Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/18/1999 09:02 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 24(JUD)
"An Act relating to regulations; relating to
administrative adjudications; amending Rule 65, Alaska
Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an
effective date."
Senator Dave Donley moved for adoption of the CS SB 24
Version "V". Senator Al Adams objected for question. He
felt bill should wait for similar bills. He noted SB 106,
addressed the Department of Health and Social Services as
one. He felt SB 24 should delete Department of Health and
Social Services provisions and be handled under SB 106.
After those comments, Senator Al Adams withdrew his
objection.
Senator Dave Donley said he thought the CS would address
Senator Al Adams's concerns. It narrowed the applicability
to just the Department of Natural Resources, Department of
Fish and Game and Department of Environmental Conservation.
Co-Chair John Torgerson detailed the changes in the CS.
Section 16, which set the time limits, was covered in SB
106.
Section 2 language was inserted, "except for designated
state agencies".
Subsection (b) addressed the cost and benefit requirement.
His intent was that if a fiscal note were passed with a
bill that was not substantial changed by the adoption of
the regulation the fiscal note would work as the cost
benefit analysis. The fiscal note would then be included in
the explanation in the public release of the regulation.
If the Legislature passed a law, it was therefore
determined through the process whether or not the benefits
were to the public's best interest. To then require the
Administration to do a cost benefit analysis on those
regulations would be duplication. The intent was to lessen
the amount of work required of the agencies
Section 9 was language dealing another section and would
probably be amended out.
On page 7 the remainder of the sentence regarding good
faith attempt on line 3 was removed. It could be hard to
defend in court what a good faith attempt was.
Section 16, the time limit section, might be the same that
Senator Robin Taylor was attempting with SB 106. Senator Al
Adams requested comments from the departments on this
section.
Section 17 was new and defined "designated agencies". This
CS would only apply to the Department of Environmental
Conservation, Department of Natural Resources and the
Division of Habitat and Restoration, Department of Fish and
Game. It did not include any functions controlled by a
board or commission and it did not include an
organizational entity whose members were confirmed by the
Legislature.
Senator Dave Donley liked the CS with the exception of
Section 8. He didn't feel it would give the public
appropriate notice of what the department intended to adopt
in regulations. He asked if the CS could be adopted without
that section. He said the original intent of the bill was
to give clear notice to the public of the actual regulation
the agencies were going to adopt. He felt the changes in
Section 8 went against that. He wanted to see the fiscal
notes reflecting the exclusion of Section 8.
Senator Dave Donley moved to amend CS SB 24 Version "V" to
delete Section 8 (Amendment #10). Without objection, it was
adopted.
CS SB 101 Version "V" as amended was adopted as a Workdraft
without objection.
Senator Randy Phillips asked if the number of fiscal notes
would be reduced. Co-Chair John Torgerson liked what the
sponsor was doing but needed to limit the amount of the
fiscal notes. That was why he narrowed the focus down three
programs.
The bill was held in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|