Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/29/2013 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB81 | |
| HB83 | |
| SB36 | |
| HB69 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | HB 69 | ||
SB 36-MISSING VULNERABLE ADULT RESPONSE PLAN
2:02:10 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of SB 36. [CSSSSB 36,
version C, was before the committee.]
He moved Amendment 1, labeled 28-LS0338\C.1.
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR COGHILL
TO: CSSSSB 36(JUD), Draft Version "C"
Page 2, following line 20:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"(c) Notwithstanding another provision of
law,
(1) a law enforcement agency, an
officer or employee of a law enforcement agency,
a person, or a group is not civilly liable for
(A) failing to participate in a
missing vulnerable adult prompt response and
notification plan;
(B) failing to implement a missing
vulnerable adult prompt response and notification
plan; or
(C) activating a missing
vulnerable adult prompt response and notification
plan if implementation is undertaken in good
faith;
(2) a radio or television broadcaster
or newspaper publisher is not civilly liable for
participating in a missing vulnerable adult
prompt response and notification plan or for
participating in the actual implementation of a
plan if the broadcaster or publisher has verified
the authenticity of that implementation with the
law enforcement agency."
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
SENATOR DYSON objected [for discussion purposes.]
CHAIR COGHILL asked Ms. Carpeneti to comment.
2:03:15 PM
ANNE CARPENETI, Assistant Attorney General, Legal Services
Section, Criminal Division, Department of Law, said that Susan
Cox indicated that this would provide better protection for law
enforcement than what is currently in the CS.
CHAIR COGHILL offered his understanding that the amendment
provides civil liability protection for those in law enforcement
and those who activate the vulnerable adult alert.
2:04:37 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI inquired if this was just for negligent
behavior or if it would exempt from liability someone who failed
to participate.
MS. CARPENETI said it doesn't specify so it would probably be
for all circumstances where a person did not participate.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI agreed with the intent on negligence, but
questioned the policy reason for extending the liability
exemption that far.
MS. CARPENETI agreed that it was a policy call for the
legislature.
CHAIR COGHILL offered his understanding that the civil liability
exemption previously extended to newspaper publishers and other
communications media. The amendment broadens the definition.
MS. CARPENETI deferred to the sponsor because this provision was
in the bill originally.
2:06:37 PM
NATHAN ZENSEY, Staff, Senator Johnny Ellis, explained that the
intent is to diminish the burden for law enforcement agencies.
The hope is that those agencies will act in accordance with the
public trust placed in them.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he can envision this becoming a
problem in years to come, but the expectation is that law
enforcement will do the right thing. He posed hypothetical
examples.
SENATOR DYSON asked the point at which conduct by law
enforcement crosses the line and the person becomes civilly or
criminally liable.
MS. CARPENETI deferred the question to someone working in the
Civil Division.
SENATOR DYSON said he was relatively comfortable that current
law and practice would cover the current concern.
MS. CARPENETI responded that her understanding was that this
immunity would apply under the circumstances of silver alert.
2:10:08 PM
SENATOR DYSON said he didn't think that anyone would reason that
the Silver Alert was any different than things like the Amber
Alert or Caylee's Law.
CHAIR COGHILL asked Mr. Zensey if the standard was the same as
other alert systems.
MR. ZENSEY replied that the standards differ from state to
state, but he thought that at some point, whatever governs
negligence in normal missing person searches would govern
negligence in missing vulnerable adults.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI agreed that it was a policy call.
2:12:43 PM
SENATOR DYSON removed his objection.
CHAIR COGHILL found no further objection and announced that
Amendment 1 was adopted. He summarized the contents of the bill
and asked if the sponsor had closing comments.
MR. ZENSEY thanked the committee.
2:13:50 PM
SENATOR DYSON moved to report CSSSSB 36, version C as amended,
from committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal note(s).
CHAIR COGHILL found no objection and announced that CSSSSB
36(JUD) moved from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0081A.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| Sectional.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| CSHB 83 -10 amend.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 CFR Costs.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Executive Orders.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHb 83 Law Fiscal.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Legis activity.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Mack US story.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHb 83 misuse of power.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Null Void.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 sectional.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |