Legislature(1993 - 1994)
03/08/1993 09:20 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 43(RES):
An Act establishing a grant program relating to
transplantation of elk; and providing for an effective
date.
C0-CHAIR DRUE PEARCE announced that CSSB 43(RES) was before
the committee and invited Senator Robin Taylor, sponsor of
the bill, to join the committee at the table. A work draft
dated March 3, 1993 was distributed for the committee's
review.
SENATOR STEVE RIEGER MOVED for adoption of the CSSB 43 work
draft dated March 3, 1993. No objections having been
raised, the CSSB 43 work draft dated March 3, 1993 was
ADOPTED.
SENATOR ROBIN TAYLOR asked the committee to consider the
work draft in lieu of the original bill. He said he feared
that the Department of Fish & Game (DF&G) would not perform
a follow up on the previously successful transplant of elk
as specified in the original bill. He said since the recent
transplant in 1987, or as long ago as 1927, when elk had
been transplanted to Afognak Island, that DF&G had made no
effort to study the effect of elk on indigenous species.
Even though studies have not been done, DF&G still maintains
that a study is needed to determine if competition exists
between elk and other deer families. He felt DF&G had
already reached the conclusion that elk and deer compete for
the same food. He maintained that DF&G felt the elk
transplant would fail and it had not. He wanted DF&G to
start managing the existing elk population and determine
when the first hunt might be sustained. He suggested that
the elk could provide a source of food for the residents of
southeast Alaska, and could cut trails through which deer
and other game could pass. He maintained that deer and elk
seemed to be able to co-exist quite well. CSSB 43 would
make it mandatory for DF&G to transplant a certain number of
elk on Kruzof Island, Gravina Island, Cleveland Peninsula,
and Prince of Wales Island in a specified period of time.
He estimated that it would cost approximately $1,000 per
animal.
Senator Taylor passed to the committee photographs and
showed a video of existing transplanted elk. He informed
the committee that in 1987, of the 52 elk transplanted,
approximately half survived. He estimated that the elk
population today is approximately 100 to 120 animals.
SENATOR JAY KERTTULA pointed out that CSSB 43 called for an
appropriation but asked if there would be any public
contribution. Senator Taylor maintained that there would be
a significant local contribution and effort, even though
CSSB 43 did not contain the 50 percent match or grant
language of the original bill. Senator Kerttula asked if
there was any additional cost other than the handling cost
of $1,000 per animal. Senator Taylor said that the state
may have to exchange goats for the elk as was done in the
past transplant but that $1,000 per animal should include
veterinarian costs, crates, etc.
SENATOR TIM KELLY asked for clarification on the cost of the
transplant of the elk and asked if the state was funding the
transplant at 100 percent. Senator Taylor said that he
would appropriate any additional funding needed out of
discretionary funds to complete the transplant. Senator
Taylor explained that if the state had to fund it at 100
percent it would not happen. He projected that
approximately 50 percent of the cost would be funded by
volunteer labor and contributions as it had in the last
transplant.
DARSIE BECK, Alaska Environmental Lobby, spoke in opposition
to CSSB 43, on the grounds that transplanting elk was a
biological threat, and that the economic costs and potential
impact on subsistence users far outweighed any benefits. He
said introduction of foreign species into a eco-system
frequently have disastrous ecological and economic
consequences. He offered examples in other parts of the
world of the damage it has caused. He said that wildlife
biologists they have talked to do not endorse CSSB 43. The
greatest threat seems to be the spread of disease to other
wild animals and humans. He said that transplant figures
from DF&G showed that the cost per elk was $5,000. He
called the committee's attention to page 2 of the fiscal
note for DF&G that said "costs for a five year program to
accomplish the above goals would range from $200.0 to $250.0
per year." The Alaska Environmental Lobby suggested it
would be less expensive for the state of Alaska to fund elk
hunting trips for individuals outside the state than to
transplant elk.
Discussion followed between Senators Kerttula, Kelly, Taylor
and Mr. Beck regarding various diseases, their transmission,
and whether elk were indigenous to Alaska.
SENATOR BERT SHARP MOVED for passage of CSSB 43(FIN) from
committee with the accompanying fiscal note. No objections
having been raised, CSSB 43(FIN) was REPORTED OUT of
committee with a zero fiscal note for the Department of Fish
& Game. Co-chairs Pearce, Frank, and Senator Sharp signed
the committee report with a "do pass" recommendation.
Senators Kerttula, Kelly, Jacko and Rieger signed a "no
recommendation."
Recess 9:35am
Reconvene 9:37am
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|