Legislature(1997 - 1998)
02/18/1998 01:35 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 28 - UNINCORP. COMMUNITY MATCHING GRANTS
CHAIRMAN MACKIE called the Senate Community & Regional Affairs
Committee meeting to order at 1:35 p.m., and noted the presence of
Senators Phillips, Hoffman, Donley and Mackie.
CHAIRMAN MACKIE announced SB 28 would be taken up as the first
order of business. He noted there was a draft committee substitute
which is substantially different than the original bill and is the
result of his working with Senator Torgerson on several issues.
SENATOR JOHN TORGERSON, prime sponsor of SB 28, speaking to the
committee substitute, said the thrust behind the bill was to let
unincorporated communities that are in organized boroughs also
participate in the unincorporated community matching grant program.
Currently, that grant money is only available if the community is
outside of a borough.
Senator Torgerson outlined the following revisions to the
Unincorporated Community Capital Project Matching Grant Program:
. The legislation provides that the unincorporated communities
in an organized area must come up with a 30 percent match in
money similar to the way boroughs do for their Capital
Matching Grant Program. This does not change the existing
unincorporated communities outside the boroughs from the
current required match of 5 percent;
. It changes the program so that a community must have a
project in order to be granted the money. Currently, a grant
is given regardless if there is a project on the books or not;
. It revises the fund distribution so projects can be based on
health and safety considerations subject to a ranking system
put together by the department. It is anticipated that the
ranking system would be something similar to the Department of
Environmental Conservation's ranking process for water
projects, as well as other ranking criteria that's used across
the board in other departments;
. It requires the governor to include projects in his capital
projects which would then come to the Legislature for final
appropriation; and
. It changes the lapse time of the program from five years to
four years. If a community has a project approved, it can
accumulate money for up to four years for a same project since
the maximum that be granted in one fiscal year is $25,000.
Senator Torgerson directed attention to backup information
containing a list of incorporated areas by Senate district, the
communities that are currently in the program by Senate district,
and the communities that would be added to the program. He noted
that it roughly doubles the number of entities that could be
eligible for this program.
Number 090
CHAIRMAN MACKIE asked Senator Torgerson what happens if the
projects that are submitted to the Legislature by the governor and
agencies are funded below the amount requested for the $25,000
grants to these communities. SENATOR TORGERSON responded that is
where they anticipate the ranking system would kick in and projects
would be ranked by the departments based on health and safety
considerations. He also noted that unincorporated areas inside of
boroughs must have borough assembly approval for projects and the
borough assemblies must recognize a nonprofit entity that's going
to represent that area.
Number 115
SENATOR HOFFMAN said the legislation seems to treat all of the
unincorporated communities much more fairly, but he expressed
concern that Section 2 changes the amount of the grant from a
minimum of $25,000 to a maximum of $25,000, so a community can
accumulate up to $100,000 over a four-year period, but in many
rural areas of the state it is conceivable that $100,000 wouldn't
even cover a forty by sixty building. SENATOR TORGERSON responded
that there are other processes to go through to receive grant
money, and this was never intended to be everything for an
unincorporated community to pick projects without having some
kind of fiscal restraint on it. He said this levels the playing
field, and by going to the maximum, probably more communities can
be squeezed in if they have smaller requests to begin with.
Number 180
SENATOR PHILLIPS directed attention to page 2, line 2 and the
phrase "social unit," which he thought should be defined in the
legislation. SENATOR TORGERSON replied that it was a good point,
and that he would check with the drafter to see if it should be
further defined.
Number 200
Responding to an inquiry by Chairman Mackie, SENATOR TORGERSON
explained that the original legislation included recognized
nonprofits within the state of Alaska, but it was taken out in a
sponsor substitute, and he has no intention of expanding the
legislation. He added that some entities aren't communities as
defined by unincorporated community and filed under the state as a
recognized unincorporated community, and that might be why "social
unit" was included in the legislation.
Number 256
KIM METCALFE-HELMAR, Special Assistant, Department of Community &
Regional Affairs, said the department had not had a chance to look
over the new committee substitute, but she thought the
establishment of a ranking system would change program
administration significantly.
There being no further testimony on SB 28, CHAIRMAN MACKIE
requested a motion to adopt the committee substitute and to move
the bill out of committee.
SENATOR PHILLIPS moved the adoption of CSSB 28(CRA) and to move
CSSB 28(CRA) out of committee with individual recommendations.
Hearing no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|