Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/11/2022 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB23 | |
| SB119 | |
| SB129 | |
| SB118 | |
| SB31 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 129 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 23-INITIATIVE SEVERABILITY
1:34:16 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 23
"An Act relating to proposing and enacting laws by initiative."
[SB 23 was previously heard on 4/19/2021 and 2/9/2022.]
1:34:36 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND opened public testimony on SB 23.
1:35:13 PM
KATI CAPPOZI, President; Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Alaska
Chamber, Anchorage, Alaska, stated that the Alaska Chamber
supports passage of SB 23. The Alaska Chamber was founded in
1953. Its mission is to promote a healthy business environment
in Alaska. The Alaska Chamber represents 700 members and
businesses of all sizes and sectors from across the state. Each
year the Alaska Chamber membership votes on its advocacy agenda.
Ballot measure reform was recently added as an issue of
statewide importance for the business community in Alaska.
MS. CAPPOZI stated that their position of support for ballot
measure reform says, in part, that "changes in the initiative
process should produce more transparency and better public
policy in a comprehensive and balanced manner equally benefiting
both voters and the legislative process."
1:36:08 PM
MS. CAPPOZI related that the Alaska Chamber focused on two
points. First, the Alaska Chamber wanted to ensure transparency
that will benefit Alaskans and ballot measure proponents, and
second, to uphold the constitutional rights and duty of the
legislature. Once Alaskans sign their names to specific ballot
measure language, their support should apply only to the exact
wording in the ballot initiative. If any court or courts decides
to alter or remove language for the initiative, no one can
assume that support remains for the revised language. Likewise,
if the court or courts sever language from a proposed ballot
measure, no one can assume that the ballot measure proponents
themselves will support the new language.
1:36:48 PM
MS. CAPPOZI stated that Alaska's current system threatens all
ballot measure proponents, regardless of the cause or political
affiliation. It restricts groups from an opportunity to go back
to the drawing board if a court or courts alter the language of
the measure they submitted initially. Second, the Alaska Chamber
wants to ensure that the constitutional obligations of the
legislature are upheld. Allowing courts to sever the language of
a proposed law and placing that proposed law on the ballot would
grant the judicial branch the power to write law, which is
expressly limited to the legislative branch or the people by way
of the ballot measure process. This strips the legislature of
its constitutional obligation to review initiatives and, if it
chooses, to enact a law that is considered substantially
similar. The Alaska Chamber supports the passage of SB 23 to
benefit the people of Alaska and ballot measure proponents by
increasing transparency and providing for a clear set of rules.
Further, it provides the express ability to write laws to the
legislature and Alaska's voters.
1:38:03 PM
REBECCA LOGAN, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Alaska Support
Industry Alliance, Anchorage, Alaska, spoke in support of SB 23.
She stated that the Alaska Support Industry Alliance (Alliance)
is a 43-year-old trade association representing 500 members and
support companies for oil, gas, and mining. The Alliance has
supported this legislation since the late Senator Birch first
introduced it as Senate Bill 80. The Alliance believes that the
provisions of an initiative should not be severable after being
circulated. The Alliance bases this on the desire to protect the
integrity of the ballot initiative process by ensuring that
voters know that the language on the ballot is precisely the
same as what was presented when they signed the ballot
initiative.
MS. LOGAN said the Alliance also supports prohibiting the court
and unelected judges to amend initiative language, thereby
crafting legislation from the bench. Finally, the Alliance would
like to ensure that ballot initiative language passes legal and
constitutional muster before it's presented to the voters. She
urged members to support this critical legislation.
1:39:40 PM
LAURA BONNER, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, spoke in
opposition to SB 23. She stated that she lives in Senator
Revak's district, the same district that the late Senator Birch
represented.
MS. BONNER said that the Alaska Constitution, art. XI, sec. 1
begins with "The people may propose and enact laws by
initiative...." She expressed concern that SB 23 would usurp
people's power in the initiative process. The gathering of
signatures demands substantial time, effort, and expense to
obtain the number of signatures required in all 40 House
districts. If SB 23 passes the legislature, the sponsors tasked
to gather enough signatures must start all over if one word or
sentence is changed, added, or deleted after a judicial review
or court decision.
1:40:33 PM
MS. BONNER stated that she had signed quite a few petitions over
the years. And some of those she signed only because she thought
it should be voted on by the people, or perhaps by the
legislature before the election. She related this was allowed in
Section 4 in the Legislative Legal letter dated April 23, 2019,
regarding Senate Bill 80, which is identical to SB 23.
MS. BONNER highlighted a paragraph at the end of that letter,
which read, "The Court has also described the people's
initiative power as an act of direct democracy guaranteed by our
constitution. However, under SB 80 a person proposing an
initiative would be prohibited from including a severability
provision." Because of this, it could be considered
unconstitutional. She said she believes that is true.
MS. BONNER said the voters' initiative constitutional rights
shouldn't be stifled, and passage of SB 23 would do just that.
She acknowledged that she is not an attorney, but she offered
her view that there may be constitutional issues regarding the
bill.
1:42:34 PM
SENATOR SHOWER welcomed her ideas on how to amend the bill. He
explained that the issue SB 23 addresses is when an initiative
is significantly changed after people initially signed the
petition. When that happens, voters no longer vote on the
initiative they supported.
1:43:14 PM
MS. BONNER responded that what counts is when voters cast their
vote once the initiative is placed on the ballot. She viewed it
as similar to the legislative process when legislators support
or co-sponsor a bill and the bill changes in the committee
process. Legislators can vote against it on the floor. The floor
vote counts just as a vote cast for a ballot proposition that
changed during the initiative process.
1:44:06 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND closed public testimony on SB 23.
1:44:12 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND held SB 23 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 23 Letter of Support - AGC.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Letter of Support - Alaska Chamber.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Letter of Support - RDC.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Letter of Support - CAP.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Letter of Support - Alliance.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| RDC SB 23 Comment letter 2-11-22.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB23 - Letter of Support - APF.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 119 SJUD Amendment G.2.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 119 |
| SB 129 SJUD Amendment O.5.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 129 |
| SB 129 SJUD Amendment O.6 as amended.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 129 |
| SB 23 Public Testimony through 2.12.22.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 118 SJUD Public Testimony.pdf |
SJUD 2/11/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 118 |