Legislature(2007 - 2008)BELTZ 211
03/13/2007 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB101 | |
| SB97 | |
| SB18 | |
| SB99 | |
| HB108 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 99 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 18 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 101 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 18-PROPERTY FORECLOSURES AND EXECUTIONS
CHAIR ELLIS announced SB 18 to be up for consideration.
SENATOR BUNDE, sponsor of SB 18, said that Alaska statutes on
real property and its non-judicial foreclosure process are
antiquated and sometimes ambiguous and are often prone to
litigation. SB 18 proposes to clarify the present statutory
language, simplify it and modernized it.
He said currently the process for such a foreclosure is to go to
the courthouse steps auction. Some people in the trade, known as
bottom feeders, will buy a mortgage for $1 more than is owed to
the bank with the idea of churning the property very quickly -
not caring for the property or using it as a home. This bill
would allow others who might actually wish to own the home and
establish a residence there to bid up the price on the property.
Passage of SB 18 would streamline and simplify the foreclosure
language and provide for a more open, accessible and fair
auction process that would benefit borrowers, lenders, title
insurers, individuals and even neighborhoods, as well as reduce
unnecessary litigation.
1:46:13 PM
STEPHAN ROUTH, Rough Crabtree, Anchorage, said he has practiced
law for 25 years focusing on real estate matters. This bill was
drafted to address issues he has seen over the years and with
the knowledge he has gained about practices in 11 other states
that are non-judicial foreclosure states like Alaska. The intent
was to incorporate best practices into Alaska law and modernize
it.
One change calls for a three-month time period between doing one
act and another and that was changed to 90 days to account for a
smaller number of days in February. The posting language was
clarified to cover situations where there is no structure by
stating you can take reasonable steps to post if you can't get
to a building. This was a "litigation-breeder."
Third, SB 18 modernizes the market for the foreclosure auction
by advertising foreclosures on the Internet. Now a foreclosure
auction takes place at the court house steps. However, because
it is done by judicial district, it requires advertising in a
newspaper and a courthouse in the district, but not necessarily
closest to the property. He emphasized that the newspaper piece
is not taken away, but reasoned that the foreclosure notice
section is probably the least-read part of any newspaper people
use the Internet all the time.
MR. ROUTH further explained that in his experience having two
bidders is better than one because he has found that the second
bidder is usually someone who wants to move into the property
and will also get the price up. You get two bidders by getting
information out where it can be seen. This bill gets it out on
the Internet and makes it lawful to accept an offer from
someplace other than the courthouse steps.
CHAIR ELLIS said this is the first hearing and he would have the
bill back before the committee in the near future.
1:52:12 PM
BRYAN BUTCHER, Director, Governmental Affairs and Public
Relations, Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), supported
SB 18, but said a few technical issues have come to his
attention in talking to the Attorney General's Office.
MR. BUTCHER said there were three issues. The first is on page 1
regarding the extra cost of advertising. According to the AG's
office the publishing of the notice of sale of foreclosure on an
Internet website would bring an additional cost that is unknown
at this time. It would be borne by the borrower or possibly the
lender if the property cannot be sold for the balance of the
loan and the cost of foreclosure. Also, there may only be one
Internet website currently that would meet the qualifications of
the proposed bill.
The second change is on page 2 - the right to cure a default
arisen by failure to make payments. Under current law, a default
on a loan that has arisen by failure to make payments may be
cured at any time before the sale. The new language shortens the
time period to cure by five days, which would reduce the
borrowers' time to cure.
The third point is a terminology change on page 6 to be
consistent with the beginning of the bill where the reference is
to "deed of trust or trustor of the deed of trust". In section 9
it changes to use of the term "grantor in the trust deed" or
"grantor". For consistency purposes the AG's office pointed out
these terms should be changed to reflect what is used in the
beginning portion of the bill.
He concluded saying the changes have more to do with the
consumer than the corporation and he also noted a zero fiscal
note from the corporation.
1:55:04 PM
BRYAN MERRELL, First American Title Insurance Co., said he
practiced law in Alaska, but was transferred by his company to
Seattle. He continues to oversee his company's underwriting and
claims for the State of Alaska and he still visits frequently.
He supported SB 18 saying he had been involved with Mr. Routh
since its inception. He explained that First American and other
title insurance companies are involved in foreclosure cases
because they are named as the original trustee under the deed of
trust and in many cases continue to perform that function
through the foreclosure process.
Second he said they issue a product called "the trustee sale
guarantee" which is a title report to the foreclosing trustee
and the lender beneficiary under the deed of trust that recites
what parties are to be provided - what notice is required and
what the status of title of the property is at the time of the
foreclosure process beginning.
MR. MERRELL concluded that he supported SB 18 because it
clarifies foreclosure problems that have arisen because some
Alaska Supreme Court rulings have made the current statute so
unclear that it is, in fact, a litigation breeding ground that
needs to be cleaned up.
1:57:33 PM
SENATOR BUNDE summed up that he would incorporate the concerns
in a CS for another hearing.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|