Legislature(2015 - 2016)BUTROVICH 205
03/30/2015 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing: Alaska Gasline Development Corporation: Board of Directors | |
| SB70 | |
| SB50 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 70 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| SB 50 | |||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 50-AIDEA: BONDS;PROGRAMS;LOANS;LNG PROJECT
4:48:46 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SB 50. [CSSB
50(NRG) was before the committee.]
4:49:12 PM
GENE THERRIAULT, Deputy Director, Alaska Energy Authority (AEA),
Fairbanks, Alaska, introduced himself and noted that Mr. Parady
would start the presentation on SB 50.
4:49:20 PM
FRED PARADY, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development (DCCED), Juneau, Alaska, said
that Administrative Order 272 directed the DCCED commissioner to
collaborate and facilitate at the highest levels work on
consumer energy issues across Alaska, but of more germane to
this committee and this bill to work on the Interior Energy
Project (IEP) to provide affordable energy to Interior Alaska
customers as soon as possible and to possibly provide for gas
elsewhere after the Interior was supplied and to use private
sector mechanisms as much as possible. The goal was initially
envisioned to deliver natural gas to Interior homes with a
$15/thousand cubic feet at the burner tip cost (the energy
equivalent of $2/gallon fuel oil).
4:50:55 PM
MR. TERRIAULT stated that much of the language in the bill makes
adjustments to a number Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority (AIDEA) bond and loan authorizations. Sections 4 and 5
of the bill apply to the Interior Energy Project and so he would
discuss those changes when they came up.
He explained that section 1 adjusts an authorization requirement
that has been in place since 1990. The original amount of $6
million was set for AIDEA bonding needing approval for the
citing of the project from the local government. That is being
proposed to go up to $10 million.
Section 2 on page 2 deals with the bonding authorization for $10
million that has been on the books since 1990 and the proposal
is to adjust it up to $25 million to account for inflation, the
size of typical projects coming to AIDEA for participation, and
to bring a number of sections of statute up to the same dollar
amount.
4:52:57 PM
The $25 million new suggested level appears in section 3, also.
Section 3 deals with AIDEA's ability to issue loans out of the
Enterprise Development Account and that was set in 2006 at $20
million. On line 30, the existing $20 million amount for the
original Sustainable Energy Transmission and Supply (SETS) fund
is proposed to go up to $25 million, also.
4:53:56 PM
Page 3 has existing statutory language with no proposed change.
Page 4 starts dealing with the Interior Energy project. Section
4 was added by the Senate Energy Committee. Senator Micciche, in
particular, was very interested if the Interior was going to
look for a source of natural gas and potentially look to the
Cook Inlet area to source those gas molecules, in AIDEA
evaluating the possibility of delivering those molecules on a
small diameter pipeline.
AEA committed to working with Enstar on the pricing of such an
enterprise and the manufacture of Flex steel pipe and has
provided information to Senator Micciche indicating that it
looks like that type of delivery would be severely economically
challenged, although it would continue to be evaluated.
Suggested language deals with a previous prohibition in the SETS
statutes that precluded SETS money from being used for a natural
gas pipeline. This exemption is structured to specifically say
they can look at a 12 inch or smaller pipeline to potentially
deliver gas to the Interior.
4:55:44 PM
Section 5 proposes changing the financing tools that were
previously approved by the legislature for the Interior Energy
Project. Language on page 5, line 4, deletes the North Slope as
the only source of gas molecules. It appears that delivery price
off the North Slope would not be economical for the community to
pay for conversion, and if you can't get demand up, then the
per-unit price will be prohibitive. This doesn't preclude the
possibility that North Slope gas still could be a solution or
part of a solution, but it opens it up for AIDEA and AEA,
through the IEP process, to look at the possibility of sourcing
the gas molecules elsewhere in the state. The expectation is
that producers in Cook Inlet could come forward with private
partners that could propose a delivered price that would get the
needed number of conversions in the Interior.
As the North Slope language was removed, there was some concern
by Interior delegation members that that would just open up a
project that gets developed in the Cook Inlet that is targeted
at serving Western or Southeast Alaska. So, the drafter
recommended using Interior Alaska as being the "primary market,"
but secondary markets could be served by this infrastructure,
because serving other needs would make the per unit price for
everybody go down.
4:58:58 PM
Language on line 5 talks about a distribution system in Interior
Alaska, and through RCA action the state has two certified
utility gas distribution systems. That is why "s" was added.
Sections 6 and 7 clean up old existing AIDEA bond
authorizations; section 6 repeals an unused bond authorization
that was part of airline maintenance facilities at the Anchorage
Airport. He explained that part of the bond authorization was
not used and once they get passed a certain age AIDEA won't use
them, because they are "stale," but because they remain on the
books as a possible debt to the authority, bond counsel has
advised that they need to be taken into consideration when new
ratings are done for the entity, and their suggestion was to
clean up the old authorizations. Section 7 has a number of old
authorizations that were never used but are being proposed to be
just be taken off the books. Section 8 is an immediate effective
date.
5:00:38 PM
MR. THERRIAULT explained that it is standard now that new bond
authorizations for potential projects have a five-year sunset
date, so this goes away as an issue.
SENATOR STOLTZE noted the history of AIDEA's failures had been
from legislative involvement in micromanagement, and he wants
the parts of the bill that didn't come from the Industrial
Authority to be thoroughly vetted.
MR. THERRIAULT said that language just allows the authority to
consider it; it doesn't direct that it be selected. So, AEA's
view is that would probably have been part of the due diligence
in delivering a better smarter way to do it to the Interior.
SENATOR COGHILL asked him to bring a table of authority repeals
to the next meeting.
MR. THERRIAULT said the governor's transmittal letter for the
legislation has a list of them.
CHAIR GIESSEL thanked Mr. Therriault for the explanation and
announced she would hold SB 50 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Resume-AGDC Board - Paskvan #6.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
|
| SB 70 Briefing Paper .pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70 DNR Responses to Senator Coghill 03-17-2015.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70 Amendment 1 03-30-2015.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| Fiscal Note-SB0070-1-2-030615-DNR-N.PDF |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70 Supporting Document- (LAS 30116 AGDC Geotech State Parks Permit final signed 2015).pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70-Supporting Document-MapCaptainCookSRA_11x17_150224.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70-Supporting Document-Map-Denali_11x17_150225r.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70-Supporting Document-Map-Nancy_Lake_SRA_11x17_150224.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB 70-Supporting Document-Map-WillowCreek_11x17_150224.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| SB50 CS NRG Version W 03-27-2015.PDF |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Fiscal Note-DCCED-AIDEA-Zero-2-11-15.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Governor's transmittal letter.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Summary of Changes ver A to ver W.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/10/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Supporting Documents-Fbks Chamber of Commerce-Letter 03-09-2015.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Supporting Documents-FEDCO Ltr.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Supporting Documents-FNSB Resolution 2015-08 02-26-2015.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50 Supporting Documents-Furie LLC letter 3-2015.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/10/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB 50 Letter of Support Merrick Peirce.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/10/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB 50 NRG ver W fact sheet.pdf |
SRES 3/30/2015 3:30:00 PM SRES 4/3/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |