Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/07/1995 01:35 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SL&C - 3/7/95
SB 43 ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS
SENATOR LEMAN, sponsor of SB 43, made the following comments. He
introduced the bill at the request of the AELS Board which they
consider their omnibus housekeeping measure. The same bill was on
the senate floor last year but did not pass because of the utility
issue. Section 1 deletes the requirement that one of the seven
members of the board be a mining engineer. The intention is not to
take anything away from the mining profession in the state of
Alaska, but to be more reflective of the categories of engineers.
It has become increasingly difficult for the governor to find a
mining engineer to serve on the board. The deletion does not
prevent the appointment of a mining engineer; it no longer requires
it. Section 2 gives the board the flexibility to design comparable
requirements including both education and experience. Section 3
deletes reference to a council that no longer exists. Section 4
adds the word "or" on line 27 to allow the board to take action
against a person meeting any one of the conditions. Section 5
requires that teachers of land surveying at a postsecondary
education institution be registered land surveyors. Section 6 adds
a definition of the practice of teaching land surveying at an
institution of higher learning. This allows a person to use that
experience to count toward registration qualifications. It also
makes other definitional changes to bring the definition of land
surveying current with existing practice.
Number 284
MICHAEL KENNY, representing the Technical Engineers of Alaska,
Local 959, testified against SB 43, particularly Section 2, which
deletes the statutory requirement for an individual to show
evidence of no more than eight years of a combination of education,
experience or training. He noted in his experience, people with
a combination of six or seven years of experience in construction
and land surveying are more than minimally qualified to take the
land surveyor examination. He stated if this statutory requirement
is removed, the comparable amount for engineering is 12 years, and
he feels that is an extreme amount of experience to require for the
minimal qualifications to take the land surveyor test. He
expressed concern that Section 6 would affect contractors
installing water and sewer lines, and curbs and gutters, and would
require those people to be licensed land surveyors.
Gerry Kurtz, a licensed land surveyor, testified in opposition to
SB 43. He felt the current board is unnecessarily weighted in
favor of engineers. Out of nine board members, only one is a
surveyor. He would prefer to see two engineers, two architects,
two surveyors and one public member comprise the board. Regarding
Section 2, he was opposed to the deletion of the eight year
provision. He felt people with eight years of training should be
allowed to take the exam. He stated making the work experience
requirement 12 years would scare people away from the profession
and would discriminate against certain members who, through
tradition, have not been college trained, primarily native people.
He believed Section 5 is discriminatory to land surveyors and felt
college administrators should be given the leeway to hire whomever
they feel is qualified. He agreed with Mr. Kenney that Section 6
may take away work traditionally performed well by other people.
He felt SB 43 to be unnecessary, and that a good exam and testing
procedure designed by the AELS Board would solve any problems.
Number 181
STEVE BORELL, representing the Alaska Miners' Association (AMA),
commented on Section 1. The AMA opposed the change as there are
many ways in which mining applications provide for different
aspects of engineering than in other fields.
COLIN MAYNARD, Alaska Professional Design Council, testified in
support of SB 43 as the bill cleans up problems in the current
statute. He noted the change in Section 1 would make it much
easier to find people to serve on the board. He commented mining
engineers want to secure a spot on the board but they do not want
to be governed by their regulations. Regarding the board
composition, he felt if all types of engineers were represented,
the board would be too large and costly. He commented the land
surveyor provisions were requested by the ASPLS to require higher
qualifications for land surveyors, possibly because of the large
number of claims made to the AELS board. He noted the university
requested the provision for teacher qualifications be reinstated in
SB 99 after it had been removed four years ago. He agreed teachers
in higher level design courses should have experience in design and
in the practice. He explained it would still be possible to teach
at a postsecondary institution without the qualifications if
supervision by a licensed land surveyor is available, and that
experience would count toward licensure.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|