Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124
03/31/2017 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s) | |
| SB14 | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s) | |
| SB14 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 14 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
SB 14-TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES
3:25:32 PM
CHAIR KITO announced that the next order of business would be CS
FOR SENATE BILL NO. 14(FIN) am "An Act relating to
transportation network companies and transportation network
company drivers; and providing for an effective date."
3:26:15 PM
WESTON EILER, Staff, Senator Mia Costello, Alaska State
Legislature, presented CSSB 14 (FIN) am on behalf of Senator
Costello, prime sponsor. He stated that this is the "Let's Ride
Alaska Act." It would authorize transportation network
companies (TNCs), more commonly known as "rideshares," to
operate in the state of Alaska. The proposed legislation would
set the framework and safeguards that would enable TNCs, such as
Uber and Lyft, to provide transportation services. These
rideshares create a platform where Alaskans can "self-select
each other to get from here to there." These services provide
economic benefits and flexible employment for Alaskans and
benefit a broad demographic in underserviced areas. [TNCs] give
a connection when it's hard to get a cab, improve access to
services, and lower the number of occurrences of driving under
the influence (DUI). He indicated that the proposed legislation
would offer a statewide solution while allowing municipalities
to have a choice.
3:30:09 PM
MR. EILER spoke about the demand for services. For example: In
2014, Uber Technologies Inc. had over 100 drivers; over 2,000
Alaskans had the Uber Technologies Inc. application ("app") on
their phone, and 60,000 opened the app just to see if the app
was available. He related that 49 other states have rideshare
options; Alaska is the last state without this service. He
stated that this bill is necessary because it clarifies Alaska's
workers' compensation insurance statutes, which will allow these
companies to operate in Alaska. Previously when Uber
Technologies Inc. operated in Anchorage, it was involved in
talks with the Municipality of Anchorage and the State of
Alaska, which resulted in Uber Technologies Inc.'s pausing its
operations and signing a settlement. Part of that settlement
was that [TNCs] would seek legislation that would add TNC
drivers to the list of job classes and occupations in state
statutes that are exempt from workers' compensation. TNC
drivers are included in the same job class as taxi drivers. Mr.
Eiler stated, "That was part of the clarity in the resolution
that the company Uber Technologies Inc. reached with the
Department of Labor in 2014 and is one of the essential reasons
why there's a need for state legislation to help deal with
this."
MR. EILER noted that Washington State exempts TNC drivers from
workers' compensation. No jurisdiction considers TNC drivers as
employees. TNC drivers would fit under the independent
contractor concept. Drivers can work for a TNC on their own
time and using their own vehicles, phones, and skills. A driver
can work by turning an app on. To qualify to work for a TNC, a
driver needs to meet the automobile and driving record standards
for safety and accountability.
SB 14-TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES
3:40:02 PM
CHAIR KITO announced the final order of business would be a
return to CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 14(FIN) am "An Act relating to
transportation network companies and transportation network
company drivers; and providing for an effective date."
3:40:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH stated that he is "a fan" [of rideshare
services]. Regarding the idea of a limited passenger base, he
asked if it was known if communities [using TNCs] have
discovered an increase in customers because of the "ease of use"
[of apps] and if there are any other jurisdictions that have
documented results.
3:41:11 PM
MR. EILER clarified that TNCs do grow a customer base by making
it easier for a passenger to get to his\her destination. TNCs
make fares more affordable for passengers than regulated fairs
for the public provided thru car services or taxies. Rideshare
services are also creating more forms of transportation. TNC
services are accessed thru apps on a smartphone using a credit
card. He stated that using a TNC app on a cell phone can allow
a passenger to self-select the driver they want to use to take
them to their destination. He stated that there had been
studies that show TNC companies have been in operation for close
to a decade and have not seen a significant demise or decline in
the taxi industry. Mr. Eiler related that a study done by the
Portland Bureau of Transportation showed the impact of
initiating the operation of rideshare companies. That study
showed there was an initial, short-term dip in the number of
cabs hailed; however, over the past six-month period of the
pilot, the study showed that for-hire transportation use grew by
up to 40 percent.
