Legislature(2025 - 2026)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)

01/28/2025 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ SJR 7 RES. TO MAINTAIN DENALI AS OFFICIAL NAME TELECONFERENCED
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
Heard & Held
*+ SB 31 ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY PROGRAM TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
**Streamed live on AKL.tv**
              SB  31-ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY PROGRAM                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
3:53:47 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR   KAWASAKI  reconvened   the  meeting   and  announced   the                                                              
consideration  of SB 31  SENATE BILL  NO. 31  "An Act relating  to                                                              
the  duties  of  the Department  of  Administration;  creating  an                                                              
address confidentiality  program; and  providing for  an effective                                                              
date."                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
3:54:04 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  JESSE  KIEHL,  District   B,  Alaska  State  Legislature,                                                              
Juneau,  Alaska, summarized  SB  31  as the  sponsor  of the  bill                                                              
explained SB 31  establishes an address protection  program within                                                              
the Department  of Administration. SB  31 was inspired by  a story                                                              
of  a   domestic  violence  survivor   who,  despite   taking  all                                                              
necessary  precautions, nearly  encountered her  abuser at  a post                                                              
office.  He stated  SB  31  aims to  help  survivors,  as well  as                                                              
public  safety  professionals,  by offering  a  confidential  mail                                                              
forwarding  service  through  a   state-issued  post  office  box.                                                              
Unlike  similar programs,  this bill  also  allows peace  officers                                                              
and  correctional officers  to participate  for  their safety.  He                                                              
said  the  program   ensures  privacy,  allowing   individuals  to                                                              
rebuild their lives without fear of being tracked.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
3:58:35 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  GRAY-JACKSON asked  if the  PO BOX service  would  have a                                                              
fee.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
3:58:52 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KIEHL  responded no. SB 31  is designed so  the department                                                              
cannot charge a  fee. The State of Alaska would  manage additional                                                              
mail through  a designated  post office box  for the  program. The                                                              
program   administrator   would    forward   the   mail   to   the                                                              
participant's  confidential address,  thereby  incurring no  extra                                                              
cost to the participant.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
3:59:37 PM                                                                                                                    
ELLA   ADKISON,  Staff,   Senator   Jesse   Kiehl,  Alaska   State                                                              
Legislature,  Juneau,  Alaska, presented  the  sectional  analysis                                                              
for SB 31.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
[Original punctuation provided.]                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                    SB 31: Address Protection                                                                                 
                                                                                                                              
                       Sectional Analysis                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
           Sec.1:Puts the program in the Department of                                                                        
           Administration.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
      Sec.2:Creates the program.                                                                                              
           (b) requires a Post Office Box as a substitute                                                                       
           mailing address for enrollees and instructs the                                                                      
           department to forward mail to participants.  It                                                                      
           charges the department with protecting                                                                               
           confidentiality and requires regulations to                                                                          
           govern enrollment and withdrawal.                                                                                    
          (c) describes eligible participants as people                                                                         
           sheltered by a protective order and their                                                                            
           parents, guardians, children, and household                                                                          
           members. It also admits peace officers and                                                                           
           correctional officers.                                                                                               
           (d) prevents registered sex offenders from                                                                           
           enrolling in the program.                                                                                            
          (e) requires state and municipal agencies to                                                                          
           accept the P.O. Box.                                                                                                 
           (f) describes the eligibility period.                                                                                
           (g) prevents the department from charging a fee.                                                                     
           (h) allows access to confidential addresses                                                                          
           subject to a search warrant.                                                                                         
           (i) establishes penalties for unlawfully                                                                             
           revealing a protected individual's address.                                                                          
           (j) defines certain terms.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
          Sec.3:Establishes a transition period for the                                                                       
           department to adopt regulations to implement the                                                                     
           program.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     Sec.4:Lets the department begin its regulation process                                                                   
           immediately.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
      Sec. 5:Sets an effective date of Jan. 1, 2026 for the                                                                   
             rest of the bill.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:00:53 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  KAWASAKI  announced  invited testimony  and  opened  public                                                              
testimony on SB 31.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
4:01:17 PM                                                                                                                    
RANDY   MCLELLAN,   President,    Alaska   Correctional   Officers                                                              
Association  (ACOA), Anchorage,  Alaska,  testified by  invitation                                                              
on  SB 31.  He stated  correctional  officers'  work in  dangerous                                                              
environments,  dealing  with  aggressive  offenders  convicted  of                                                              
serious crimes.  They are  the barrier  between offenders  and the                                                              
public, often  facing threats to  themselves, their  families, and                                                              
property.  He  stated  he  personally  experienced  this  after  a                                                              
prisoner  accessed his  personal  information  and threatened  his                                                              
family. SB 31  is crucial as correctional officers  are frequently                                                              
called  to testify  in court,  and their  personal information  is                                                              
often exposed during legal proceedings, putting them at risk.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:04:00 PM                                                                                                                    
KEELEY OLSON, Executive  Director, Standing Together  Against Rape                                                              
(STAR), Anchorage,  Alaska, testified  by invitation  on SB  31 as                                                              
follows:                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
[Original punctuation provided.]                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     Prior to working  at STAR, I was a Victim  Advocate with                                                                   
     a  Prosecuting  Attorney's Office  in  Washington  State                                                                   
     and  managed  a Domestic  Violence  Shelter  program  in                                                                   
     Montana.   Both  states   had  Address   Confidentiality                                                                   
     Programs,  which were  essential  tools  used by  Victim                                                                   
     Advocates  to  assist  someone  with  stalking  or  high                                                                   
     lethality    risk   to   be    safer.   Combined    with                                                                   
     comprehensive   safety   planning   and   an   emergency                                                                   
     relocation  plan, the  Address Confidentiality  Programs                                                                   
     helped  save lives and  helped survivors  cope with  the                                                                   
     constant fear of their address being compromised.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     Address  Confidentiality Programs  are  available in  at                                                                   
     least  forty  states.  The programs  I  have  experience                                                                   
     with  were accessible,  easy  to use,  and  inexpensive.                                                                   
     Out  of   curiosity,  I   contacted  Montana's   Program                                                                   
     Administrator  to ask about  their program. It  began in                                                                   
     2006 with an  initial startup cost of $50,000.  Over the                                                                   
     last 17 years,  the program cost Montana  around $22,000                                                                   
     a year to  operate, with 68 participants  enrolled. Main                                                                   
     costs  of the program  were  to pay a  small portion  of                                                                   
     the   Program   Administrator    and   her   assistant's                                                                   
     salaries.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     I  applaud   making  the   program  accessible   to  law                                                                   
     enforcement.   I  have   worked   with   those  in   law                                                                   
     enforcement who  have placed their homes in  a spouse or                                                                   
     family member's  name to protect  their addresses,  so I                                                                   
     can  appreciate the  need for  their  inclusion in  this                                                                   
     bill.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:08:34 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR BJORKMAN asked  how the estimate of 60 pieces  of mail per                                                              
year per enrollee in the program was determined.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:08:56 PM                                                                                                                    
BRAD EWING,  Director, Shared  Services of  Alaska, Department  of                                                              
Administration   (DOA),   Juneau,   Alaska,   answered   questions                                                              
regarding  SB  31. He  stated  the  DOA contacted  several  states                                                              
running similar  programs, and  based on  feedback, we  arrived at                                                              
the average amount of mail sent annually.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR BJORKMAN opined  60 felt high given what  the bill sponsor                                                              
described. He  asked if it is  for a range  23 program  manager to                                                              
oversee just one employee.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  EWING  replied the  program  is  unique  in the  Division  of                                                              
Shared  Services  of  Alaska.  The division  has  a  central  mail                                                              
program with  five carriers,  but this  is a separate  initiative.                                                              
He  stated that  based on  talks  with other  states, for  example                                                              
Arizona,  one  range  22 program  manager  and  an  administrative                                                              
assistant would be  the right setup for a program  of this size in                                                              
Alaska.  Normally,  our  supervisors  have more  than  one  direct                                                              
report.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  BJORKMAN  asked  how the  Division  might  implement  the                                                              
program efficiently  given the current  fiscal constraints  of the                                                              
state. He  said he's  open to funding  the necessary  positions to                                                              
support this essential  service but is curious  about the assigned                                                              
salary ranges  and the inclusion  of annual travel  to conferences                                                              
and other items in the fiscal note.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
4:11:45 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  KAWASAKI shared  some concerns  about the  fiscal note  and                                                              
knows the finance committee will take a close  look at it. He said                                                              
Arizona has  a population of about  7.5 million, roughly  10 times                                                              
the population of  Alaska and doubts Arizona spends  $4 million on                                                              
its program. He opined that the cost seems high.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:12:21 PM                                                                                                                    
MR.EWING replied  he would work with  the bill's sponsor  to be as                                                              
financially efficient as possible.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
4:13:02 PM                                                                                                                    
ED  MARTIN,  representing  self,  Kenai,  Alaska,  testified  with                                                              
concerns  on SB  31. He  stated SB  31 is  a good  bill and  could                                                              
really help people  but wondered the effectiveness  considered the                                                              
amount  of information  available  online.  He stated  anyone  can                                                              
google an address.  The program might not fully  protect people if                                                              
it cannot limit what is already public on search engines.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
4:15:10 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  KAWASAKI stated  he  has more  questions  about the  fiscal                                                              
note,  but  will hold  off  and  let the  finance  committee  work                                                              
through the fiscal note.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
4:15:24 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR KAWASAKI noted  that the Division of Elections  keeps a list                                                              
of  where people  live  to determine  their  voting districts.  It                                                              
also has mailing  addresses, which can differ from  physical ones.                                                              
He  stated  that while  it  releases data  regularly,  residential                                                              
addresses  are  not  released  when  a  box  to  keep  private  is                                                              
checked.  He commented  that the  effort to check  a keep  private                                                              
box  shouldn't  cost as  much  as  the fiscal  note  suggests.  He                                                              
opined  that managing  a  list like  this  through the  department                                                              
should have some cost, but it shouldn't be overly expensive.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:16:16 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  KIEHL stated  that  although  many states  place  address                                                              
confidentiality programs  within the division of  elections, after                                                              
working  with  the  executive  branch,  it  was  decided  Alaska's                                                              
program should be  in the Department of Administration  due to its                                                              
centralized  mail  system.  The Division  of  Elections  expressed                                                              
concerns about  managing the  program. He  stated that  where it's                                                              
housed  isn't as  important as  getting the  service to  Alaskans.                                                              
Election  officials  and  clerks  already  follow  confidentiality                                                              
rules  for voters  who  check the  privacy  box,  and those  rules                                                              
would still  apply for participants  using the protected  address.                                                              
Regarding online  privacy, he  said no  program can erase  someone                                                              
from the  internet.  He said SB  31 helps  those restarting  their                                                              
lives or  in public safety careers  by giving them a  safe address                                                              
to use in records, reducing their exposure online.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
4:19:38 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR KAWASAKI kept public testimony open for SB 31.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
4:20:22 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR KAWASAKI held SB 31 in committee.                                                                                         

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 31 Sponsor Statement.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SB 31 Sectional Analysis.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SB 31 Fiscal note DPS.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SB 31 Fiscal note DOA2.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SB 31 Fiscal note DOA.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SB 31 Fiscal note DPS2 (1).pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
CS SJR 7 N.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SJR 7
SJR 7 Sponsor Statement.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SJR 7
SB0031A.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SJR 7 fiscal note.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SJR 7
2025-01-27 ACOA Letter in Support of SB 31.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31
SB 31 LOS Address Confidentiality Program 1.25.pdf SSTA 1/28/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 31