicensed
seller. (Pages 97-98)
Section 122: Restrictions on purchase and sale of
alcoholic beverages. Amends AS 04.16.172 to add new
subsections (b-c) to maintain the existing misdemeanor
A penalty for violating this section. (Page 98)
Section 123: Furnishing alcoholic beverages in aid of
gambling enterprise. Amends AS 04.16.175to add new
subsections that maintain the existing misdemeanor A
penalty for the crime of furnishing an alcoholic
beverage in aid of a gambling enterprise. (Page 98)
Mr. Jackson informed that Section 124 was reordered.
Section 125 would add a definition for "conviction."
Mr. Jackson addressed Section 126:
Section 126: Penalties for violation. Amends AS
04.16.180 to add new subsections (f-g), adds
clarification that licensees are subject to
administrative penalties imposed by the board for
violations of AS 04.16.030 and AS 04.16.052, and adds
mitigating circumstances for licensees. (Pages 126-
100)
Mr. Jackson relayed Section 127 through 130 were reordered
and reorganized.
Mr. Jackson addressed Section 131 in the sectional
analysis:
Section 131: Keg registration. Adds a new section
04.21.012 establishing a keg registration process
including proof of age, registration form
requirements, identification tags, and establishes the
penalties for possession and sale of alcoholic
beverages in an unregistered keg. (Pages 102-103)
Mr. Jackson explained that Section 132 through Section 136
were reordered.
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 136 also included a new
concept:
Section 136: Alcohol server education course. Amends
section AS 04.21.025(c) to require permittees (along
with licensees, agents, and employees) to take and
pass an alcohol server education course within 30 days
after being licensed, permitted, or employed.
Additionally, a person may not sell or serve alcoholic
beverages, or check the ID of a patron at a permitted
event unless that person possesses a valid alcohol
server card. (Page 104)
Mr. Jackson summarized that Section 137 and 138 were
reordered; and Section 137 had a small penalty piece
defining the failure to comply and setting the penalty as a
violation. He continued that Section 139 was a penalty
section dealing with the warehousing of alcoholic
beverages, and Section 140 was reordered.
Mr. Jackson referenced the sectional analysis:
Section 139: Warehousing of alcoholic beverages.
Amends AS 04.21.060 to add a new subsection (b), which
define the penalty of storing alcoholic beverages and
sets it at a violation. (Page106)
Section 140: Posting of warning signs. Repeals and
reenacts AS 04.21.065(a) to update the license and
permit types required to post warning signs, and adds
statutory references. (Pages106-107)
Section 141: Fines and other criminal penalties. Adds
a new section AS 04.21.072, 04.21.074, and 04.21.076to
set penalties for other violations, misdemeanors or
felonies, unless otherwise specified. Directs the
supreme court to establish a bail schedule and places
requirements on the courts for suspending fines or
imposition/execution of sentence. (Page 107)
Mr. Jackson detailed that Section 142 through Section 144
were reordered. Section 145 defined some of the new terms
in the bill.
Mr. Jackson spoke to the sectional analysis:
Section 156: Winery direct shipment tax; statement;
audit. Adds a new section AS 43.60.060 to establish
tax collection on direct wine shipments from out of
state business holding this license and outlines
requirements for the Department of Revenue. (Page 115)
Mr. Jackson noted that Section 157 and Section 158 were
reordered. He explained that the last page of the sectional
analysis included transition and effective dates for the
legislation.
Co-Chair von Imhof appreciated the color coding on the
sectional analysis.
Senator Micciche clarified that the penalty sections were
highlighted, and few had been changed. He thought it
mistakenly gave the impression that all the penalties had
been changed.
Co-Chair von Imhof supposed that that amount of magenta
highlighted on the document was not indicative of new
penalties.
Senator Micciche agreed.
Senator Olson asked for more clarity on Article 7
pertaining to common carriers. He asked how the section
pertained to 135 operators that were vital to rural travel.
9:29:06 AM
AT EASE
9:33:34 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair von Imhof asked Senator Olson to restate his
question.
Senator Olson referenced Article 7 and common carriers. He
asked if small air taxi operators (that transported mail,
food, and passengers) had weighed in on the bill.
Senator Micciche deferred the question to a consultant. He
reminded that it was currently a crime to transport alcohol
to a dry community.
9:34:40 AM
ANNA BRAWLEY, AGNEW BECK CONSULTING (via teleconference),
understood that alcohol shipments were illegal for the
United States Mail Service. She used the example of a
winery in another state, which would use a carrier such as
FedEx. She understood that contractors of the United States
Mail Service would also not deliver alcohol.
Senator Olson clarified that his question was if 135
operators had been consulted on the bill content,
particularly with regard to the penalties.
Mr. Brawley stated that the operators were not contacted to
her knowledge.
Senator Olson shared that he had grave concerns. He thought
that understanding the penalties was very important and
thought the operators should weigh in on the subject.
9:36:33 AM
Senator Micciche recalled a previous conversation and
reminded that there was no existing system that accounted
for the sale and delivery of alcohol in Alaska,
particularly in dry communities. He emphasized that the
bill did not change the impacts on companies that could not
legally transport alcohol. He asked Senator Olson to
consider the fact that the bill provided a system for legal
orders from out of state to be delivered to communities
that were not dry and were not local option communities.
Co-Chair von Imhof asked if there were current penalties if
an operator delivered alcohol to a dry community.
Senator Micciche was not prepared to explain the current
penalties and reiterated that it was currently illegal and
there were penalties for delivering alcohol to a dry
community.
Co-Chair von Imhof assumed there was not a current process
by which alcohol was delivered to a community that was not
dry.
Senator Micciche answered in the affirmative.
Co-Chair von Imhof asked how alcohol was delivered to the
communities.
Senator Micciche deferred to Ms. Brawley.
Ms. Brawley understood that deliveries were dependent upon
whether a local option community allowed for importation of
alcohol. She was not familiar with the specific carriers
that were used for package store deliveries. She thought
UPS and FedEx had internal policies and only allowed for
wine delivery through commercial contracts. She imagined
that the companies would have internal policies that were
being followed. She thought some local option communities
had distribution centers where alcohol would be delivered,
and the customer would pick it up.
9:39:37 AM
Senator Olson was not concerned with major carriers such as
UPS and FedEx or large airports. He was concerned about
carriers that were serving small communities such as Koyuk,
Shaktoolik and Diomede. He listed Ravn Air, Bering Air, and
Grant Air; and expressed concern about potential
violations. He was concerned that if one of a village's two
carriers received a violation, it would jeopardize
important passenger and freight service to the village. He
thought the bill should stay in committee until members
heard from operators or the Alaska Air Carriers
Association.
Co-Chair von Imhof pondered the committee's responsibility
in contacting all interested parties affected by the
numerous bills the committee considered. She wondered if it
made sense to have a conceptual amendment requiring letters
to be sent to make carriers aware that the bill was
happening. She questioned if the carriers had a problem
with being regulated via provisions of the bill. She
wondered about the outcome Senator Olson was looking for.
Senator Olson was not certain where Co-Chair von Imhof was
coming from. He thought it was too burdensome to contact
all carriers, but pointed out that there was an association
that spoke on behalf of carriers. He was asking for the
carriers or the association to weigh in on the issue. He
thought it was a serious issue that affected his
constituents.
9:42:57 AM
Senator Micciche commented that bootlegging was illegal in
Alaska. He reiterated that the bill simply set up a common
carrier approval process so that the individuals would be
trained on the legal delivery of alcohol ordered from in
the state or from a winery out of state. He thought the
concerns being expressed were in current law. The bill set
up a system for delivering alcohol to areas where it was
legal. He asserted that stakeholders would be contacted
through the regulation process. He reminded that there was
a region of the state where alcohol was a primary cause of
issues.
Co-Chair von Imhof thought Senator Olson was trying to make
the point that there could be added burdensome activities
for air carriers. She thought Senator Micciche had made a
good point that forthcoming regulations were potentially
more of a concern than the bill itself.
9:45:12 AM
AT EASE
9:46:19 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair von Imhof reminded that the issue at hand was the
weighing in of the Alaska Air Carriers Association.
Senator Olson understood that a phone call was made and
there did not seem to be any changes that would jeopardize
the air carrier operator certificates if the legislation
were to pass. The issues he had raised had been addressed
and he withdrew any objection to the legislation.
Senator Micciche thought that Senator Olson had brought up
a good point. He noted that the bill had three more
committees to go through. He stated he would specifically
reach out to the Alaska Air Carrier's Association to ensure
it was aware of the changes. He reminded that the changes
in the bill were there to ensure that alcohol was not
delivered to minors.
Co-Chair von Imhof clarified that the Senate Finance
Committee was the last committee the bill would pass
through before going to the other body.
9:48:13 AM
Senator Bishop addressed a new fiscal note from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development,
OMB Component 3119. He discussed the operating
expenditures. The funding source was designated general
funds.
