Legislature(2013 - 2014)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/27/2013 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB27 | |
| SB2 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 2 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 27 | ||
SENATE BILL NO. 27
"An Act establishing authority for the state to
evaluate and seek primacy for administering the
regulatory program for dredge and fill activities
allowed to individual states under federal law and
relating to the authority; and providing for an
effective date."
9:08:09 AM
LARRY HARTIG, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSERVATION, (DEC) introduced his support staff. He shared
that in crafting the legislation the department had
considered the most efficient use of time and personnel. He
stated that the department had led the charge at moving the
legislation forward. He noted that seeking primacy was a
significant endeavor. He recognized that the department
wanted to attract experts on regulatory programs which
would limit work with contractors or non-firms. He stressed
that an informed discussion with the federal government
concerning what should be delegated to states would be
necessary in meeting the intent of the legislation.
9:11:49 AM
ED FOGELS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES, relayed that in his extensive experience with
permitting activities for large projects he had noted the
importance of the relationship between the state and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). He said that wetlands
permitting had been important to every project. He believed
that state primacy would be beneficial and would give the
state more control over the permitting process. He
highlighted that there was not an economic activity in the
state that did not somehow rely on the wetlands permitting
process.
9:12:51 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough looked to Page 4, line 19 of SB 27:
notwithstanding any other provision of law, take all
actions necessary to receive federal authorization of
a state program for the department and the Department
of Natural Resources to administer and enforce a
dredge and fill permitting program allowed under 33
U.S.C. 1344 (sec. 404, Clean Water Act) and to
implement the program, if authorized
Vice-chair Fairclough wondered if the legislature would
have any recourse for not going forward regardless of the
cost of acquiring the program.
Commissioner Hartig replied that it was important going
forward that federal agencies understand that the intent of
the state was to gain primacy. He stressed that statutes
and regulations, as well as personnel, needed to be in
place before the state applied for primacy. He noted that
the program had to be comparable to federal law, which
meant that the department would need to have the positions
funded in the budget. He said that the request in the
current fiscal note would not be enough to fund the
positions; without the positions the state would not have a
complete application to submit to the federal government.
9:15:29 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough understood that there would be
approximately 50 new, full-time employees to implement the
federal program.
Commissioner Hartig responded that 49 was the number of
people in the regulatory program for the corps. He stated
that he did not believe that the number would increase. He
said they did not expect to get the full program from the
corps due to geographic limitations.
9:16:42 AM
Co-Chair Meyer believed that the state takeover of the
program would expedite the permitting process which had
been one of the biggest frustrations voiced by small
businesses in particular. He noted that the cost of
implementing the legislation would be significant. He
appreciated why the employees were necessary and why they
should be state employees rather than contract employees.
He expressed concern that unfunded liability could raise
with each new position. He asked if the first 5 needed to
be hired immediately, or if the state could hold off on any
of the positions until the next budget cycle.
Commissioner Hartig responded that the 5 positions would be
added to DEC this year, and the next 3 would be added in
two years in FY 15, making a total of 8 new positions I the
department.
9:20:09 AM
MICHELLE BONNET HALE, DIRECTOR, WATER QUALITY DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, spoke to the five
positions in FY 14. She said that one position was a fairly
high level management position because the department
needed someone who understood how to coordinate with EPA
and USACE and the different federal service agencies. She
relayed that there were additional two program development
positions and two capacity building positions. She
elaborated that the program development positions were
necessary to complete the list of tasks necessary to
develop the application that would be submitted to the EPA
for assumption of the program. She explained that the first
task would be to write a program description of how the
program would operate; one of the key components would be
determining which waters and wetlands were subject to USACE
oversight and which would be able to be assumed by the
state. She said that the state would have a lot of work to
figure out the cost and benefits of the program; describing
what the program would look like and how it would operate.
She stated that a contractor would work on a gap analysis
on statutes and regulations and would possibly write
regulations and draft statutes. She reiterated that the
amount of work would be significant and detail oriented.
She furthered that the capacity development track of the
legislation augmented the program development track. She
explained that statewide programmatic general permits were
permits that the USACE could issue, and the state could
cooperate with the corps on the issuance of the permits and
then take over management of the permits. She said that
the people in capacity development positions would work
with the corps to develop statewide programmatic general
permits which the state would implement and then run.
9:24:00 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough wondered about the work/share
agreement between the state and the USACE.
Ms. Hale replied that the work/share program was similar to
the relationship the state had with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). She said that it could involve a
state employee sitting at the corps in order to learn how
to run the program and identify efficiencies, and to assist
the corps with the permit backlog. She asserted that the
collaborative work/share between the corps and the state
would benefit the state in the end.
9:25:56 AM
Senator Olson queried the mining industry's perspective on
the program.
Mr. Fogels responded that his experience with smaller
mining operations revealed a great concern for the future
of the industry.
Senator Olson noted that there were a number of small
mining operations trying to make money in Nome in a short
period of time. He said that the increase in depressed
miners was bordering on a social issue in Nome. He wondered
who would be paying for the extra burden to social
services.
Mr. Fogels said that he had been working closely with the
mayor of Nome to identify solutions to the problems.
9:30:26 AM
Senator Olson said that the city was at the breaking point
of its public safety constraints.
Mr. Fogels said that there was in increased appropriation
in the governor's budget request that would extend the
length of the DNR position in Nome.
9:31:26 AM
Senator Olson opined that the streets in Nome were becoming
populated with vagrants due to the lack of mining activity
after the influx of miners.
Commissioner Hartig interjected that he could not speak to
the social issues in Nome, but he recognized the additional
activity in the area due to gold prices. He stated that
discussions had been held with the mayor of Nome, as well
as the city council, concerning how to maintain order. He
said that the representative from DNR currently in Nome had
experience with law enforcement, and because DNR was a
regulatory agency, was being granted some police authority.
Senator Olson expressed concern that having too many new
people in the community could tax the social and essential
services beyond the community's capabilities.
9:33:53 AM
Co-Chair Kelly expressed support for streamlining the
permitting process. He understood the one of DNR's missions
was to make it so businesses could operate in the state
without the "ridiculous hindrances" that were currently
seen throughout the permitting process. He encouraged the
committee to pass the bill out of committee with the
published fiscal notes.
9:34:51 AM
Co-Chair Kelly MOVED to REPORT SB 27 out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
SB 27 was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with previously published fiscal notes:
FN1 (DNR) and FN2 (ADM).
9:36:14 AM
AT EASE
9:38:26 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 2 - IMCC Annual Report 2011.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Dues Assessments 2014 and 2015.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Membership 2013.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Welcome.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support AMA.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support CAP.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support Mr. Steffy.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support RDC.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - List of Testifiers.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Sectional.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Testimony on AK SB 2 Senate Finance.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |