Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/27/2000 03:25 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 38-OIL & GAS AUDITS
CHAIRMAN HALFORD announced SB 38 to be up for consideration.
MR. KEVIN BANKS, Division of Oil and Gas, DNR, said SB 38 is a
housekeeping bill that transfers the authority to audit royalty
revenue that comes to DNR via lease contracts and other methods
from the Department of Revenue (DOR) to DNR. It also provides DNR
with tools to conduct the audits effectively. DNR's current
statute (AS 38) has a confidentiality requirement but it contains
no criminal penalties for misconduct. Under SB 38, DNR's audit
requirements would be tighter and would reflect those in AS 43,
which governs the audits done by DOR.
SB 38 also gives subpoena authority to DNR when conducting an
audit, which DOR now has. The fiscal note reflects a cost of
$233,000 to pay for the transfer of staff from DOR to DNR.
CHAIRMAN HALFORD asked why the money in the fiscal note is listed
as permanent fund corporate receipts.
MR. BANKS replied that's because last year DOR identified the
positions as funded with permanent fund revenue. Those same funds
will be coming DNR's way.
CHAIRMAN HALFORD said he would want to know that the permanent fund
is the potential beneficiary to determine whether that is the right
funding source.
MR. BANKS explained that DNR has some staff who "check the
checkers" on current audits. They are also doing contract reviews
for royalty settlements and looking at various royalty and kinds of
audits that are not now covered by AS 43. With the combination of
staff, including those from DOR, it would approximately equal the
portion of the revenue stream that goes to the permanent fund,
about 27 percent of their royalty revenue. After transfer of this
authority, they would have seven or eight people on staff doing
audits. Three of them would be funded by this $233,000.
CHAIRMAN HALFORD asked if three-eighths of the activity is to the
benefit of the permanent fund.
MR. BANKS agreed that is about right but it is possible that more
is coming out of the permanent fund than it receives in terms of
benefits. He said it is a hard number to arrive at.
SENATOR GREEN asked if SB 38 will allow DNR and DOR to exchange
information and thereby increase the exposure of very confidential
information to more eyes or whether that is not a consideration in
this bill.
MR. BANKS replied that under current law, DNR has access to audit
reports and summaries. In addition, according to Department of Law
opinions written in the 1980's, for the purposes of conducting
DNR's royalty function, DNR should have access to any information
it deems necessary. His staff would have to meet the requirements
for maintaining confidentiality of information received from DOR
and be subject to AS 43 criminal penalties.
CHAIRMAN HALFORD said it looks like, in either case, the penalty is
a felony for disclosing the information. He said he didn't have
any trouble with this legislation but would hold it until
Wednesday.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|