Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/01/1995 09:05 AM Senate HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SHES - 3/1/95
SB 15 EXTEND FOSTER CARE REVIEW PANEL
Number 160
CHAIRMAN GREEN introduced SB 15 as the next order of business
before the committee.
SENATOR ELLIS, prime sponsor, thanked the Chair for having the bill
before the committee. He stated that children in the custody of
the state deserve a high commitment. He recounted the history of
the issue of permanency planning, independent citizen dominated
foster care review. Independent citizen dominated foster care
review is a group of citizens and service providers working with
social workers to achieve the best for the child, placing the child
in a permanent placement as early as possible. He pointed out that
a child often endures abuse first, from an individual and then from
the system; the legislature has the power to change the abuse of
these children by the system.
Senator Ellis explained that SB 15 proposes to extend the
permanency planning effort in Alaska, although it would not be the
full-blown effort envisioned with the original legislation. He
noted that Representative Toohey has a similar bill. This
legislation is a bipartisan effort. He directed the committee
members to the state audit in their packets which justified the
extension.
CECILIA KLEINKAUF thanked the committee for the opportunity to
testify. She noted her involvement in the effort to establish
foster care review in Alaska. She explained that under the federal
Adoption Assistance and Health Welfare Act of 1980, children's
foster care is required to have a written case plan within a short
time period after a child is placed. The case plan must be
reviewed on a regularly scheduled basis, but states are given the
ability to decide whether to do those reviews internally or through
an external citizen review. Alaska chose to do internal reviews
until 1990. When concerns began to arise, the original legislation
Senator Ellis referred to was introduced.
Number 236
Ms. Kleinkauf stated that the original legislation established an
independent citizen foster care review board. Many other states
have established similar independent foster care review boards due
to the need to review the state agencies from an outside vantage.
She noted that research, particularly in Nebraska, has illustrated
that independent review is more successful in returning children
home or to a permanency plan. Due to the high case loads and
stress which social workers face, the federally mandated reviews
may fall to the wayside in order to deal with other issues.
Ms. Kleinkauf clarified that the independent review board's sole
function is to review child welfare cases in order to ascertain if
the state is providing reasonable effort to either prevent
placement or to reunite children when possible. The independent
review board also reviews the efforts for permanent plans for
placement of the child. She stated that she always supported
legislation in this area. The independent foster care review board
is a more beneficial approach to permanency placement than an
internal review approach. She urged the committee to pass SB 15
out of committee. She noted that independent review, in other
states, has demonstrated increased permanency for children and
decreased costs to the state.
Number 280
PAULENE HAFUND, volunteer panelist for foster care review,
appreciated the opportunity to testify. She informed the committee
that there are approximately 20 volunteers who have contributed
over 1,650 volunteer hours on this project in the last 15 months.
These children are our future and should be supported in the best
manner possible. She said that they were working with the Division
of Family and Youth Services (DFYS). She explained that as a
volunteer citizen, their input may be different than that from a
social worker. From December of 1993 to January of 1995, the panel
has reviewed the cases of 263 children of which 50 percent were
pre-school age. Furthermore, 142 of those children have been
reviewed more than once. She believed that this indicated that the
panel is having an impact. She urged the committee to endorse
SB 15.
CHAIRMAN GREEN inquired as to the will of the committee.
SENATOR ELLIS moved that SB 15 be moved out of committee with
individual recommendations.
SENATOR LEMAN objected. He noted the presence of a fiscal note and
the back up attached. He asked if it would be necessary to have
new staff for this panel or could it be integrated into the system.
SHARON BARTON, Department of Administration, stated that she
currently supervises the Citizens Foster Care Review program. The
fiscal note was essential when the legislation was written because
the funding had been zeroed out of the Governor's budget. She
pointed out that the Governor's amended budget, sent across
yesterday, restored the funding for the program. The fiscal note
would now be zero. If the bill passes, the funding would be
supported in the department's budget. She specified that this
would merely maintain the current level of staffing of the program.
SENATOR LEMAN asked how many children's cases were reviewed by the
three person panel. SHARON BARTON reiterated that in the last 14
months, they have reviewed 260 cases. The two social workers do
most of the organizational work for the panels such as preparing
the packets, setting up the logistics, reviewing and summarizing
the files.
Number 337
SENATOR LEMAN asked if Ms. Barton felt that such a workload for
three individuals was reasonable. SHARON BARTON expressed
confidence in stating that the state is receiving great work for
minimal resources. The social workers are Range 14 and work many
hours of overtime. Ms. Barton pointed out that the panel does not
have any clerical support, their furniture is surplus. Ms. Barton
indicated that they have contemplated the possibility of organizing
this staff in another configuration in order to cover more children
statewide. There may be a manner in which this money could be
spread to touch more children.
SENATOR LEMAN removed his objection.
CHAIRMAN GREEN noted that without other objection, SB 15 would be
moved out of committee with individual recommendations.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|