3:44:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON requested Mr. Eiler please describe how
the system complements what cities are doing.
MR. EILER responded communities are in the process of looking at
how they regulate for-hire taxi or car transportation services.
The intention of the sponsor is to improve community
transportation. The Anchorage municipal assembly is phasing in
its medallion permits. Other communities have Commercial
Passenger Vehicles (CPV). The intent is to make it easier to
get a ride and increase transportation in communities where
there is clearly a demand.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked Mr. Eiler if CSSB 14(FIN) am is
sufficiently regulatory.
MR. EILER answered that 44 states regulate rides on a statewide
level. The concerns mentioned regarding regulation, public
safety insurance, and recourse are handled in the proposed bill:
Rideshares would be required to follow all traffic and public
safety laws; and drivers must hold both drivers and business
licenses, which provide recourse if there are any issues that
might arise. These rideshares have a large amount of feedback
and self-correction by their customers and drivers. These
companies continually evaluate and review the rankings that both
drivers and riders receive. For example, if a bad driver is not
meeting the standards, being unfriendly, arriving late, or
acting in an aggressive manner, then driver and passenger
receive instantaneous feedback by the TNC companies. Mr. Eiler
said the prime sponsor is comfortable with the structure and the
set-up that's provided and believes that it provides for the
necessary safeguards to have rideshares come to Alaska.
3:47:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON questioned if independent contractors
in Seattle are treating these folks as employees and weather
California is still debating this.
MR. EILER stated no statewide jurisdictions consider rideshare
drivers to be employees. The State of Oregon, on a regulatory
level, had determined that rideshare drivers are not employees
and were thus exempt from workers' compensation. The State of
Washington removes rideshare drivers from the state's workers'
compensation program. As a result, rideshare services fit under
the independent contractor's model, exempting them from workers
compensation along with taxi cab drivers and other comparable
professions.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON stated that many states do not describe
these types of drivers as independent contractors but leave that
question open for a court of law to determine.
MR. EILER answered he would provide comparative information from
the rideshare companies and that the information is accessible
on-line. He also stated that several states are silent about
how they define or frame the concept of an independent
contractor in their statutes. States like Arkansas have a 5-
prong variety of test they put in statute. No state considers
TNC drivers to be employees.
3:49:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SULLIVAN-LEONARD stated that she supports the
bill and thinks of it more like an economic overview. She said
she encourages new development in the state and wants to
continue to encourage new businesses to come to Alaska and
invest. She asked how many jobs Lyft and other TNC companies
will bring to the state. She asked Mr. Eiler to start with
numbers for the city of Anchorage, Alaska.
MR. EILER said he would be happy to provide data showing the
benefits that these companies and this type of technology have
offered across the country. What's seen is that Lyft, Inc.,
estimates that it adds $750 million to the economies around the
country. The company has seen and sighted an increase in
spending of 49 percent. Surveys have shown that 60 percent of
respondents either agree or strongly agree that Lyft provides
access to more areas. The bill sponsor's staff have spoken to
stakeholders that say this type of job fits their lifestyle very
well for the types of citizens that are in Alaska. For example,
being a rideshare driver is one of the few side jobs that the
active duty military can take, because it is flexible. Specific
figures for Uber Technologies Inc. are unavailable, since the
company had only been in Alaska for just a few months in 2014.
At that time, Uber Technologies Inc. had over 100 drivers. Mr.
Eiler stated that if these new technologies and opportunities
are allowed, and the choice and competition can come into
Alaska, then the prime sponsor thinks that this can transform
and catapult Alaska's economy in ways that can't even be
enumerated.
3:53:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SULLIVAN-LEONARD requested to see the numbers.
Regarding her constituency in the Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su)
Valley, she related there are a lot of families that work part-
time jobs because that's what is available in that area; being
able to work for a rideshare service would be highly desirable.
3:53:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP stated that while he thinks TNCs are an
upcoming technology, he does not like the proposed legislation.
