Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/20/1996 01:45 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SL&C 2/20/96
SB 43 ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS
SENATOR KELLY announced SB 43 to be up for consideration. He said
he heard of an additional problem that had just come up.
SENATOR LEMAN, sponsor of SB 43, said one of the differences in the
"f" version and the bill they heard last year was in section 1.
Last year the Board requested flexibility for "a governor's
appointment of an engineer" and that had been changed to "two civil
engineers, and the three other engineering positions would be
selected from other branches of the profession. The mining
engineers who are currently named in statute objected. As an
alternative the bill offers to say that one engineer be selected
from mining, chemical, or petroleum engineering, the three smallest
categories, as opposed to electrical, mechanical, and civil. This
would assure that at all times there would be a mining, chemical,
or petroleum engineer on the Board.
The other change, SENATOR LEMAN said, is in section four, which
Senator Duncan had suggested, to provide for a retired status
registration. It would not authorize practice, but would enable
retired engineers to have a procedure whereby they could become
active, if they wanted to. He thought that reflected well on the
many engineers who have retired in this State who would like to
maintain their license without necessarily paying the full fee each
year.
Version "g" is different only in section 1 which is deleted.
SENATOR LEMAN said it has been increasingly difficult, because of
the small category of mining engineers, to find someone who is
willing and able to serve. He said the Board spends a lot of time
reviewing applications for registration and it leaves the smallest
category with a mining engineer with the least amount of work to
do, because there aren't that many new people applying for
registration in mining engineering. There are many in the
categories of civil, mechanical, and electrical.
Number 300
SENATOR KELLY asked the Committee if they had a version preference.
SENATOR MILLER said he preferred the "g" version.
SENATOR KELLY asked if there were any other changes from the
original bill in the "g" version. SHERMAN ERNOUF, Legislative Aide
to Senator Tim Kelly, said the "Duncan amendment" was the only one.
SENATOR SALO asked what was the composition of the panel. SENATOR
LEMAN replied that it would be one person who is experienced in the
settlement of disputes, one attorney, and one professional
architect, engineer, or land surveyor.
SENATOR SALO asked, regarding section 4, if the retired status
people with a license for a continuing practice, could serve on the
panel. SENATOR LEMAN said he didn't think so the way the bill is
currently written. SENATOR SALO remarked that they would probably
be very good to serve on a panel. SENATOR LEMAN agreed saying he
would want to look at that further, but thought that they should
have had to practice in Alaska before serving.
Number 338
SENATOR MILLER moved to adopt the version "g" committee substitute.
There were no objections and it was so ordered.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked for clarification on how the committee
substitute was different other than the retired status. SENATOR
LEMAN replied that sections 1 and 2 are revisor's changes. Section
4 is the insertion of the word "or" on page 3, line 2. The
Department of Law said it is difficult to enforce the Board's
statutes without that word unless a person violates all three of
the provisions.
Section 5 was brought to the Board by the land surveyors. It takes
out the exemption of land surveying teaching in a post secondary
educational institution. The institution would have to have a
registered land surveyor. They need this to elevate the status of
land surveying. There are also some definition changes in the
practice of land surveying that bring it more up to date with
current practice.
Number 369
MIKE TAURIANIAN, Soldotna, said he supported the concept of the
bill. His concern was the small number of mining engineers to pick
from, roughly five percent of all engineers, and the difficulty in
not only getting someone to serve, but in providing geographical
distribution. Electrical and mechanical engineers are about 33
percent of the total. So he requested restoring that language,
dropping mining engineer and adding "three engineers from other
branches of the profession of engineering."
SENATOR KELLY said this committee had already made a policy call on
that language, but this bill will go through several more
committees and he would have an opportunity to address that issue
again.
MR. TAURIANIAN said he supported the retired status and he hoped
language would be adopted regarding the engineers who come to
Alaska and retire without working here first.
Number 406
MERLE JANTZ, Vice Chairman, AELS Board, said they recently voted
unanimously to support SB 43. He said he was very glad they are
looking at the retired status issue.
Regarding section 1, he felt that they need the expertise while
reviewing applications. SENATOR KELLY explained they had already
made that policy call and he could testify on that issue in the
next committee of referral.
SHARON MACKLIN, Alaska Professional Design Council, said there has
been a concern raised having to do with the land surveying issue.
SENATOR DUNCAN questioned language in section 1 of "g". SENATOR
LEMAN noted that the other section was the one he considered to be
a revisor's section, because it was referring to an entity that
doesn't exist anymore. He wanted to hear what the Board wanted to
do to establish evidence of practice for registration. He thought
it would be consistent with some of the changes in sections 5 and
6 about upgrading the profession of land surveying.
SENATOR KELLY commented that upgrading and closing the door might
be a touchy subject. He asked if by deleting that language,
engineers could be required to have more than eight years
experience before they get a license. SENATOR LEMAN replied that
it would be the equivalent of what the Board requires of other
professions.
SENATOR DUNCAN said he was concerned with the necessity of that
section.
SENATOR KELLY asked if anyone else wanted to testify on this bill.
BARBARA HUFF, Teamsters Local 959, said they have concerns with the
amount of time they are looking at with land surveyors. She
requested that their staff who actually head up the land surveyors
school in Anchorage, a four year program, have an opportunity to
discuss this issue further. Their major concern is the additional
training could negatively impact rural individuals and their
ability to get fully trained or qualified in the field and to be
able to function in that profession.
SENATOR KELLY said he did not want to hold up the bill
unnecessarily, but he wanted to see that question addressed before
the bill left the Committee and said they would hear it again next
Tuesday.
SENATOR DUNCAN noted that they should also look at the retired
status language so people couldn't just move to the State and get
retired status.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|