Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/07/1999 06:07 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 11(JUD)
"An Act relating to good time credits for prisoners
serving sentences of imprisonment for certain
murders."
Senator Dave Donley restated that Alaska had liberal good-
time provisions. There was a growing concern among victims
that those serving time for first and second degree could
have inappropriate early release through the good time
release. There was a national movement that sentences be
understandable. It would be too expensive to institute an
across the board change to the state's 33% good time
release so he proposed applying this to those serving fist
and second-degree murder sentences.
He realized that many serving sentences for those crimes
had lengthy terms, but felt that through good time release
programs, the sentences served were greatly reduced.
He noted there would be a substantial fiscal impact in the
future. However, he felt the national 85% standard was
appropriate and should be applied to these crimes. Moving
closer to honesty in sentencing also appropriate.
Early release of murderers sent a bad message to the
community.
He felt there was a logical distinction between those who
committed murder and other crimes.
Tape: SFC - 99 #81, Side B 6:55 PM
Senator Al Adams commented that if every state had the same
sentencing for crimes, this would be appropriate. Because
Alaska had higher sentences, they would be serving too much
time. He discussed the issue of high medical costs for
housing older prisoners.
Blair McClune commented that there could be * challenges to
the original bill. He felt that was less of an issue with
the CS. He hoped the committee would consider the amount
of time it would take a prisoner to reenter the community
after a lengthy prison term. He suggested housing them in
a halfway house or similar facility. He agreed that truth
in sentencing was important.
Bruce Richards commented that Senator Dave Donley covered
the issues of the bill. He noted that the department
submitted a zero fiscal note because the fiscal impact
would be realized beyond the years listed on the notes. He
did a prediction of their current prisoners. He estimated
the first year impact would be $53X,000. It was a policy
call with a significant impact.
The cost would continue to increase with geriatric costs.
He testified that inmates tended to have a higher abuse of
their own bodies and therefore geriatric problems began at
the age of 50.
Senator Al Adams noted that Alaska sent many prisoners to
Arizona, which recently implemented the 85% standard. He
wondered if those prisoners were affected by that. Bruce
said they were not.
Senator Dave Donley commented on the public support of the
death penalty. He felt that was in part due to the
perception that murders served very short sentences. This
bill may be a cheaper alternative than the high cost of the
death penalty.
Senator Al Adams had not seen the survey done by Senator
Randy Phillips and questioned the social make-up of those
questioned.
Senator Dave Donley reiterated his stance on the importance
of the bill despite the fiscal impact.
Senator Dave Donley made a motion to move from committee.
Senator Al Adams objected. The bill was reported out by a
vote of 9-1. Senator Al Adams cast the nay vote.
Break 7:06 PM / 7:16 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|