Senator Bishop noted there was a total operating expense
shown as $241,000 for FY 21; $387,500 for FY 22; $254,300
for FY 23; and $229,300 for FY 24 through FY 26. He read
portions from the analysis on page 2 and page 3 of the
fiscal note:
This bill is a result of recommendations from a
five-year process initiated by the Alcoholic Beverage
Control (ABC) Board to improve the structure,
organization, specific policies, and associated
implementation issues in alcohol regulation.
EXPENDITURES (in thousands)
The liquor licensing functions of the Alcohol and
Marijuana Control Office (AMCO) are fully funded by
program receipts from licensing fees.
Passage of this legislation will start a very short
year and half for AMCO and the ABC Board to prepare
for full implementation. The capacity of the current
staffing level is not sufficient to manage the
transition. A long-term non-perm Project Assistant
(range 16) for two years will be needed to
successfully prepare the board, the office, and the
licensees for the transition. A new Occupational
Licensing Examiner (range 14) is added to assist with
license transitions, ensuring that normal application
review that is unrelated to the transition is not
slowed, which would negatively affect applicants and
licensees.
Improved enforcement is a stated goal of this
legislation. The addition of a Special Investigator I
position (range 19) starting in FY2022 will enable the
ABC Board to better fulfill its responsibilities,
including limiting youth access to alcohol and
reducing the harms of overconsumption.
As a result of this bill, regulations across 3 AAC 304
will need to be rewritten by the ABC Board and adopted
by the effective date of January 1, 2022.
Senator Bishop commented on the aggressive schedule for
proposed changes, which necessitated the additional
positions. He continued to read portions of the analysis on
page 2 of the fiscal note:
The aged alcohol licensing database needs to be
replaced with licensing workflow/database software to
comply with data collection, research, and reporting
requirements. The new database is estimated to cost
$750.0 for initial development, implementation, and
support and maintenance. A capital appropriation for
the Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office Licensing and
Enforcement Solutions Project will allow AMCO to
develop an alcohol licensing system that will serve as
a comprehensive solution for licensing. In addition to
being a fully-functioning licensing software, the
alcohol system will replace the current written order
database for mail-order alcohol purchases; may
interface with the existing marijuana licensing system
to provide a comprehensive view of AMCO's licensees;
and may interface with or provide for tracking of
complaints and enforcement actions related to
licensees. The project may be developed in-house or via
contract. The capital appropriation is anticipated to
be funded by $100.0 general funds and $650.0 alcohol
licensing receipts, which will be collected from
annual revenue collections as they are available and
unused.
Senator Bishop discussed the analysis on page 3 of the
fiscal note:
2000 Travel
? Board travel costs for four additional days of
meetings: $3.2/year for the first two years
($1.6/meeting day)
? Local Government Specialist travel for two-day trips
to each of the four judicial districts per year:
$5.6/year ($1.4/two-day trip)
Travel for new Special Investigator I positions:
$10.0/year for each position
3000 Services
? Attorney review of regulations: $12.0/year in each
of the first two years (75 hours/year)
? Printing, design, and publication costs for
education materials: $10.0/year in FY2021 and
$34.0/year in FY2022
? Public notice advertisements: $5.0/year for the
first two years
? Postage: $1.0/year in FY2021 and $3.0/year in FY2022
? Statewide core services and allocated costs:
$15.0/year per position
Senator Bishop mentioned an additional few thousand dollars
in costs for setting up the new employees.
9:53:08 AM
Senator Bishop addressed a new fiscal note from the
Department of Revenue, OMB Component 2476. He read from the
analysis on page 2:
Section 155 of the bill would extend the existing tax
on wine of $2.50/gallon to holders of a winery direct
shipment license. The winery direct shipment license
is a new license type that would be created by this
bill. Under current statutes, direct shippers of
alcoholic beverages do not have a tax filing or
payment obligation--currently, the excise tax on
alcoholic beverages is paid only by businesses that
have a physical presence in the state.
The Tax Division has consistently collected around
$2.4 million in taxes on wine over the past several
years. Extending the tax to out-of-state, direct
shippers of wine would have a positive effect on tax
revenues. However, the Tax Division does not have data
on direct shipments of wine, therefore, the change in
tax revenue is indeterminate.
