Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/24/2012 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB27 | |
| SB136 | |
| SB68 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 27 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 136 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 68 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 144 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 27(HSS)
"An Act relating to flame retardants and to the
manufacture, sale, and distribution of products
containing flame retardants; relating to a multistate
chemicals clearinghouse; and providing for an
effective date."
9:06:03 AM
SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, read from a sponsor statement
(copy on file) and introduced SB 27. He stated that the
bill would ban the use polybrominated fire retardants
(PBDEs) from being manufactured, distributed, or sold in
the state of Alaska; the negative health effects of these
chemicals had been well documented, and their impact on
children was disproportionately high.
Alaskans are particularly vulnerable for three
reasons: We spend a lot of time indoors with little
ventilation, increasing our exposure to and ingestion
of the microscopic particles of toxins found in
household dust that are released from our furniture
and electronics; we eat subsistence foods that may
concentrate toxins; and through a process known as
global distillation, toxins such as PBDEs are carried
in the atmosphere for great distances from points of
manufacture and concentrate in cold climates.
He addressed several concerns that were raised during the
last hearing on the bill by stating that the legislation
would not impact fire safety and would not exempt products
from meeting existing fire safety standards; there was not
a trade-off where the legislature would be forced to decide
between the "lesser of two evils". He noted that there had
been concerns that the bill increased costs to consumers,
but indicated that this was not true. He explained that
similar bans had been adopted in the European Union,
Illinois, and Washington and that affordability had not
been an issue in those states. He directed the committee's
attention to a letter from an Illinois Representative named
Elaine Nekritz (copy on file); it stated that the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency had conducted a
comprehensive study to determine if there were cost or
affordability issues associated with the state's ban on
PBDEs, but had determined that there were none.
Affordability issues did not exist because there were large
markets that had already exempted and banned PBDEs. He
stated that there were many companies that did not sell
PBDEs and gave an example that the prior summer Walmart had
adopted enhanced testing on products to insure that no
PBDEs were sold in their stores. He shared that he had not
heard anything from his constituents regarding increased
prices in consumer grids and anticipated that other
retailers would conform easily to the legislation. He
offered that the "simple truth" was that PBDEs were largely
being manufactured abroad; the legislation would protect
American jobs and the health of children from foreign
companies that sold products with toxic chemicals. He
concluded that the bill had widespread statewide support
from health officials and concerned citizens.
Co-Chair Stedman discussed a new zero fiscal note from the
Department of Health and Social Services, a new zero fiscal
note from the Department of Public Safety, and a new fiscal
impact note from the Department of Environmental
Conservation for $139,000 in general funds for a new full-
time environmental program specialist.
9:10:33 AM
Senator Ellis MOVED to report CSSB 27(HSS) out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
9:10:45 AM
CSSB 27(HSS) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with a new zero fiscal note from the
Department of Health and Social Services, a new zero fiscal
note from the Department of Public Safety, and a new fiscal
impact note from the Department of Environmental
Conservation.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Approved LegLog 1027 Response to SB144 Questions ( Sen Stedman).pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 144 |
| SB 68 2011 CFAB Annual Report.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 68 |
| SB 27 Opposition Burn Association.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 27 |
| SB 27 Opposition Letters.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 27 |
| SB 27 Opposition Letters 2.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 27 |
| SB 68 Amendment 1.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 68 |
| SB 27 (HSS) Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 27 |
| SB 144 Letter of Support - Covenant House of Alaska.pdf |
SFIN 2/24/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 144 |