Legislature(2001 - 2002)
02/13/2001 09:04 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 16
"An Act regarding oil discharge prevention and cleanup
involving self-propelled nontank vessels exceeding 400 gross
registered tonnage and railroad tank cars and related
facilities and operations and requiring preparation and
implementation of oil discharge contingency plans for those
nontank vessels and railroad tank cars; amending the
definition of 'response action' that relates to releases or
threatened releases of oil and thereby amending the duties and
liabilities of response action contractors; and authorizing
compliance verification for nontank vessels and for trains and
related facilities and operations; and providing for an
effective date."
This was the third hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Kelly drew member's attention to the sponsor statement
from the Taskforce on Motorized Oil Transport that was prepared
since the previous hearing.
Co-Chair Donley expressed that his lack of further questions at
this time should not be mistaken for support of the fiscal notes.
He stated that while concerns were raised at the previous hearing
he had yet to find solutions.
Senator Ward offered a motion to move from Committee, SB 16 with
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities zero fiscal
noted, dated February 7, 2001, and $78,000 fiscal note from the
Department of Environmental Conservation dated February 9, 2001.
Co-Chair Donley requested the motion be severed to exclude fiscal
notes.
Senator Ward restated the motion as to apply to the bill only.
Without objection, SB 16 MOVED from Committee.
Co-Chair Donley moved for adoption of the aforementioned fiscal
notes. He spoke against the addition of four positions to state
government that these fiscal notes provide. He stressed that he
hoped future finance committees would reexamine the situation in
the event that the Department of Environmental Conservation
requests even more positions to perform the prescribed duties. He
opined that the department should be able to accomplish the duties
with existing staff. He qualified that the legislation itself is
important and suggested designating the added positions toward the
accomplishment of the goals of this legislation. At the same time,
he continued, the adoption of the fiscal note should not be
construed as an endorsement for an increased level of funding for
the department. He explained that if the budget subcommittee is
able to identify how this job could be done using existing staff,
adjustments should be made. He summarized that while the fiscal
note creates four additional positions, by the end of the
legislative session, there may not actually be four new employees
depending upon the merits of the existing positions.
Co-Chair Donley commented that the sponsor statement was well
prepared.
There was no objection and the fiscal notes MOVED from Committee
with the bill.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|