Senator Bishop addressed a new fiscal note from the
Judiciary, OMB Component 768. He detailed that there was a
total operating appropriation request for FY 21 was
$38,500. He read from the analysis on page 2:
Senate Bill 52 substantially reorganizes Title 4,
Alcohol Beverages, by adding new provisions, revising
existing provisions, and reorganizing the Title around
chapters that concern distinct aspects of the alcohol
industry and its operations.
SB 52 also changes the penalty category and specifies
an exact penalty that must be imposed upon conviction
for many alcohol-related offenses. Specifically, the
bill changes about 63 offenses that are currently
classified as misdemeanors and would classify them as
violations instead. Section 141 would require the
supreme court to establish a schedule of bail amounts
for the violations.
The court system's current staff does not have the
extra time or capacity to undertake implementing SB 52
without additional resources. To do so, the court
system would need to hire a short-term staff attorney
in the administrative office to prepare the bail
schedule, which is a substantial undertaking that will
take a significant amount of time. In addition, the
attorney would need to draft instructions for clerks
and judicial officers, and work with the IT staff on
the tasks related to re-classification of offenses,
such as developing codes for charging documents and
entering into CourtView.
The court system anticipates that it will need one-
time funds for an attorney to be retained for three
months during FY 21 to accomplish the tasks related to
implementation of Senate Bill 52. The court system
therefore submits this fiscal note for that one-time
expense of $38,500 to fund that position.
Co-Chair von Imhof opened PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
9:57:50 AM
SARAH OATES, ALASKA CABARET, HOTEL, RESTAURANT AND
RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference),
spoke in favor of the bill. She explained that the
association had entered the ninth year of robust
stakeholder work toward meaningful alcohol regulatory
reform. She detailed that CHARR and the Alaska Brewer's
Guild had met throughout 2019 to discuss the most
contentious sections of Title 4, which had caused previous
iterations of the bill to stall out in the legislative
process. She thought consensus had been reached between
multiple parties and all three industry tiers. She spoke to
facets of the bill. She had worked with the Alcohol and
Marijuana Control Office (AMCO) for 7.5 years. While at
AMCO she had participated in the stakeholder group as a
subject matter expert and had recommended changes that were
incorporated in the bill. She requested on behalf of the
Alaska Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant and Retailers Association
(CHARR) that the committee pass an amendment to clarify
entertainment activities and operating hours. She stated
that CHARR offered its full support with the changes.
10:00:01 AM
MIKE ABBOT, CEO, ALASKA MENTAL HEALTH TRUST AUTHORITY
(AMHTA), ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), spoke in support
of the bill. He noted that the trust had been working as a
stakeholder in the process to develop the legislation over
several years. The trust continued to believe that its
beneficiaries were better off with the legislation being
enacted. He thought the bill had many positive public
health and public safety impacts, which was why the trust
recommended the adoption of the bill in a timely fashion
during legislative session.
10:01:33 AM
TIFFANY HALL, RECOVER ALASKA, ANCHORAGE (via
teleconference), spoke in support of the bill. She noted
that Recover Alaska was an organization that worked to
reduce excessive alcohol use and its harms across the
state. Her organization had been working on the content of
the bill for eight or nine years. She commented on the
state's problems caused by alcohol. She cited that alcohol
cost the state $2.4 billion per year; and that Alaskans
were dying at rates three times the national average. She
appreciated that the bill would limit youth access to
alcohol. She liked the regulation of internet sales of
alcohol as proposed in the bill. She like the provisions
for statewide keg registration and mandatory trainings. She
appreciated changes to penalties for overserving or serving
of minors. She thought the bill closed the current loophole
on population limits. She thought the entire bill clarified
Title 4. She commended the stakeholder groups for
compromising on areas of the bill to allow it to move
forward. She acknowledged that there were other issues
related to alcohol that were not addressed in the bill, but
understood it was critical to have compromise with the many
stakeholders.
10:05:29 AM
BETH MCEWEN, SELF, JUNEAU, spoke in support of the bill.
She was the municipal clerk for the City of Juneau and had
served on the stakeholder's task force group since the
inception of the bill. She thought the bill reached a good
compromise. She supported the bill and encouraged its
passage.
Co-Chair von Imhof CLOSED public testimony.
10:06:56 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof wanted to consider amendments.
Senator Bishop clarified that the new fiscal note from the
Judiciary (OMB Component 768) still stood. He noted that
the Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact indicated that the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
and the Department of Health and Social Services did not
anticipate any fiscal impact for FY 21 through FY 26.
10:08:06 AM
Senator Bishop MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1.
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Co-Chair von Imhof explained that the amendment would add
concepts that had been vetted and approved by the committee
and the Senate the previous session in another piece of
legislation but had been removed in the other body. The
amendment related to music festival permits and the number
of special permit events a non-profit could host each year.
Senator Bishop relayed that a music festival permit
authorized the holder of a restaurant or eating place
license to sell beer and wine at a music festival held off
the license holder's premises. A permit could only be
issued in the unorganized borough, one time per year, not
to exceed four days for music festivals that had existed at
the same location for at least 10 years prior to
application. The special events permit would allow non-
profits to host up to 10 special events, while current law
only allowed for 5. He used the example of the Veteran's of
Foreign Wars.
Co-Chair von Imhof understood that Senator Bishop and his
staff had worked with the stakeholders on the music
festival language, and there was no opposition to the
amendment.
Senator Micciche did not think the amendment had a major
impact and was specific to an event that occurred in one
location where the logistics were challenging. He did not
have an objection to the amendment.
Co-Chair von Imhof WITHDREW her objection. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 1 was
ADOPTED.
10:11:09 AM
Senator Bishop MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 2.
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Co-Chair von Imhof explained that the amendment related to
large resort license holders and would simply clarify
language to better describe what was intended by the
section. The section allowed a customer at a large resort
to take a glass of wine from the fire pit to the customer's
room. The amendment had been vetted by stakeholders and
there had been no objection.
Senator Micciche spoke to the amendment, which he thought
met the intent of the bill. He asserted that the purpose of
the bill was for common sense and eliminating unnecessary
obstacles to reasonable behavior. He supported the
amendment.
Co-Chair von Imhof WITHDREW her objection. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
10:12:29 AM
Senator Bishop MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 3.
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Senator Micciche explained that the amendment was the
"grand compromise" that brought the three parties together
in support of the bill. The amendment would change the
population and limits on manufacturers from 1 in 9,000 to 1
in 12,000. The amendment would grandfather in existing
manufacturing facilities, and changed the operating hours
of tasting rooms from 8 o'clock to 10 o'clock in the
evening. The amendment allowed for some entertainment and
allowed for events per year (such as a concert).
Fundraisers would also be allowed. He thought the amendment
allowed for manufacturers with tasting rooms to more fully
utilize facilities. He asserted that the amendment met the
concerns of CHARR. He strongly commended the parties for
coming together on the amendment. He supported the
amendment.
Co-Chair von Imhof WITHDREW her objection. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 3 was
ADOPTED.
10:14:16 AM
Senator Wilson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 4.
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Senator Wilson explained that the bill would remove public
convenience licenses and replaced them with a process for
municipalities to petition the ABC Board to issue
additional licenses above and beyond the population limits.
The amendment would amend the proposed changes to allow
local government positions to add restaurant licenses. The
amendment would allow cities to petition for more package
store licenses and would remove the necessity for proving
the population served by the city.
Senator Wilson continued to address the amendment and
discussed package stores. He explained that the only
municipalities able to petition for additional restaurant
licenses were first class cities, home rule municipalities
and boroughs. He mentioned commercial centers. He thought
it made sense to allow busines to expand within their
jurisdictions with police powers and zonings rather than
outside city limits. He thought the amendment would
encourage package stores to operate within city limits.
Senator Wilson spoke to population limits and the petition
process. He thought population limits were ineffective and
that there was no way to account for a population
surrounding an area that utilized a municipal center. He
thought the working group had acknowledged that population
limits would likely be inaccurate through the petition
process. He quoted the task force's recommendations for
statute change. He used the example of a person that
participated in economic activities in three different
cities in the Mat-Su area in one day. He thought if a
municipality had the capacity to deal with additional
licenses, it should be able to do so. He supported local
control of a municipality driving its own economic future.
He asked for support for the amendment.
10:17:53 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof asserted that population limits were
addressed in the bill, and referenced slide 21 of the
presentation at the previous bill hearing. She referenced
page 66 of the Alaska Title 4 Review. She understood that
the collaborative effort of the major stakeholders had
addressed population centers. She asked if Senator Wilson
had vetted the amendment with the Brewer's Guild, CHARR,
and DHSS.
Senator Wilson asserted that the three entities listed were
not the only stakeholders. He considered municipalities and
communities were major stakeholders. He stated he had a
draft letter of support from the Alaska Municipal League.
He discussed population surveys. He thought signatures had
been de-validated in the City of Soldotna. He cited that
there were more people that worked in the City of Wasilla
than lived in the city. He mentioned a food security issue.
He was concerned with economic growth.
10:20:48 AM
Senator Micciche stated that the municipalities were a
valuable part of the stakeholder's process that had worked
on the bill. He discussed population counts and alcohol
licensing and did not see an issue. The bill allowed for
petition for additional licenses. He thought there needed
to be sound systems in place. He noted that the bill
allowed for petition pertaining to the seasonal increase in
population. He referenced Senator Wielechowski's earlier
comments on dip netters. He thought the bill contained a
viable compromise.
Senator Micciche continued to address the amendment. He
thought the legislature should not be driving policy based
on one potential business that might be moving to an area.
He thought there were adequate processes in place. He
supported the bill's expansion of the ability for
municipalities to have some control of additional licenses.
10:23:38 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof agreed that the issue had already been
vetted. The issue had been presented to the committee
during the bill presentation, and she felt comfortable with
the level of addressing the topic and the flexibility in
the bill.
Co-Chair von Imhof MAINTAINED her objection.
Senator Wilson could name 8 businesses that wanted to move
to a growing area of the state.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Hoffman, Wilson
OPPOSED: Bishop, Wielechowski, von Imhof
The MOTION FAILED (2/3).
10:25:04 AM
AT EASE
10:25:29 AM
RECONVENED
Senator Wilson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 5.
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Senator Wilson spoke to the amendment. He noted that the
current bill had a three-year cooling off period for
municipalities if granted extra licenses through the
petition process. The amendment proposed to have a one-year
cooling off period. If a city petitioned for five licenses
and was only granted one, the cooling off period would
apply to the other four license. He thought a one-year
period would give a community to adjust to new licenses and
allow it to accommodate for dynamic population changes. He
thought the amendment proposed a more moderate change and
would improve the petition process.
Co-Chair von Imhof asked if Senator Micciche wanted to
comment on the amendment.
10:27:02 AM
AT EASE
10:27:57 AM
RECONVENED
Senator Wilson thought that it was necessary to have more
time to talk with other members and share history and
information on the topic of the amendment. He would offer
the amendment at a later time and date.
Senator Wilson WITHDREW Amendment 5. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Senator Bishop had not heard all of the questions regarding
Amendment 1. He wanted to comment that he had contacted all
the stakeholders and the groups were fine with the
amendment.
Co-Chair von Imhof asked for agency commentary as to
whether the adopted amendments would necessitate a revision
in the fiscal notes.
10:29:23 AM
GLEN KLINKHART, INTERIM DIRECTOR, ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA
CONTROL OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (via teleconference), did not think
that the adopted amendments would be cause for changes in
the fiscal note.
10:30:03 AM
NANCY MEADE, GENERAL COUNSEL, ALASKA COURT SYSTEM,
testified that the amendments would not cause changes to
the fiscal note.
10:30:23 AM
MATT DAVIDSON, PROGRAM OFFICER, DIVISION OF JUVENILE
JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, informed
that the amendments would not have an impact on the fiscal
notes.
10:30:48 AM
BRANDON SPANOS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TAX DIVISION, DEPARTMENT
OF REVENUE, testified that there would be no change to the
fiscal note.
Co-Chair von Imhof stated that it had been her intent to
move the bill from committee. The bill still needed to pass
through the other body. She wanted a quick discussion about
member's comfort level with moving the bill.
10:31:33 AM
AT EASE
10:31:55 AM
REVONV
Co-Chair von Imhof remarked that the bill had been a multi-
year process. The concepts in the bill had been vetted by
the committee in previous legislation. The bill had been
vetted by many stakeholders in collaboration over many
years. She mentioned some stakeholders. She felt
comfortable moving the bill from committee.
Senator Bishop MOVED to report CSSB 52(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSSB 52(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with two "do
pass" recommendations, two "no recommendation"
recommendations, and one "amend" recommendation; and with
one new fiscal impact note from the Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development, one indeterminate
fiscal note from the Department of Revenue, one fiscal
impact note from the Judiciary, and one statement of zero
fiscal impact for the Department of Commerce, Community and
Economic Development and the Department of Health and
Social Services.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 52 Public Testimony Girdwood Brewing Company.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 Public Testimony Darwin's Theory.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 Public Testimony The Banks Alehouse.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 Public Testimony Devil's Club Brewing Co..pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 Public Testimony Alaska Cache Liquor.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 v.K Amendments SFIN 2020 #1-5.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 Public Testimony Cynosure Brewing.pdf |
SFIN 2/19/2020 9:00:00 AM |
SB 52 |