Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
05/08/2024 09:00 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB29 | |
| SB34 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 99 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 228 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 95 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 29(FIN)
"An Act relating to civics education, civics
assessments, and secondary school graduation
requirements; and providing for an effective date."
9:07:55 AM
TIM LAMKIN, STAFF, SENATOR GARY STEVENS, introduced SB 29.
He relayed that Senator Stevens had been working on the
bill for many years. He explained that the bill represented
an effort to restore the younger generation's faith and
understanding of the government system. The bill called for
the creation of a civics curriculum and a required exam or
project-based civics assessment for graduating high school
seniors. He relayed that Senator Stevens often said that it
was a high-stakes issue but would not be a high-stakes
test. The goal of the bill was to foster citizenship,
voting, and community engagement, which was a fundamental
purpose of the public education system. He would provide a
brief introduction of the bill but he would be happy to go
through the bill in more detail if the committee wished.
Co-Chair Foster asked if the invited testifiers were
available.
Mr. Lamkin explained that Ms. Lisa Boudreau represented a
national picture of the civics education effort and was
available to testify. Also available was former UAS
[University of Alaska Southeast] Chancellor John Pugh. He
had asked both testifiers to be brief.
Co-Chair Foster noted that Chancellor Pugh was no longer
online.
9:10:05 AM
LISA BOUDREAU, DIRECTOR OF STATE POLICY, CIVICS NOW,
WASHINGTON DC (via teleconference), explained that Civics
Now was a national coalition focused on strengthening civic
education. She opined that Civics Now offered the most
promising bipartisan long-term plans with policy
recommendations, such as access to more professional
development for civics educators and proper assessment for
teachers, among several other recommendations. The most
important of the policy recommendations was to spend more
instructional time on civics in school. Civics education
had been neglected over the past 50 years. The Council of
Chief State School Officers estimated that 44 percent of
districts had cut back on instructional time for social
studies over the last 20 years. Studies showed a
significant drop in American knowledge of government and
basic rights and school test scores had also dropped;
however, she was encouraged that there was strong
bipartisan support for improvement. She shared that two-
thirds of all voters wanted more civics education in
schools.
Ms. Boudreau shared that state legislators had also noticed
that there was a problem and 21 measures across 23
different states had been passed in the last two years to
improve civics education. In the current legislative
session, there were 151 civics education bills in progress
across 33 states. She noted that 109 of the bills followed
Civics Now's policy recommendations. She explained that SB
29 reflected the national trends and would require students
to take a civics course in high school as a graduation
requirement paired with either a test or project-based
assessment. She urged the committee to support the bill.
9:12:46 AM
Co-Chair Foster OPENED public testimony.
Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony.
9:13:24 AM
Representative Hannan asked how many states had curriculum
directives as a statewide effort. For example, she wondered
if Alabama oversaw which math curriculums were offered in
the state. She relayed that Alaska had 54 school districts
and most of the decisions about curriculums were made by
the school districts. She clarified that she was looking
for a comparison between the number of states that had
directives at the state level versus at the district level.
Ms. Boudreau responded that currently, 37 states and
Washington D.C. mandated a civics course in high school and
curriculum choices were often made at the local level. Some
states were involved in helping develop a curriculum, but
usually teachers from the community and districts were
recruited to help write the curriculum.
Representative Hannan asked if the 37 states had detailed
course requirements or simply required a certain number of
civics credits to graduate. She asked if other academic
subjects were treated similarly.
Ms. Boudreau responded that her expertise was in the civics
field and she was unsure about other school subjects.
Mr. Lamkin added that there was a relevant document in
committee packets (copy on file) titled "What Other States
are Doing." He explained that Alaska's focus was solely on
civics education at present.
Representative Hannan asked how many states required
government or civics to graduate.
Mr. Lamkin responded that he was aware of only one district
with a specific civics requirement.
Representative Hannan asked if government courses were
considered civics education.
Mr. Lamkin argued that government courses could also focus
on history and not necessarily on projecting public
engagement with governance systems. The bill aimed to
encourage younger generations to become more engaged in the
system of government.
9:16:46 AM
Representative Josephson asked whether the national efforts
to increase civics education were similar to SB 29. He
wondered if national efforts also focused attention on
communist regimes that suppressed speech but not on right-
wing regimes that suppressed speech, like Russian President
Vladimir Putin's regime.
Ms. Boudreau responded that the bill sponsor included
language on comparative systems of government and addressed
the intent of language concerning communist regimes.
Representative Tomaszewski expressed that he was taken
aback by Representative Josephson's comments about the
right-wing Putin regime. He thought that there had been
recent groups of protestors destroying cities in the U.S.
who were wearing shirts depicting Fidel Castro. He
understood that the shirts were championing people like
Castro as good people. Such events showed him that civics
education was important because it was crucial to inform
young people about how people like Mao Zedong, Vladimir
Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Castro, and Pol Pot murdered over a
hundred million people in the last century and starved
their citizens to death.
9:19:00 AM
Representative Ortiz understood that graduating high school
seniors would need to pass a test or take a course if the
bill were to be adopted. He asked if he could be provided
with a copy of the test.
Mr. Lamkin responded that committee packets included a copy
of the U.S. immigration test (copy on file) that was given
to immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship. He relayed that the
civics test would be similar. The test had an 80 percent
pass rate amongst prospective immigrants, and he thought
the test was straightforward. He clarified that the
language of the bill would offer students a choice between
taking the written exam that he referenced or completing a
project-based assessment that demonstrated engagement in
local government.
Representative Ortiz shared that he was a social studies
teacher for 32 years and he could appreciate the value of
promoting civics understanding amongst young people. He
asked whether the course needed to include "civics" in the
title or if it could be titled "American Government." He
thought that government courses could address similar
topics and relayed that in Ketchikan, the high school
government course required that students attend local
school board meetings or city government meetings. He asked
if the course could have a different title and which entity
was responsible for determining which courses qualified as
civics courses.
Mr. Lamkin responded that he did not think that the senator
would object to the course being titled "American
Government" or something similar as long as the content of
the course fulfilled the civics criteria.
Representative Ortiz asked who would be the gatekeeper
determining whether the course fulfilled the requirements
of the bill.
Mr. Lamkin responded that the Department of Education and
Early Development (DEED) would develop the curriculum and
assessment and districts could use the information. There
would be a component on students' transcripts that would
indicate whether the course had been completed upon
graduation. He relayed that DEED would ultimately have the
responsibility to verify that the course had been passed
using the information on the transcripts.
9:23:22 AM
KELLY MANNING, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF INNOVATION AND
EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and EARLY
DEVELOPMENT, JUNEAU (via teleconference), reviewed the
fiscal impact note from DEED with the control code qxpAP.
The fiscal note detailed a one-time cost of $276,000;
$6,000 of which would simply cover the legal fees to update
the regulation. The department would convene an educator
working group and hire a facilitator to support the
department in developing the assessment and curriculum. The
department would also review the statewide social studies
standards and ensure that the standards were aligned with
all of the components in the bill. The upfront cost of the
bill would pay for the development of the course and making
the course available to districts.
Representative Josephson stated that he has been a history-
endorsed teacher since 1991 and took the teaching of
history seriously. He was concerned with subsection (b) at
the top of page 2 of the bill. He noted that the
educational focus of the course was on "admittedly bad"
left-wing regimes. He asked if he were teaching under the
requirements of the bill, would he be allowed to say that
Mao Zedong's predecessor, Chiang Kai-shek, was corrupt and
was backed by the United States government. He relayed that
Chiang Kai-shek was insensitive to poverty in his country
and a revolution began after World War II in response to
the situation. He asked if educators would be permitted to
provide some context as none of the regimes happened
organically. For example, the corrupt Batista regime
preceded Fidel Castro's rise to power. He argued that there
was a broader story to be told and asked if a teacher would
be allowed to tell the entire story.
Mr. Lamkin responded that the committee could spend a lot
of time discussing such topics. He did not think that
subsection (b) would preclude conversation or criticism of
any of the other comparative systems of government or
regimes. The subsection was added simply to ensure that the
specific topics would be covered in civics education
courses. The language of the bill intended to permit
discussion of all comparative systems of government used
around the world and would include all regimes and systems
of government.
9:27:29 AM
Representative Josephson remarked that he was originally
confused about the language of the subsection because it
did not seem consistent with Senator Stevens's principles,
but he realized that the bill was a committee substitute
from the House Education Committee and the language in
subsection (b) did not come from Senator Stevens.
Representative Hannan asked how many of Alaska's 54 school
districts already required students to take a government
course to graduate.
Ms. Manning responded that she would return to
Representative Hannan with the information. She was not
aware of DEED collecting such information, but the
districts collected the information.
Representative Stapp thought that subsection (b) was a
fantastic part of the bill and he did not think it went far
enough. He would strike the word "communist" and replace it
with the word "Marxist-socialist." All of the regimes
listed in the section originated from a Marxist-socialist
ideology. He thought it was important for students to
understand the weight of the ideology. He argued that the
ideology was "catastrophically devastating for the welfare
of humankind." He remarked that he was passionate about
learning history as well and thought that Representative
Josephson's comments about Chiang Kai-shek were unfair
given the context of World War II and China's history. He
thought it was important for kids to study history.
Representative Stapp continued and asked if the sponsor of
the bill would be amenable to adding a document called "The
Magyar Struggle" to the list of covered regimes in
subsection (b). He explained that the document was
published by Joseph Engels and Karl Marx in the Neue
Rheinische Zeitung, which was a newspaper that explicitly
linked Marxist-socialism to ethnic and social hierarchy. He
thought that kids should be educated about the impact of
Marxist-socialism.
9:31:22 AM
Representative Galvin remarked that it seemed like the bill
was focusing more on history education than on present-day
democracy and on educating students on ways to become an
engaged citizen. She asked how common it was to require
three hours of instruction on Mao Zedong, Vladimir Lenin,
Joseph Stalin, and other similar figureheads.
Ms. Boudreau responded that it was not a common requirement
in civics education legislation. She understood that the
House Education Committee added the mandate and it was not
part of the original bill.
Representative Galvin asked if there would still be enough
time in civics classes to cover other topics if an
additional three hours of instruction were included in the
curriculum.
Ms. Boudreau responded that she was unable to answer the
question and it would be better suited for DEED.
9:34:12 AM
Co-Chair Foster set an amendment deadline for SB 29 on
Thursday, May 9 at 5:00 p.m.
SB 29 was HEARD and HELD for further consideration.
9:34:31 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB099 Explanation of Changes 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB099 Letters of Support 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB099 Financial Literacy Presentation 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB099 Sectional Analysis 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB099 Sponsor Statement 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB099 Supporting Documents Junior Achievement 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB099 Supporting Documents Ramsey Solutions 2022 Study 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB228 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 228 |
| SB228 Supporting Documents-Sunset Audit.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 228 |
| SB 99 Public Testimony Rec'd by 5-7-2024.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |
| SB 228 Annetta Atwell Testimony 050824.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 228 |
| SB 99 Public Testimony Rec'd by 050924.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 9:00:00 AM |
SB 99 |