Legislature(2025 - 2026)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/18/2025 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB64 | |
| SB35 | |
| SB34 | |
| SB37 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 64 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 35 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 37 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 34-REPEAL 90 DAY SESSION LIMIT
4:23:58 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 34
"An Act relating to the duration of a regular session of the
legislature."
4:24:27 PM
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, District E, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, sponsor of SB 34. She noted that SB 34 repeals a
citizens initiative passed in 2006 and discussed the following
points regarding the 90 day session limit:
[Original punctuation provided.]
• Passed to limit legislative sessions to 90 days
to promote efficiency and cost savings.
• Intended to streamline the legislative process
and reduce extended sessions.
• Legislature has only met the 90-day limit three
times since its passage.
• Two of these instances were in the early years
after adoption.
• The third was during the COVID-19 pandemic
(2020)an exceptional circumstance.
• The Legislature has frequently extended sessions
beyond the 121-day constitutional limit.
• More extended and special sessions raise costs
rather than reducing them.
• Managing natural resources, budgeting, and major
policies demand thorough discussion and debate.
• As budget challenges grow with inflation and lack
of revenue, more discussion is needed for
balancing the budget
4:26:10 PM
SENATOR GIESSEL continued:
• In 2020, the Legislature met for 69 days due to
pandemic restrictions.
• However, in 2021, the Legislature was in session
for 217 days to compensate for lost time.
• Demonstrates that artificial time constraints do
not eliminate legislative needs.
• The public expects sessions to conclude within 90
days.
• The reality of extended sessions leads to public
frustration.
• The 90-day rule has created more confusion than
efficiency.
• Fails to ensure efficiency or cost savings as
originally intended.
• Forces unnecessary special sessions that increase
legislative workload.
• Complex governance requires flexibility, not
rigid time constraints.
4:28:09 PM
PAIGE BROWN, Staff, Senator Cathy Giessel, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, provided the sectional analysis for
SB 34:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Sectional Analysis
"An Act relating to the duration of a regular session
of the legislature."
Section 1. Repeals AS 24.05.150(b). This sections
repeals the statute requiring the legislature to
adjourn from a regular session within 90 consecutive
calendar days, including the day the legislature first
convenes in that regular session.
4:28:47 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI opened public testimony on SB 34.
4:29:03 PM
ED MARTIN, representing self, Kenai, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 34 and stated that the main flaw in SB 34 is
ignoring art. III, sec. 2, Constitution of the State of Alaska,
"all political power is inherent in the people. He said the
people voted for a 90-day session, and everything should be
accomplished in that time period, if the focus stayed on
legislative priorities like budgets, appointments, and judges,
not symbolic bills.
4:31:49 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI closed public testimony on SB 34.
4:32:29 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI held SB 34 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 35 Version A.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Sponsor Statement Ver. A.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Sectional Analysis Ver. A.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Uber Letter of Support 2.4.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Instacart Letter of Support 1.31.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Doordash Letter of Support 2.6.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 34, Version A.pdf |
SFIN 5/7/2025 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 34 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 34 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 5/7/2025 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 34 Supporting Document.pdf |
SFIN 5/7/2025 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 37 Version A 2.13.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 37 Sponsor Statement version A 2.13.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 37 Fiscal Note.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 37 Supporting Document 2.13.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 35.ltr oppose.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB34-LEG-SESS-03-18-2025.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 34 |
| SB 35 Fiscal Note.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 37 Sectional Analysis version A 2.18.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 37 AFP ltr of support.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 37 Ltr of concerns.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 37 |
| SB 35 Ltr of opposition 3.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Ltr of support and opposition.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| atr_support sb35.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB35 Delivery Network Co Support Letter SSTA 3.18.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |
| SB 35 Ltrs of support.pdf |
SSTA 3/18/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 35 |