Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/28/2022 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB31 | |
SB189 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 189 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 31-PROHIBITING BINDING CAUCUSES 1:34:13 PM CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 31 "An Act relating to binding votes by or for a legislator under the Legislative Ethics Act." [CSSB 31(STA) was before the committee. The bill was previously heard on 5/10/21, 2/2/22, 2/11/22, and 2/16/22. Public testimony was heard and closed on 2/2/22.] 1:34:42 PM CHAIR HOLLAND moved to adopt Amendment 1, work order 32- LS0303\B.1. 32-LS0303\B.1 Klein 2/18/22 AMENDMENT 1 OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR HOLLAND TO: CSSB 31(STA) Page 1, line 9: Delete "a bill, appointment, veto, or other measure" Insert "an appropriations bill or a matter governed by the uniform rules of the legislature" SENATOR SHOWER objected for discussion purposes. 1:34:58 PM CHAIR HOLLAND explained that Amendment 1 would narrow the scope from "any bill, appointment, veto, or other measure" to only apply to budget and procedural matters since those were the typical issues in a binding caucus agreement. 1:35:21 PM SENATOR KIEHL offered his view that Amendment 1 does just the opposite since the Uniform Rules govern every vote and motion. He asked for clarification on Amendment 1. CHAIR HOLLAND asked his staff to explain the Legislative Legal Services attorney's comments. 1:35:57 PM ED KING, Staff, Senator Roger Holland, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, stated that the request to Legislative Legal Services was to address only budget bills and procedural matters when drafting the language in Amendment 1. 1:36:22 PM SENATOR KIEHL said he was impressed by the breadth of the amendment. 1:36:48 PM SENATOR SHOWER stated that the binding caucus rule required members to vote for the budget and procedural items, typically housekeeping measures. He related that the intent of Amendment 1 was to limit the bill to budget and procedural votes. He said he did not intend for the bill to apply to anything other than the budget or procedural votes. 1:38:11 PM SENATOR HUGHES offered her view that the language "or a matter governed by the uniform rules of the legislature" was quite broad. She asked whether the legislative legal attorney understood it was related to the rulings of the presiding officer. She said she understood the sponsor indicated the bill related to votes on the budget and rulings of the presiding officer. She expressed concern that the language was broad. CHAIR HOLLAND stated that was not the intent of Amendment 1. 1:38:55 PM MR. KING pointed out that the bill says it is on a matter relating to the uniform rules. Thus, it was not just the execution of the rules but would apply to a waiver of the 55 rules, so Amendment 1 would encompass any procedural matter that comes to the floor for a vote. 1:39:25 PM SENATOR MYERS stated that Amendment 1 would delete "a bill, appointment, veto or other measure." He recalled that the veto overrides were held out as part of the binding caucus a few years ago, although it was before his legislative service so that he could be mistaken. SENATOR SHOWER responded that the original agreement was on the budget and procedural votes, but it expanded to other matters, including the veto override. He stated that was the genesis of this bill. 1:41:03 PM SENATOR MYERS said those remarks make him question Amendment 1. He suggested that it might be better to leave the language as "a bill, appointment, veto or other measure." He related his understanding that the language "or other measure" would include the procedural votes. SENATOR SHOWER asked to have his staff speak to whether the bill should be left as is or if adding Amendment 1 would accomplish the goal. 1:42:44 PM SCOTT OGAN, Staff, Senator Mike Shower, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, on behalf of the sponsor, stated that in his experience binding votes applied to procedural votes on the floor or related to the budget. He noted that when he served in the legislature, the caucus would listen to people's concerns and build consensus. He related his understanding that a few leaders recently dictated the caucus policy without considering member opinions. He deferred to the committee to decide whether Amendment 1 would accomplish the goal. 1:44:36 PM SENATOR HUGHES agreed that leadership viewpoints change, but no one should be coerced into voting. She said she preferred the original language because it might apply to other votes. 1:45:19 PM CHAIR HOLLAND stated the goal of Amendment 1 was to simplify the bill, but it did not seem to do so. He withdrew Amendment 1. 1:46:16 PM SENATOR SHOWER said he appreciated the discussion and the opportunity to put some things on the record. SENATOR SHOWER removed his objection. 1:47:09 PM SENATOR SHOWER moved to report SB 31, work order 32-LS0303\B, from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). CHAIR HOLLAND heard no objection, and CSSB 31(STA) was reported from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
SB 31 SJUD Amendment B.1.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
SB 189 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Highlights 2.14.22.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 1 (OPA).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 2 (Public Defender).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 3 (Corrections).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 4 (LAW).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 5 (Troopers).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 6 (Justice).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
SB 189 Fiscal Note 7 (Courts).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |