Legislature(2017 - 2018)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/15/2017 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB9 | |
| SB14 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 14 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 14
"An Act relating to transportation network companies
and transportation network company drivers."
9:08:09 AM
Co-Chair MacKinnon REOPENED public testimony.
9:08:45 AM
JAMES HARRIS, OWNER, JUNEAU TAXI, JUNEAU (via
teleconference), testified against the legislation. He
remarked that the legislation would reduce the wages, and
reduce the amount of money contributed to the state. He
remarked that there was a certain pool of customers in each
community. He remarked that his company was already not
busy, so adding several drivers to the pool in a small
customer base would reduce the wages across the board. He
shared that the drivers would then only make minimum wage.
He asserted that Uber drivers made minimum wage. He
wondered why there was a concern to bring a business into
the state that did not pay any money to the state and not
pay their employees. There would be a negative effect on
the cab industry, because there would not be as many
dispatchers. He stressed that the taxi companies were
required to have contracts; special insurance for the
vehicles; pay extra at the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
for commercial registration. He assumed that Uber drivers
would not have to purchase special insurance, because they
use their personal vehicle, resulting in more state revenue
lost. He noted that everyone would lose money, except for
Uber. He felt that the bill would only slow down the
industry, and limit the ability to not afford better
vehicles and provide better service. He shared that Uber
charged customers much more than what they would normally
pay during a busy time.
Co-Chair MacKinnon requested a closing comment.
Mr. Harris concluded his comments.
9:14:28 AM
SAM MOORE, SELF, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), spoke in
favor of SB 14. She wanted to have more opportunities for
mobility. She stated that she was legally blind, so she
used the public transportation. She felt that the bill
provided more mobility options for people to have an easier
access to transportation. She felt that a safe ride would
generate economic activity. She remarked that the bill was
not about taxis, rather was about more mobility options.
She felt that the bill would make for more vibrant,
livable, and walkable communities.
Co-Chair MacKinnon CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair MacKinnon stressed that the bill did not address
taxicabs. She explained that the legislation was a
transportation network bill. She stated that the drivers
were independent contractors: they would drive their own
vehicles; use their own phone; no scheduled shifts; and
would have no direct supervisor.
9:17:10 AM
AT EASE
9:17:26 AM
RECONVENED
9:17:29 AM
Co-Chair MacKinnon noted that Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development (DCCED), Department of
Law (LAW) would be available to answer questions about the
fiscal note.
SB 14 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 14 - Opposition Letter - Brennan.pdf |
SFIN 2/15/2017 9:00:00 AM |
SB 14 |
| SB 9 DMVA Follow-up 021317.pdf |
SFIN 2/15/2017 9:00:00 AM |
SB 9 |
| SB 14 - Testimony - AML.pdf |
SFIN 2/15/2017 9:00:00 AM |
SB 14 |