Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/28/2022 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB31 | |
| SB189 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 189 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 31-PROHIBITING BINDING CAUCUSES
1:34:13 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 31
"An Act relating to binding votes by or for a legislator under
the Legislative Ethics Act."
[CSSB 31(STA) was before the committee. The bill was previously
heard on 5/10/21, 2/2/22, 2/11/22, and 2/16/22. Public testimony
was heard and closed on 2/2/22.]
1:34:42 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND moved to adopt Amendment 1, work order 32-
LS0303\B.1.
32-LS0303\B.1
Klein
2/18/22
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR HOLLAND
TO: CSSB 31(STA)
Page 1, line 9:
Delete "a bill, appointment, veto, or other
measure"
Insert "an appropriations bill or a matter
governed by the uniform rules of the legislature"
SENATOR SHOWER objected for discussion purposes.
1:34:58 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND explained that Amendment 1 would narrow the scope
from "any bill, appointment, veto, or other measure" to only
apply to budget and procedural matters since those were the
typical issues in a binding caucus agreement.
1:35:21 PM
SENATOR KIEHL offered his view that Amendment 1 does just the
opposite since the Uniform Rules govern every vote and motion.
He asked for clarification on Amendment 1.
CHAIR HOLLAND asked his staff to explain the Legislative Legal
Services attorney's comments.
1:35:57 PM
ED KING, Staff, Senator Roger Holland, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, stated that the request to Legislative Legal
Services was to address only budget bills and procedural matters
when drafting the language in Amendment 1.
1:36:22 PM
SENATOR KIEHL said he was impressed by the breadth of the
amendment.
1:36:48 PM
SENATOR SHOWER stated that the binding caucus rule required
members to vote for the budget and procedural items, typically
housekeeping measures. He related that the intent of Amendment 1
was to limit the bill to budget and procedural votes. He said he
did not intend for the bill to apply to anything other than the
budget or procedural votes.
1:38:11 PM
SENATOR HUGHES offered her view that the language "or a matter
governed by the uniform rules of the legislature" was quite
broad. She asked whether the legislative legal attorney
understood it was related to the rulings of the presiding
officer. She said she understood the sponsor indicated the bill
related to votes on the budget and rulings of the presiding
officer. She expressed concern that the language was broad.
CHAIR HOLLAND stated that was not the intent of Amendment 1.
1:38:55 PM
MR. KING pointed out that the bill says it is on a matter
relating to the uniform rules. Thus, it was not just the
execution of the rules but would apply to a waiver of the 55
rules, so Amendment 1 would encompass any procedural matter that
comes to the floor for a vote.
1:39:25 PM
SENATOR MYERS stated that Amendment 1 would delete "a bill,
appointment, veto or other measure." He recalled that the veto
overrides were held out as part of the binding caucus a few
years ago, although it was before his legislative service so
that he could be mistaken.
SENATOR SHOWER responded that the original agreement was on the
budget and procedural votes, but it expanded to other matters,
including the veto override. He stated that was the genesis of
this bill.
1:41:03 PM
SENATOR MYERS said those remarks make him question Amendment 1.
He suggested that it might be better to leave the language as "a
bill, appointment, veto or other measure." He related his
understanding that the language "or other measure" would include
the procedural votes.
SENATOR SHOWER asked to have his staff speak to whether the bill
should be left as is or if adding Amendment 1 would accomplish
the goal.
1:42:44 PM
SCOTT OGAN, Staff, Senator Mike Shower, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, on behalf of the sponsor, stated
that in his experience binding votes applied to procedural votes
on the floor or related to the budget. He noted that when he
served in the legislature, the caucus would listen to people's
concerns and build consensus. He related his understanding that
a few leaders recently dictated the caucus policy without
considering member opinions. He deferred to the committee to
decide whether Amendment 1 would accomplish the goal.
1:44:36 PM
SENATOR HUGHES agreed that leadership viewpoints change, but no
one should be coerced into voting. She said she preferred the
original language because it might apply to other votes.
1:45:19 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND stated the goal of Amendment 1 was to simplify the
bill, but it did not seem to do so. He withdrew Amendment 1.
1:46:16 PM
SENATOR SHOWER said he appreciated the discussion and the
opportunity to put some things on the record.
SENATOR SHOWER removed his objection.
1:47:09 PM
SENATOR SHOWER moved to report SB 31, work order 32-LS0303\B,
from committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal note(s).
CHAIR HOLLAND heard no objection, and CSSB 31(STA) was reported
from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 31 SJUD Amendment B.1.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
| SB 189 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Highlights 2.14.22.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 1 (OPA).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 2 (Public Defender).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 3 (Corrections).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 4 (LAW).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 5 (Troopers).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 6 (Justice).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |
| SB 189 Fiscal Note 7 (Courts).pdf |
SJUD 2/28/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 189 |