Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
05/17/2021 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB204 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 12 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 204 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 58 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE LABOR AND COMMERCE STANDING COMMITTEE
May 17, 2021
4:01 p.m.
DRAFT
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Zack Fields, Co-Chair
Representative Ivy Spohnholz, Co-Chair
Representative Calvin Schrage
Representative Liz Snyder
Representative David Nelson
Representative James Kaufman
Representative Ken McCarty
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 204
"An Act relating to the presumption of compensability for a
disability resulting from certain cancers in firefighters."
- MOVED CSHB 204(L&C) OUT OF COMMITTEE
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 204
SHORT TITLE: WORKERS' COMP DISABILITY FOR FIREFIGHTERS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) KAUFMAN
05/05/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
05/05/21 (H) L&C
05/14/21 (H) L&C AT 8:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
05/14/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/14/21 (H) MINUTE(L&C)
05/17/21 (H) L&C AT 3:15 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
CHARLES COLLINS, Director
Division of Workers' Compensation
Department of Labor & Workforce Development(DLWD)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
204.
JUSTIN MACK
Alaska Professional Firefighters Association
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
204.
LORI WING-HEIER, Director
Division of Insurance
Department of Labor & Workforce Development (DLWD)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
204.
ALLISON LEIGH
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 204.
ACTION NARRATIVE
4:01:00 PM
CO-CHAIR IVY SPOHNHOLZ called the House Labor and Commerce
Standing Committee meeting to order at 4:01 p.m.
Representatives McCarty, Kaufman, Schrage, Nelson, Fields, and
Spohnholz were present at the call to order. Representative
Snyder arrived as the meeting was in progress.
HB 204-WORKERS' COMP DISABILITY FOR FIREFIGHTERS
4:01:41 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ announced that the first order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 204, "An Act relating to the presumption
of compensability for a disability resulting from certain
cancers in firefighters."
4:02:16 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ moved to adopt Amendment 1 to HB 204, labeled
32-LS0908\A.2, Marx, 5/13/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, following line 23:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 2. AS 23.30.121(f) is amended to read:
(f) In this section, "firefighter" means
(A) a person employed by a state or
municipal fire department or who is a member of a
volunteer fire department registered with the state
fire marshal; or
(B) a person registered for purposes of
workers' compensation with the state fire marshal as a
member of a volunteer fire department [HAS THE MEANING
GIVEN IN AS 09.65.295]."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
Page 2, line 26:
Delete "AS 23.30.121(b), as amended by this Act,
applies"
Insert "AS 23.30.121(b) and (f), as amended by
this Act, apply"
4:02:20 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS objected for the purpose of discussion.
4:02:21 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ explained that the purpose of Amendment 1 is
to define "firefighter" and to include volunteer firefighters
under the proposed bill. She shared that it is her
understanding that the majority of firefighters in Alaska are
volunteers, and she would like to ensure that workers'
compensation covers volunteer firefighters.
4:02:57 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS withdrew his objection.
4:02:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN objected for the purpose of discussion.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ asked if he would like to comment on his
objection.
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN explained that he objected because it
appears that "this is already covered" in other statutes. He
suggested that the invited testifier in the room speak on the
amendment.
4:03:41 PM
CHARLES COLLINS, Director, Division of Workers' Compensation,
Department of Labor & Workforce Development (DLWD), explained
that AS 09.65.295 is the statute that the division looks to on
this matter. He said that the division's opinion is that this
statute already covers volunteer firefighters. He noted that
there have been a number of cases where volunteer firefighters
have been covered and there has been no legal pushback.
4:04:19 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:04 p.m. to 4:05 p.m.
4:05:20 PM
JUSTIN MACK, Alaska Professional Firefighters Association,
addressed Amendment 1 and explained that currently, the
definition of "firefighter" [in statute] does include volunteer
organizations that are registered with the fire marshal's
office. One of the concerns in the past has been to ensure that
firefighters employed by state are covered, and he said that
there may have been a discrepancy in whether these firefighters
were covered. He explained that this would include airport
firefighters that are not necessarily employed by a municipality
nor considered to be volunteers. He shared his understanding
that firefighters that are registered with the state are
included [in statute]. He identified that a problem that some
volunteer firefighters experience is that these individuals
sometimes fail to meet other qualifications for coverage, such
as medical language and exposure language.
4:06:47 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked Mr. Collins if volunteer firefighters have
been included as a result of case law, regulations, or existing
statutes.
4:07:07 PM
MR. COLLINS responded that all he can state at this point is
that the division has never had a case where an individual was
excluded from workers' compensation due to the definition of
firefighter. Typically, volunteers do not meet the criteria of
the required medical evaluations, he said.
4:07:50 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS noted that Mr. Collins' answer is consistent
with his understanding that this is a matter of historic
practice, but that the amendment would add some clarity.
4:08:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN quoted language from AS 09.65.295(c),
which read as follows:
In this section, "firefighter" means a person employed
by a municipal fire department or who is a member of a
volunteer fire department registered with the state
fire marshal, or a person registered for purposes of
workers' compensation with the state fire marshal as a
member of a volunteer fire department."
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN shared his understanding that the statute
covers the intent of the amendment.
4:08:36 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ explained that the Amendment 1 has a second
intent, which is to ensure that firefighters employed at
airports and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) wildland
firefighters are included. She asked Mr. Collins to address
this topic.
4:08:55 PM
MR. COLLINS responded that he doesn't have any information on
that. He said that the division has not experienced
difficulties and has no position either way.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ expressed that it doesn't seem like updating
the language would cause any problems for the department. She
asked Mr. Mack to address the issue of firefighters that may not
be specifically referenced in the statutory definition of
firefighter.
4:09:42 PM
MR. MACK responded that firefighters are certainly asked to put
themselves at risk, particularly regarding exposure [to harmful
materials]. He said that he doesn't know if every potential
scenario has been litigated, but if the intent of the
legislature is to cover municipal, state, and volunteer
organizations, then the addition of the language in the
amendment would be appropriate.
4:10:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN withdrew his objection to the motion to
adopt Amendment 1.
4:10:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY objected. He shared his understanding
that the question at hand is whether the statute is sufficient
or whether language needs to be added [for clarity]. He said
that the language already in statute seems sufficient to him and
questioned why the language could not be left as is.
4:11:40 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:11 p.m. to 4:12 p.m.
4:12:48 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ referenced a legal memorandum ("memo") from
Marie Marx from Legislative Legal Services [included in the
committee packet], which refers to AS 09.65.295(c) and read as
follows [original punctuation provided]:
The statute's plain language makes it clear that
"firefighter" doesn't include firefighters employed by
the state. It includes only firefighters employed by a
municipal fire department and certain volunteer
firefighters.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ explained that the intention of Amendment 1,
which came about as a result of guidance from Legislative legal
Services, is to be "crystal clear" that all firefighters in
Alaska are covered.
4:14:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked if the word "state" would be
appropriate to add to the statute.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ restated that the language in Amendment 1 is
before the committee as proposed by Marie Marx from Legislative
Legal Services in order to be as clear as possible.
4:14:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY maintained his objection.
4:14:58 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Spohnholz, Fields,
Nelson, Schrage, Snyder, and Kaufman voted in favor of Amendment
1 to HB 204. Representative McCarty voted against it.
Therefore, Amendment 1 was adopted by a vote of 6-1.
[An Amendment 2 was in the committee packet but never offered.]
4:15:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY moved to adopt Amendment 3 to HB 204,
labeled 32-LS0908\A.5, Marx, 5/16/21, which read as follows:
Page 1, line 2, following "firefighters":
Insert "; and relating to a duty to document a
firefighter's exposure to a carcinogen"
Page 2, line 18:
Delete "and"
Insert "[AND]"
Page 2, line 23:
Delete "."
Insert "; and
(D) maintains a record of each exposure to
a known carcinogen, as defined by the International
Agency for Research on Cancer or the National
Toxicology Program.
* Sec. 2. AS 23.30.243 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(c) An employer shall maintain a record of a
firefighter's exposure to a known carcinogen, as
defined by the International Agency for Research on
Cancer or the National Toxicology Program, that
occurred while the firefighter was working as a
firefighter for the employer."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
Page 2, line 26:
Delete "AS 23.30.121(b), as amended by this Act,"
Insert "This Act"
4:15:53 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ objected for the purpose of discussion.
4:15:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY explained that Amendment 3 intends to
address who is recording the encounters firefighters may have
with carcinogenic materials. He explained that he contacted
fire departments in Los Angeles, California, New York, New York,
and Seattle, Washington, and shared that in these fire
departments, the firefighter and the captain both record the
instance of a fire and whether there were carcinogenic materials
present. He shared that Amendment 3 says that the
responsibility to record this information would be the duty of
the individual firefighter as well as the department.
4:17:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN opined that centralized reporting is
beneficial and it would better ensure that there is a record of
these encounters with potential carcinogenic materials.
However, he said, this could result in an unfunded mandate being
placed on volunteer fire departments that may not have the
resources to record information about possible encounters with
carcinogenic materials, which could mean that the record-keeping
responsibility could fall on the individual firefighter. He
said that this could burden volunteer fire departments. This
being said, he continued that having a backup of these records
is important. He asked where the data would go, how it would be
retained, and how it would be verified. He expressed that there
is a challenge in ensuring that this information is accurate,
"durable," and easily retrievable and verifiable. He asked how
this could be done without being burdensome.
4:19:53 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked Ms. Wing-Heier and Mr. Collins if they
could share their thoughts on whether this is an effective
structure for recording potential encounters with carcinogenic
materials.
4:20:30 PM
MR. COLLINS responded that from the division's point of view, it
is a big burden for volunteer firefighters to record instances
of potential encounters with carcinogenic materials. He shared
his opinion that Amendment 3 might narrow the presumption
because firefighters could be required to produce this record,
which could be burdensome. However, he shared that in
Anchorage, Alaska, there was a hearing [on an incident of
exposure] and there was a considerable amount of time spent on
research, incident reports, and legal proceedings to discover
what the cause of the cancer was in a firefighter, and he shared
that for larger departments, [the proposed changes in Amendment
3] could result in cost savings.
4:21:53 PM
LORI WING-HEIER, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of
Labor & Workforce Development (DLWD), responded that there is
something "very good" about Amendment 3, and she said that to
meet the presumption, there has to be a record. However, she
shared that when there are fire departments that are having
cookie sales and bake sales to raise money, and there would be a
cost. She said that she doesn't know what the cost would be,
and therefore doesn't know how there could be a decision made
about the cost. She concluded that keeping a record is a good
idea.
4:22:37 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS noted that he wants to ensure that this wouldn't
exclude someone from benefits if a volunteer firefighter or
department failed to keep a record. He said that he wants to
ensure that this wouldn't give an insurer a means by which to
deny payment due to the lack of a record, particularly if it was
an employer's and not an employee's failure to keep the record.
4:23:10 PM
MS. WING-HEIER responded that she would hope that insurance
companies wouldn't make the argument for denial of coverage that
a fire department was meant to keep a record and failed to do
so. She expressed that she doesn't think that the failure of a
department would negate an employee's claim.
4:23:43 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ asked Mr. Mack to comment on Amendment 3.
MR. MACK responded there are currently three qualifying aspects
in statute for presumption, which are a qualifying medical exam,
seven years of employment, and demonstrated exposure to a known
carcinogen. He said that it seems to him that needing to show
that there has been an exposure is already a requirement. He
explained that there is a national fire incident reporting
system through the U.S. Fire Administration. He shared that his
concern is that Amendment 3 seems to go the "opposite direction"
when it comes to presenting a presumptive claim. He said that
an additional requirement of keeping a record of each exposure
would be difficult to define and could be defined in different
ways by different departments and individuals. He noted that
reporting and ensuring that departments have good reporting
standings is important, but said that he is not sure this
amendment is the place to input that language.
4:26:32 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked Mr. Mack if every fire is a presumed
exposure. He said that his understanding of the amendment is
that every fire is an exposure.
4:27:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER opined that the language in Amendment 3 is
fairly vague. She stated her concern is that this could be
setting individuals up for being denied coverage if the cancer
that has been contracted is not linked to a carcinogen in the
individual's list of exposures. She said that it is possible
that firefighters are being exposed to a variety of materials
that are not documentable. She asked if there is a reason to
not include "suspected carcinogens" in statute as defined by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
4:29:06 PM
MR. MACK responded with an example of recent study where
military style dog tags made of silicone that mimicked skin were
placed on firefighters in the field. These dog tags provided
information on the materials that are being absorbed by
firefighters' skin. He shared that "they found the things they
thought they were going to find" in addition to several other
carcinogens that were not necessarily expected to be present.
He shared that manufacturing processes are constantly changing,
and therefore there is always going to be an increased amount of
exposures. He explained that there are enough known carcinogens
in a vehicle fire, a building fire, a multi-family structure
fire, and so on, to qualify for an increased cancer risk [for
firefighters exposed to these carcinogens]. There are exposures
to carcinogens in the fire service also from personal protection
equipment (PPE) that is designed to protect firefighters, and he
said that the exposure is "nearly all the time," which speaks to
why presumptive cancer language in state statute is necessary.
4:31:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN directed attention to language on page 2,
Section 1, paragraph (3), subparagraph (C) of HB 204, which read
as follows:
(C) with regard to diseases described in (1)(C) of
this subsection, demonstrates that, while in the
course of employment as a firefighter, the firefighter
was exposed to a known carcinogen, as defined by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer or the
National Toxicology Program, and the carcinogen is
associated with a disabling cancer.
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN shared his understanding that it seems
like there is a sufficient definition for exposure.
4:32:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY said that he agrees with Representative
Kaufman. He said that there is nothing that mentions recording
exposures to carcinogens. He explained that recording of each
potential instance of exposure is not only done by large fire
departments, and noted that the chief of the fire department in
Chugiak, Alaska, said that firefighters are using applications
("apps") for recordkeeping. He opined that this isn't a new
burden; it brings the statutes up to date. He said that
Amendment 3 would make it easier to substantiate experiences and
make the claim process easier.
4:33:37 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ maintained her objection. She shared her
understanding that Amendment 3 would do the opposite of what the
bill intends to do, which is to create a presumption of
exposure, and would likely also create an unfunded mandate for
volunteer fire departments. She said that she is reluctant to
support something at the state level that could create
additional costs at the local level.
4:34:44 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS said he would vote for Amendment 3. He said
that he hopes that the legislature can work with Mr. Mack, Ms.
Wing-Heier, and Mr. Collins to come up with appropriate language
regarding an employer's responsibility to record exposures so
that an error in recordkeeping does not exclude an employee from
coverage.
4:35:23 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ commented that she appreciates the sentiment
of wanting to construct this language, but that she worries that
this could potentially create another barrier to workers'
compensation for firefighters that are being exposed to
carcinogens. She said that if insufficient records could
obstruct firefighters from receiving coverage, that would
concern her.
4:36:06 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives McCarty and Fields
voted in favor of Amendment 3 to HB 204. Representatives
Schrage, Nelson, Kaufman, Snyder, and Spohnholz voted against
it. Therefore, Amendment 3 failed to be adopted by a vote of 2-
5.
4:37:11 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
4:37:23 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ opened public testimony on HB 204.
4:37:34 PM
ALLISON LEIGH stated that she opposes HB 204 because the
information given to the committee is incorrect. She opined
that while Mr. Collins continues to inform the legislature that
workers' compensation has gone down, he has failed to inform the
legislature of all of the unnecessary and ongoing litigation
going on. She asked how this bill can come with a zero fiscal
note when Mr. Collins has repeatedly testified how expensive a
cancer claim is. She shared her understanding that
Representative Fields knows that workers' compensation does not
follow the Alaska State Constitution. She opined that the
Workers' Compensation Board uses injured workers' records to
coerce them into settlement because injured workers are left
with "literally nothing." She asked if Mr. Mack was or is on
the Workers' Compensation Board. She shared a personal anecdote
about her own experience in trying to receive workers'
compensation after a fall and said that she has been unable to
get a hearing. She opined that Mr. Collins has supplied
incorrect numbers to the committee and changes his
recommendations during meetings to benefit the Workers'
Compensation Board. She expressed that the workers'
compensation system is broken and that this bill doesn't
properly address the issues.
4:40:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN asked Ms. Leigh to contact his office so
that he could learn more.
4:40:45 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ, after ascertaining that there was no one
else who wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 204.
4:40:55 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS moved to report HB 204 out of committee, as
amended, with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 204(L&C) was
reported out of the House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
4:41:56 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Labor and Commerce Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at
4:42 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 204 DOLWD Response to Questions, 5.12.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| Amendment #1 to HB 204.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| Amendment #2 to HB 204.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Supporting Document - Firefighter Presumption PTSD Law Table June 2019 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Supporting Document - Renal Cell Carcinoma PFAS 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Supporting Document - IAFF Women and Cancer Study 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Supporting Document - PFAS and effects on the ovary 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Supporting Document - The University of Maryland Occupational Health Project 6.25.1999.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 v. A 5.13.21.PDF |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Fiscal Note - DOLWD-WC 5.7.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 PFAS European Journal Study 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Sponsor PowerPoint 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Sponsor Statement 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Letter of Opposition - AMLJIA 5.13.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/14/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - Guttmacher Alaska Statistics 2016 3.30.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - Guttmacher Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies February 2015 3.30.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - UCSF Study Newspaper Article 2.11.2011.pdf |
HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - Unintended Pregnancies Study March 2011 3.30.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Additional Document - Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives 4.1.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Additional Document - HRSA Women’s Preventive Services Guidelines.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Written Testimony as of 4-19-21.pdf |
HHSS 4/20/2021 3:00:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Sectional Analysis v. B 4.22.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Sponsor Statement v. B 4.22.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DHSS-MS 4.9.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DCCED-DOI 4.9.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DOA-DRB 4.12.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Letters of Support as of 5.6.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 -Additional Support Received as of 5.11.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| CS HB 58 (L&C), v. I.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Letter of Opposition - AK Family Action.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| Amendment #3 to HB 204.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Public Comment, Eric Croft, 5.17.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |
| HB 204 Supporting Document - Legal Memo, 2.5.20.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 204 |