Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/02/1995 01:35 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SL&C - 2/2/95
SB 47 APUC EXTENSION AND REGULATORY COST CHARGE
Number 108
SENATOR KELLY introduced SB 47 as the next order of business before
the committee.
JOSH FINK, Legislative Aide to Senator Kelly, informed the
committee that SB 47 is the reintroduction of SB 213 of the
Eighteenth Legislature. He explained that SB 47 would extend the
Alaska Public Utilities Commission (APUC) currently in its sunset
year and it would restore the Regulatory Cost Charge (RCC) which
has expired.
SENATOR KELLY clarified that SB 47 extends the sunset and the
provisions agreed upon the previous two years. Any other issue
with the APUC would be handled in APUC II.
JOSH FINK summarized the sectional information contained in the
committee packets.
Number 250
SENATOR SALO asked why a year was needed to make the transition
that the language change in Section 1 specified, from "liberally
construed" to "all things necessary and reasonably implied." JOSH
FINK explained that some utilities felt that the language granted
too broad a power to the Commission while others thought that
express power was needed. The year allows the Commission to assess
what this change means and how to deal with it.
ALYCE HANLEY, APUC, expressed appreciation to Senator Kelly in
drafting and presenting SB 47. The Commission is in a tenuous
position until SB 47 is passed because employees do not know their
fate. As of April 1st the Commission's position worsens because
ninety day periods of due process will no longer be available. She
pointed out that an extension of APUC and the reenacting of the RCC
as well as the new effective date are supported by APUC. She
expressed concern with the language change in Section 1. The new
language is the reason for the $60,000 fiscal note; the money would
cover increased litigation due to challenges of the meaning of the
language. She recommended, speaking on behalf of the APUC,
deletion of Section 1. She urged movement of the bill.
SENATOR MILLER asked which parties were those that compromised on
Section 1, if the APUC is suggesting that section's deletion. JOSH
FINK stated that he believed that the compromise was between APUC
and other groups. This change occurred in the Senate Finance
Committee.
SENATOR MILLER urged the APUC to review its position in order not
to slow this legislation. ALYCE HANLEY said that the Commission's
main concern was to deal with this quickly. She reiterated the
Commission's preference to keep the original language of Section 1,
however, she recognized that in order for SB 47 to move quickly
that may not happen.
Number 349
SENATOR MILLER inquired as to the reasoning behind the increase in
staff by one a year and the budget by $300,000 a year reflected in
the fiscal note. ALYCE HANLEY believed that it was due to a
recommendation when the Commission put the budget together.
DON SCHOER explained that the budget and personnel increases are
the result of the guidelines from Juneau on how to compute the five
year statistics including three and a half percent inflation and
expected population growth. He urged quick action and no
amendments.
JIM ROWE, Executive Director of the Alaska Telephone Association,
discussed the history of SB 47 and the compromises that it
contains. He expressed disappointment that the legislation was
not passed last year. He stated the Association's support of SB 47
in its present form.
Number 396
JIMMY JACKSON, GCI, reiterated that the main priority is quick
passage of legislation reauthorizing APUC. He felt that a prompt
reauthorization of the APUC would be in the best interest of the
public. He expressed the need to have the issue of reauthorization
in separate legislation. SB 47 addresses many issues as well as
reauthorization of APUC. The language change in Section 1 of SB 47
is not in the best interest of the public. He stated that the
world of utilities changes quickly and the Commission needs to
adjust accordingly. The Commission cannot wait to receive
authority from the legislature when problems arise that need to be
solved quickly. He indicated that the new legislature should
review the APUC.
SENATOR KELLY stated that SB 47 would not receive too many
amendments in this committee. He explained that APUC II had been
introduced and hearings would be held on that legislation in order
to deal with the amendments then.
SENATOR SALO asked if the discussion over the language change in
Section 1 of SB 47 would occur with APUC II. SENATOR KELLY
anticipated that the language would not become a part of APUC II if
it remains in SB 47.
SENATOR MILLER moved SB 47 out of committee with individual
recommendations. Without objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|