He said he is an advocate for local control. He related that in
the Kenai Peninsula Borough, people must register as independent
contractors and have business licenses to collect sales tax. He
said he is not certain SB 14 would regulate independent
contractors; it would regulate TNC companies providing the
applications. He warned that in its eagerness to "get this
thing coming," the committee is "not thinking this thing
through." He said Alaska is probably the last state trying to
adopt [legislation regulating TNCs]; other states have gone
through changes in regulations and have adopted more
regulations. He questioned what the outcome of such legislation
would be.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP noted that there is a zero fiscal note
accompanying CSSB 14(FIN) am but predicted that the Division of
Licensing would "get bombarded with applications for business
licenses." He said he would be more comfortable if the proposed
legislation were to offer the basics regarding insurance
requirements and driver and vehicle inspections, while local
jurisdictions could take care of "the issues that will
eventually arise." He indicated that the committee had received
numerous letters of objection from local governing bodies that
do not want to have "that option." Regarding independent
contractor licensing and registration, he asked, "Will this bill
really extend to those drivers?"
3:58:12 PM
MR. EILER expressed that Senator Costello's intention was not to
increase burdens. Conversely, he said she sees CSSB 14(FIN) am
as a "great positive" that will "grow the number of people
registering for business licenses in the state." He offered to
follow up with Representative Knopp's staff to clarify insurance
coverage or any other questions regarding the bill. Other
states have a variety of ways to define and outline the concept
of working as an independent contractor (IC). When the company
Uber Technologies Inc. operated in the state of Alaska in 2014,
the first page of the settlement it signed with the Department
of Labor and Workforce Development said that it would not resume
operations or seek to continue activities unless state law
specifically exempted TNC drivers from workers' compensation.
Insurance is the purview of the State of Alaska. The
legislature sets the statutes on that, and there can be the
additional requirements on taxi drivers or others. He
emphasized that under CSSB 14(FIN) am transportation companies
would be responsible for "insurance that exceeds ... any local
jurisdiction in the state of Alaska." He mentioned statute
related to independent contractors and consideration by the
administration for the further definition in statute.
4:02:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP stated that he would like to see TNCs in
Alaska. He reiterated that independent contractors are exempt
from workers' compensation insurance and must have a business
license. He suggested removal of "local control language."
4:04:11 PM
CHAIR KITO interjected that Representative Knopp was referring
to a committee substitute that had not yet been adopted.
4:04:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL moved to adopt the proposed House committee
substitute (HCS) for CSSB 14(FIN) am, labeled 30-LS0250\L,
Wallace, 3/31/17, as a working document.
4:05:09 PM
CHAIR KITO objected for discussion purposes.
4:05:30 PM
LAURA STIDOLPH, Staff, Representative Adam Wool, Alaska State
Legislature, stated that version L would incorporate changes
that the companion bill [HB 132] made in the House, as well as
incorporate some amendments that had been made by the Senate.
It would involve a more prescriptive, seven-year lookback at
crimes that would disqualify a person from being a driver for a
TNC. There would also be a three-year lookback at their moving
violations which may also disqualify a person.
MS. STIDOLPH said the first change was on page 8, line 24,
adding AS [23.10.699] and AS 23.30.395 to clarify a more
independent contractor language in statute. Language on page 9,
lines 27-31, through page 10, lines 1-21 were removed and the
following language was added:
(b) A transportation network company may not allow a
driver to accept trip requests through its digital
network if the driver
(1) has, in the past three years,
(A) been convicted of or forfeited bail for
a third or subsequent moving traffic violation;
(B) been convicted of
(i) driving while license canceled,
suspended, revoked, or in violation of a limitation
under AS 28.15.291;
(ii) failure to stop at the direction
of a peace officer under AS 28.35.182;
(iii) reckless or negligent driving
under AS 28.35.400 or 28.35.410; or
(iv) a law or ordinance of another
jurisdiction having similar elements to an offense
listed in (i) - (iii) of this subparagraph;
(2) has, in the past seven years, been convicted
of
(A) any offense that is an unclassified,
class A, or class B felony in this or another
jurisdiction; or
(B) a misdemeanor involving
(i) a crime under AS 28.33.030, AS
28.35.030, or 14 28.35.032;
(ii) a crime under AS 28.35.050 or
28.35.060;
(iii) a crime against a person under AS
11.41; or
(iv) a law or ordinance of another
jurisdiction having similar elements to an offense
listed in (i) - (iii) of this subparagraph;
(3) is listed on the United States Department of
Justice National Sex Offender Public Website; or
(4) is under 21 years of age.
(c) A transportation network company driver may not
(1) provide a prearranged ride unless the
transportation network company rider has been matched
to the driver through the digital network of the
transportation network company;
(2) solicit a ride or accept a street hail
request for a ride; or
(3) solicit or accept cash payments for a fare
from a rider.
4:12:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked, "What are the changes between
'E' and 'L'?"
MS. STIDOLPH answered, "'E' and 'L' were the two ... statutes
that clarified 'independent contractor' language in Alaska
statute."
4:12:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked for confirmation that [Version L] had
been reviewed with TNCs.
MS. STIDOLPH answered, "Yes, it has been reviewed by the TNC."
4:12:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP cited language on page 8, line 23, which
states that a TNC "is not an employer of Transportation Network
Company drivers", and noted language beginning on line 24 states
that a TNC driver "is an independent contractor for all
purposes". He said he doesn't believe the proposed legislation
applies to TNC drivers as independent contractors; he thinks it
refers to the company and not the driver.
4:14:42 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 04:14 p.m. to 04:19 p.m.
4:19:54 PM
CHAIR KITO removed his objection to the motion to adopt the
proposed HCS for CSSB 14(FIN) am, labeled 30-LS0250\L, Wallace,
3/31/17, as a working document. There being no further
objection, Version L was before the committee as a working
document.
4:20:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 30-
LS0250\I.A.1, Wallace, 3/28/17, which read as follows:
Page 10, line 30, following "Records.":
Insert "(a)"
Page 11, following line 6:
Insert new material to read:
"(b) Except for specific information about a
transportation network company rider, including the
rider's name, address, and telephone number, a
transportation network company shall provide a
transportation network driver information for each
ride the driver completes, including global
positioning data, the fare and tip paid by the rider,
and the rate charged.
Sec. 28.23.130. Prohibitions. A transportation
network company may not
(1) take adverse action against a
transportation network company driver, including
restricting the driver's tips or suspending or
terminating the driver's participation in the
company's digital network, as a result of the driver
(A) organizing or joining a driver
association or labor organization or participating in
a driver association or labor organization or the
activities of the driver association or labor
organization;
(B) decreasing the driver's participation
in the company's digital network; or
(C) generating less fare or tip income;
(2) change a compensation rate or other
material term of a contract with a driver without the
driver's voluntary prior consent, if the contract is
based on the driver providing a ride to a
transportation network company rider."
4:20:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL objected.
4:20:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON spoke to Amendment 1. He said the
proposed amendment would show drivers how a rate was derived.
He said he's heard that TNCs routinely change rates, which, to
him, means the drivers are not independent contractors, because
"generally you wouldn't impose such a thing on an independent
contractor and get away with it." He indicated that a TNC
company cannot do anything to prohibit the efforts of TNC
drivers to "organize."
4:21:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said, "Some of this is just the terms of
service between a business and independent contractor; so, I
don't feel the need to ... legislate it."
4:22:58 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:22 p.m. to 4:23 p.m.
4:23:21 PM
CHAIR KITO clarified that Amendment 1 was written to a prior
committee substitute and, if adopted, would be conformed to
Amendment 1 by Legislative Legal and Research Services.
4:23:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL surmised that the place for Amendment 1 in
Version L would be in "the records section" on page 11, line 8.
He noted that a previous testifier had said [TNCs] frequently
were changing the rates and changing what the driver was
earning. He recollected he had spoken with someone associated
with Uber Technologies Inc., who said rates are decreased, but
infrequently. He mentioned surge pricing, which gives
incentives to drivers not currently on the network during rush
hour or times when there is a high demand and low supply. He
offered his understanding that this is a regular practice. He
said that other than surge pricing, he didn't think fare
changing was common.
4:26:46 PM
MITCHELL MATTHEWS, Uber Technologies Inc., stated that Uber
Technologies Inc. has dynamic pricing at times when there is
high demand and limited supply. In terms of more general
changes to fare structures, he said Uber Technologies Inc. would
issue an agreement to the driver to which the driver would have
to agree. He said rates in Seattle, Washington, have not been
cut since he joined the organization and rates have been raised
in other markets. He said rates can go both ways, up or down.
Regarding Amendment 1, Mr. Matthews mentioned information
related to global positioning data and anonymity for privacy
purposes, and he opined that the proposed amendment is
ambiguous.
4:28:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON offered his understanding that Mr.
Matthews had stated that the TNC would make the driver aware of
changing fares and that the driver must agree to the changes.
Based on that, he said he doesn't understand how a driver could
be considered an independent contractor.
MR. MATTHEWS explained that in Seattle it's not just the TNCs
that can set fares by the minute, mile, or base fare; for-hire
companies within Seattle are able to set their fares by the
minute, the mile, and associated time value. He continued:
So, that information is what would be adjusted. We
wouldn't change the fare that a driver would be given;
the far is based off that base calculation of time,
space, and distance. ... That would be a change to a
market, based off of pricing. And so, the driver
doesn't have to necessarily agree with that, but
that's the pricing in the market, and we would issue a
service fee addendum on there, and they would be able
to drive on another TNC that may have different
pricing within the market. So, if Lyft or another TNC
came to Alaska, there [are] other apps out there that
they would be able to use if they didn't agree with
the fares that were set that make up that minute,
mile, and base fare on the Uber platform specifically.
4:30:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH states that he doesn't see [Amendment 1] as
helpful; therefore, he does not support it.
4:30:34 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representative Josephson voted in
favor of Amendment 1. Representatives Sullivan-Leonard, Wool,
Birch, Knopp, and Kito voted against it. Therefore, Amendment 1
failed by a vote of 1-5.
4:31:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON stated that he's disappointed that the
legislature couldn't craft a TNC bill where "everyone wins." He
said that he is frustrated because he thinks that "local
governments deserve to regulate this as they are each unique."
He noted that TNCs don't pass the Internal Revenue Service's
(IRS') test regarding who does the hiring, supervision, and
paying. He pointed out that there is a continuing relationship
between workers and employers. He mentioned the "number 12
test" of the IRS - payment by the hour, week, or month - and
said, "This points to an employer/employee relationship,
provided that this method of payment is not just a convenient
way of paying a lump sum agreed on as the cost of the job." He
said independent contractors are paid by the job or on straight
commission, but what makes this a quasi-independent contractor
situation is that the TNC is buying insurance from an
independent contractor, which he opined is "nice but "odd." He
said there is also a situation in which there is fluctuating
pay. He remarked that if he, as a lawyer, agrees to take on a
job for $50 an hour and halfway thru the job the client says
he/she will pay $35 an hour, then he, the lawyer, could sue that
client and win. He said, "And I don't get that. I mean, that
suggests they're employees. They also don't get the money in
the first instance; they get it in the second instance. That
doesn't suggest that they're independent contractors."
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said his concern is not with the
passengers but with the app not being on despite [the driver]
still being in "an employment stage, because they're about to
shift it on and they're driving across town to get to where the
action is for future rides." He said everything in the law
tells him that "these are common carriers or at least contract
carriers; they're not just individuals driving around; they're
taking people's lives in their hands." He said he think most of
the time things will work out, but sometimes it will not.
4:34:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON referenced a Washington Post article
from June 27, 2016, and other online publications. He expressed
concern that after paying their expenses Detroit drivers will
make $8.10 an hour, Houston drivers will make $9.93 an hour, and
Denver drivers will make $12.17; the Detroit drivers won't even
make minimum wage. He questioned whether this is the best
lifestyle for TNC drivers. He said he is worried that the
drivers may forgo other work and make this their primary way to
earn income. He reiterated that he is disappointed that there
hasn't been something better developed with the drivers in mind.
He said TNC companies violated the law by coming to Alaska
before they were regulated. He expressed concern that in Paris,
TNC drivers were asking passengers to help pay for the cost of
damages done by rioters.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON noted that the Municipality of
Anchorage supported Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft. He
continued:
So, it's ultimately coming down on the side of the
TNCs, but not without real regulation. And we're
saying, "All of that work goes away; we don't need to
know about that work."
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said although it may sound like he
knows how he will vote, he has not yet made that determination.
by a vote of 8-3; therefore, it's coming down on the side of the
TNC, but not without regulation." He reiterated his
disappointment that a better plan could not be made, and he
expressed concern about the chaos that could result without
local control.
4:38:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH spoke in support of Version L and the TNC
initiative, in general. He said overregulation stifles economic
development and opportunity. and he opined that the action of
Anchorage to open up the community to ridesharing is a good
indication of "the success this has had." He said the proposed
legislation is "a good effort" and he looks forward to moving it
out of committee.
4:39:21 PM
CHAIR KITO commented that a lot of work has gone into the
proposed legislation and, while perfection may not be achieved
the first time around, the committee needs to start thinking
about how it will help a new industry come to Alaska, because it
is "a new paradigm in our state" whose "time has come."
4:40:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said he understands the concerns that have
been expressed related to labor issues, independent contractors,
workers' compensation, and local municipalities. He said many
of the concerns were addressed in Version L, including the age
of the driver. He said he understands concerns about safety of
drivers and of people on the road, in general. He indicated
that people may go out more and be safer [when using TNCs]. He
emphasized that he is not "taking a slam at cabs by any
stretch." He said he doesn't think local governments "have been
all that great to cabs either." He mentioned the decisions
being made about "medallions" and ventured that the municipality
probably would rather not deal with that issue. He said he
knows that Alaska is not a densely populated state, but there
are some communities that border each other, and he does not
think TNCs are going to come to each municipality separately to
negotiate a deal about insurance, for example. He said in Las
Vegas, Nevada, there is a taxi line outside establishments, and
now there is also an Uber/Lyft line, which means that the idea
is being embraced. He said he thinks any bugs will be worked
out, and he said he thinks Alaska needs [TNCs].
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL, regarding concerns about minimum wage or
how much a driver makes, said a cab driver leases a cab, buys
gas, and drives, but has no guarantee of making money. He said
that is the reality of certain types of businesses. Regarding
Representative Josephson's scenario in which the payer drops the
rate, Representative Wool said, "Well, in the middle of a ride,
I don't think your rate's going to go down either." He noted
that Mr. Mitchell had said the rates in Seattle had not gone
down in years. He talked about businesses adapting, and he
said, "We can make changes and adaptations, as needed."
4:44:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL gave the example of Netflix which used to
mail digital video disk [DVDs] to clients homes, but now the
majority of its business is streaming video. He opined, "Cabs
have apps; it's the future, and we can sit around and watch it
go by, or we can get onboard, and we can make changes and
adaptations."
4:44:48 PM
CHAIR KITO recognized former House Labor and Commerce Standing
Committee Chair, Representative Kurt Olson, was in the committee
room.
4:45:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL moved to report HCS CSSB 14(FIN) am, Version
30-LS0250\L, out of committee with individual recommendations
and the accompanying zero fiscal note. There being no
objection, HCS CSSB 14(L&C) was reported out of the House Labor
and Commerce Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB014 Amendment 1 3.30.17.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
SB 14 |
| SB014 HCS Version E 3.31.17.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
SB 14 |
| HCS CS SB014 version L.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
SB 14 |
| HCS CS SB014 Sectional Analysis version L.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
SB 14 |
| SB014-HB132 Supporting Documents - Letters of Support 4.3.17.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
HB 132 SB 14 |
| SB014-HB132 Supporting Documents Index 4.3.17.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
HB 132 SB 14 |
| SB014-HB132 Supporting Documents - Letters of Opposition 4.3.17.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
HB 132 SB 14 |
| HCS CS SB14 Explanation of Changes ver Y.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2017 3:15:00 PM |
SB 14 |