Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
04/09/2025 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB50 | |
| HB171 | |
| HB70 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 50 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 70 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 50-MUNICIPAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS: HOUSING
3:17:49 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that the first order of business would
be CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 50(L&C), "An Act relating to the
comprehensive plans of first and second class boroughs."
3:18:17 PM
SENATOR FORREST DUNBAR, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, gave closing remarks on CSSB 50(L&C). He stated that
CSSB 50(L&C) would add a housing development plan to Title 29,
which would encourage but not require first- and second-class
boroughs to prioritize housing development in their
comprehensive plans.
3:18:57 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS opened public testimony on CSSB 50(L&C).
3:19:08 PM
ANNA BRAWLEY, Community Planner, testified in support of SB 50.
She stated that she was a planning professional who had worked
in communities across Alaska. She stated that SB 50 would
connect two important roles of local government: creating
community visions and goals and taking action to meet housing as
a community need. She explained that comprehensive plans, when
done well, can build "community consensus ... through practical
strategies." She stated that comprehensive plans entail land
use, transportation, infrastructure, economic development, and
public lands and facilities; at the intersection of these, she
asserted, was housing. She stated that, because housing
challenges can differ from community to community, the solutions
should be locally crafted and enacted. She listed potential
challenges to housing: cost of construction, availability of
land, aging housing stock, necessity of major repair,
overcrowding, individuals living in deteriorated buildings,
aging residents looking to downsize, new residents looking for
homes to buy, affordable rental units, et cetera. She
reiterated that the local comprehensive planning process allows
communities to address challenges unique to their area. She
stated that comprehensive plans can include creating a new plan,
updating data and demographic trends, adopting a targeted
housing strategy, or picking priorities in a pre-existing plan.
She concluded by offering her support and asserting that the
proposed legislation encourages, but does not prescribe, how the
community plans housing.
3:22:06 PM
MS. BRAWLEY, in response to Representative Carrick, replied that
she had previously worked with the City of Valdez after it had
updated its comprehensive plan. She reported that about a
quarter of the housing stock in Valdez were mobile homes from
the pipeline era. She reported that residents in Valdez wanted
to buy homes but were unable to afford them. She stated that
she worked with the community on updating the zoning codes as a
way to remove barriers to housing. She said that Valdez was a
great example of a community using its comprehensive plan to
identify housing as a focus and follow-through on
implementation.
3:23:43 PM
MARGE STONEKING, Advocacy Director, AARP Alaska, stated that
AARP is the largest non-profit, non-partisan membership
organization in Alaska and the United States, stating that
AARP's mission is to "empower people to choose how they live as
they age." She stated that housing is critical for aging
residents in Alaska. She asserted that much improvement is
needed, from availability to cost attainability, to
accessibility. She stated that it was crucial to address
demographic shifts in population, noting that the population of
older adults in the U.S. continues to increase. She cited
AARP's Home & Community Preference Survey, reporting that the
vast majority of older adults prefer to live in their own homes
long-term. She further reported that two-thirds of adults aged
50 years and older live in single-family homes and 85 percent
own the homes that they live in. She also reported that less
than 5 percent of houses in the U.S. have the accommodations
necessary for moderate mobility difficulties. She noted that
Alaska has fastest growing aging population in the nation and,
because of this, it was critical to include housing development
plans in comprehensive planning processes. She asserted housing
should include a range of size and price, and accessibility
options. She asserted that SB 50 would provide a good
opportunity for statewide encouragement of housing development
to local jurisdictions.
3:26:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether municipal housing plans
should include requirements for accessible accommodation.
MS. STONEKING replied that the requirement was likely beyond the
scope of SB 50 but noted that AARP advocates for a percentage of
local housing development to incorporate universal design.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether a housing plan would
include requirements for a percentage of housing to include
accessible accommodations.
SENATOR DUNBAR, in response to Representative Saddler's question
regarding requirements under SB 50, stated that the proposed
bill would not mandate the inclusion of accessible
accommodation, but certain local jurisdictions do have some
provisions for accessible accommodation. He cited Title 21 in
Anchorage, Alaska, as an example. He commented that he was not
aware of any requirement in Alaska mandating a certain
percentage of housing including accessible accommodation. He
further cited Holtan Hills in Girdwood as an example, noting
that they set aside a portion of housing for low-income
individuals. He reiterated that SB 50 would not give any
additional powers or place any additional requirements on local
governments.
3:28:36 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS, after ascertaining that there was no one else
who wished to testify, closed public testimony on CSSB 50(L&C).
3:28:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether there were any local
governments that require housing to have particular
accommodations.
3:29:24 PM
SALLY COX, Local Government Specialist, Division of Community &
Regional Affairs, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic
Development (DCCED), at the invitation of Co-Chair Fields,
replied that she would get back to committee with a response.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS entertained a motion.
3:29:58 PM
CO-CHAIR HALL moved to report CSSB 50(L&C) out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, CSSB 50(L&C) was reported out of the
House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 70 Amendment 1 (I.5).pdf |
HL&C 4/9/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| HB 70 Amendment 2 (I.7).pdf |
HL&C 4/9/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| CCAlaska HB171 Oppose4925.pdf |
HL&C 4/9/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 GuardYourCard_Alaska_Toolkit_4.8.25.pdf |
HL&C 4/9/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Opposition - 2025-04 AK deck v1.pptx |
HL&C 4/9/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| 2025-04-07 AK HB171 EPC written testimony.pdf |
HL&C 4/9/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 171 |