Legislature(1999 - 2000)
02/18/1999 08:58 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 36
"An Act relating to state procurement of certain
computer-related contracts."
Mark Hodgins, staff for Senator Jerry Ward, testified for
the bill. He said it would affect all computers and
software purchased by the state in the future.
He said that when the bill was heard in the Senate State
Affairs Committee there were some questions about page 1
lines 11 and 12 regarding product brochures requested. The
Division of Legal Services determined that it would not
affect the bill.
Senator Loren Leman wanted to know if this would create an
implied demand to change the state's hardware or software.
He spoke of many stand-alone computers that were probably
functioning adequately for the needed tasks they performed
even though they were not Y2K compliant. Mr. Hodgins
responded that this bill would only affect items to be
delivered after passage of the bill. Anything already
owned by the state would not be affected.
Senator Gary Wilken questioned the necessity of the bill.
He felt that the state was already taking appropriate
measure to prevent the purchase of non-Y2K compliant
equipment. By the time the bill went into affect, the
deadline would be very close. Mark Hodgins said he had
contacted Vern Jones, Chief Procurement Officer in the
Department of Administration, who brought up the same
point. However, Mr. Jones said he had no problem with bill.
While seemed like duplication, by setting the requirement
into statute, the state would have some recourse in case
non-compliant equipment was ordered.
Tape: SFC - 99 #31, Side B 9:48 AM
Mark Hodgins pointed out that certain policy directions did
not always reach all departments as quickly as the
Legislature would like.
Co-Chair John Torgerson gave a scenario for consideration.
He said that the value of equipment not Y2K compatible
would sharply decline. Some departments might wish to
purchase some of this low-priced equipment to use for
applications where the compliance was not necessary. Would
this bill prohibit them from making those purchases, he
wondered.
Mark Hodgins responded that it would prevent them. But he
was not sure the state had ever gone back and bought
obsolete equipment. He figured departments would wish to
purchase equipment that could be used for multiple
applications.
Senator Dave Donley suggested a sunset date be added to the
bill so the law would not be on the books years after its
usefulness.
Co-Chair John Torgerson asked why isn't there wasn't an
immediate effective date because the matter was so serious.
Mark Hodgins noted that neither a sunset nor an effective
date was included in the bill. He felt these would be two
amendments that would be appropriate.
Senator Al Adams wanted to know the penalty for not
complying with this law. Mark Hodgins did not know the
specific penalties but said it would be a very specific
policy direction to departments.
Co-Chair John Torgerson asked if this would apply to state
funded public facilities such as libraries. Mark Hodgins
was not sure. Co-Chair John Torgerson said it was staff
from a library that told him they would like to purchase
older machines for patrons to use and they would not need
to be Y2K compliant.
Senator Loren Leman asked if it was the chair's intent to
move the bill from committee today. Co-Chair John
Torgerson said no. He wanted the committee to work on
inserting a sunset date.
Senator Loren Leman suggested on line 7 and 11, an
amendment to insert the words "new" and "each". This might
allow departments to purchase the cheaper, non-compliant
equipment for nonessential applications.
Co-Chair John Torgerson directed Senator Gary Wilken to
work on drafting a committee substitute to address the
issues discussed.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|