Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/01/2012 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB119 | |
| SB38 | |
| SB83 | |
| SB115 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 38 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 38
"An Act establishing a one-time occupational death
benefit for peace officers and firefighters."
9:33:16 AM
Senator Meyer stated that SB 38 would provide a one-time
payment of $100,000 occupational death benefit established
in Section 2 of the draft bill. It would provide that the
payment may not be made to anyone but a surviving spouse of
a dependent child of a peace officer. He stressed that the
death of a peace officer was fairly rare in Alaska. He
noted several letters of support. He noted that the average
age of a peace officer who dies in the line of duty was 38-
years-old. He stressed that the bill was especially
important, because the officer may have small children that
needed financial support.
Co-Chair Hoffman wondered what other states programs were
in comparison to this bill. Senator Meyer stated that each
state had different programs. CHRISTINE MARASIGAN, STAFF,
SENATOR KEVIN MEYER, stated that 39 other states provided
similar benefit. She said the benefit ranged from $25,000
to $400,000.
Senator Egan requested an explanation of the fiscal note's
continual increase over time. Ms. Marasigan noted that
there was some information required related to liability.
She stressed that there was some actuary liability studies.
Senator Meyer added that there was anticipation of one
death per year.
9:38:49 AM
Senator Olson looked at the pension fund, and wondered if
the peace officers would be required to pay higher
insurance because of the potential of more deaths. Senator
Meyer believed that the money would be used from the
unfunded liability, meaning that the money was already
available.
Senator Olson wondered if there were other death benefits
for officers that die in the line of duty. Senator Meyer
replied that there were some life insurance benefits.
JIM PUCKETT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS,
introduced himself.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered what the tier 4 employees'
benefits would be. Mr. Puckett replied that they would
receive the DCR balance.
Co-Chair Stedman surmised that the benefit would be zero.
Mr. Puckett agreed to provide more information regarding
tier 4 employee benefits.
Co-Chair Stedman requested information regarding the
structure of the tier 4 benefits, because he would like to
look at the comparative differences between a new employee
and one that had been employed for 20 years. Mr. Puckett
explained that if there was a loss of life due to accident
on the job, there would be a life insurance benefit of
$100,000 and the Supplemental Benefit System (SBS). He
stated that he would provide further information regarding
new employees.
Senator Olson wondered when the benefits would begin
following the death. Mr. Puckett replied that basic life
insurance would occur immediately, and the check would be
disclosed within a week following the incident.
9:44:21 AM
Co-Chair Stedman requested written information in grid-form
regarding the tier system benefits and structures. Mr.
Puckett agreed to provide that information.
Senator Egan wondered if it there was an assumption of one
death per year, when the calculations were made. Mr.
Puckett replied that the one death per year was the basis
of the calculation.
Senator Egan wondered how the unfunded liability increased
$650,000. Mr. Puckett requested further information
regarding Senator Egan's reference of $650,000. Co-Chair
Stedman stated that it was in the Buck Analysis, second
paragraph last sentence. He felt that the accumulation of
expenditures was added to the negative side of the balance
sheet.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered who picked up the tab: the city
or the state. He explained that the state would be required
to provide the funds, because the cities were capped at 22
percent. He felt that there would be a broader discussion
related to that topic.
AARON DANIELSON, PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION,
testified in support of SB 38. He felt that the bill
addressed the families of the officer greatest concern. He
pointed out that the bill would provide peace of mind.
9:49:34 AM
CHRIS GIFFORD, MUNICIPAL CHAPTER PRESIDENT, PUBLIC SAFETY
EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, spoke in support of SB 38. He
stressed the importance of the benefit of the families of
the officers.
DEREK HSIEL, ANCHORAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE
ASSOCIATION, testified in support of SB 38. He focused on
the reality of death in the line of duty. He pointed out
that training for death was a requirement for peace
officers. The training was used to inoculate the
understanding of death. He pointed out that when officers
were killed in the line of duty, the work for the day
continued. He stressed that death was expensive, and
sometimes there were extra costs incurred by the family. He
stressed that sometimes business contributions off-set
costs, but smaller communities might not have that benefit.
9:54:10 AM
Senator McGuire noted that $100,000 might not be a
substantial amount of money. She wondered if there were any
scholarship opportunities for dependents. She hoped there
may be a possibility for a four-year scholarship for an in
state college for children. Mr. Hsiel pointed out some
benefits in the military. He felt that the added benefits
would be left to the legislature's discretion.
Senator McGuire requested more information regarding
scholarships, and noted a summary of the record of peace
officer deaths in Alaska. She also would like to see a
scholarship benefit possibility. Co-Chair Stedman noted
that those requests should be directed at the bill sponsor
and the Department of Public Safety.
9:59:14 AM
ERIC TUOTT, ANCHORAGE FIREFIGHTERS, testified in support of
SB 38. He stated that he was married with a three-year-old
daughter, so his family would be greatly affected if he was
killed in the line of duty. He stressed that deaths did not
happen frequently, but did occur occasionally.
LARRY SEMMENS, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF SOLDOTNA (via
teleconference), testified against SB 38. He stressed that
the employees were already covered by occupational death
benefits. If SB 38 passed, He thought it was a poor time to
add benefits that would increase the unfunded liability. He
indicated we should be working to reduce the unfunded
liability, and not add benefits.
Co-Chair Stedman pointed out the new fiscal impact note
from the Department of Administration, for a zero-cost in
FY 2013. However, the there was an anticipated $175,000
general fund increase in the annual employer contribution
amount beginning in FY 2014, with incremental increases in
the following years. He stressed that there would be an
impact on the unfunded liability.
10:07:23 AM
Senator Olson wondered what community contribution would
be. Senator Meyer replied that the local contribution was
currently 22 percent.
Senator McGuire referenced Title 14.43.085.
Senator Meyer thanked the committee.
SB 38 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
10:09:33 AM
AT EASE
10:13:39 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 119 Athletic Training Educational Overview.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Ltr of Supt AATA.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Support Letters 24.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Other States Chart Comparison.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 US Bureau of Labor Statistics Athletic Trainers.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 38 BuckConsultants Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Sectional.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Sponsor Statement v.A.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Support Ltr AK Prof Fire Fighters.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Support Ltr APDEA.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Support Ltr PSEA.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 83 sponsor statement Letterhead.docx |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 83 support documents.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 83 State_Profile_2011_AK.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 115 lttr supporting, ATT.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 115 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 115 lttr supporting, Liberty Mutual.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 115 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 119 CBPL Memo Final.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |