Legislature(2025 - 2026)BUTROVICH 205
05/12/2025 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB167 | |
HB35 | |
SB9 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 167 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 35 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 9-SURRENDER OF INFANTS; INF. SAFETY DEVICE 2:02:22 PM CHAIR CLAMAN announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 9 "An Act relating to the surrender of infants; and providing for an effective date." CHAIR CLAMAN said this is the third hearing of SB 9 in the Senate Judiciary Committee. [The committee adopted Amendment 3 to CSSB 9(HSS), version G, in the previous hearing.] The intention is to consider the adoption of committee substitute version T. 2:02:37 PM CHAIR CLAMAN solicited a motion. 2:02:40 PM SENATOR KIEHL moved to adopt the committee substitute (CS) for SB 9, work order 34-LS0085\T, as the working document. 2:02:55 PM CHAIR CLAMAN objected for purposes of discussion. 2:03:06 PM BREANNA KAKARUK, Staff, Senator Matt Claman, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, Presented the Explanation of Changes for SB 9 from version G to version T. [Original punctuation provided.] Explanation of Changes Senate Bill 9: Version G to Version T Page 2, line 15-17: Removes the authority of the Commissioner of the Department of Family to designate additional appropriate locations for an infant safety device beyond the approved listed designated facilities as requested by the department. Page 4, lines 4-8: Deletes assessment considerations for determining whether to approve a proposed infant safety device and adds the requirement that the infant safety device must be installed, operated, and maintained according to the manufacturer's guidelines and regulations that are adopted by the Department. Adds that the infant safety devices must be inspected upon installation and annually by the manufacturer or the manufacture's designee, and inspected monthly by the designated facility that installed the device. These inspections are required to be logged by the designated facility and must include the testing of the device's alarms, cameras, climate control systems, and locks. 2:04:31 PM SENATOR TOBIN asked about page 4, lines 4 5 6 7 who covers the cost 2:05:00 PM SENATOR MYERS, speaking as sponsor, replied 2:06:20 PM SENATOR TOBIN who is going to pay for the cost of the inspection. 2:07:07 PM SENATOR MYERS said an individual from Safe Haven Baby Boxes is available to answer questions, the manufacturer could potentially be a small cost to the fire department, but they do not have to install one, 2:08:06 PM CHAIR CLAMAN perspective on the language in subparagraph 6 on page 4, the language that reads upon installation , tend to implies that it is on them to pay for the inspection there is noting to suggest Baby Boxes is online 2:08:54 PM CHAIR CLAMAN invited Mr. Kelsey to introduce himself, describe his position with Safe Haven Baby Boxes, and make a brief statement about his perspective on SB 9, then remain online to take questions. 2:09:11 PM JOE KELSEY, Co-Founder and Senior Project Coordinator, Safe Haven Baby Boxes, Woodburn, Indiana, Testified by invitation and answered questions during the discussion of SB9. Safe Haven Baby Boxes (SHBB) has an initial program fee, which covers the manufacture of the baby box plus the initial training and testing for the baby box to go to the location. The location typically pays for a contractor to install the baby box, and/or hooking an alarm system up it. Speaking about a fire station, the alarm communicates with the dispatch center locally to that station. Annual fee. 2:10:47 PM CHAIR CLAMAN asked $500 fee of getting someone there, so one of the queries I have 2:11:30 PM MR. KELSEY replied, it is $500, but does anticipate the cost will be higher to get there, airfare, hotel, car, no profit, we check the mechanics of the box, answer questions, bring more supplies, we want to make sure the locat 2:12:42 PM CHAIR CLAMAN in the other states where you have boxes setup today, do you have someone in Los A 2:13:03 PM MR. KELSEY 2:13:06 PM CHAIR CLAMAN and is there 2:13:15 PM MR. KELSEY replied that we do not use a contractor, 72 hour turn around, 2:13:56 PM CHAIR CLAMAN do you have boxes in Hawaii MR. KELSEY replied no, AZ and ID two farthest places 2:14:16 PM SENATOR TOBIN asked the inspection process, like looking at a fire extinguisher, or bed,who regulates you MR. KELSEY replied that he has a letter from the FDA that they are not 2:15:38 PM CHAIR CLAMAN invited the bill sponsor to make closing comments. SENATOR MYERS expressed appreciation to the committee and the DOF?for helping put the bill together. 2:16:11 PM CHAIR CLAMAN based on Mr. Kelsey's testimony it is not a $500 cost to do the inspection 2:16:30 PM SENATOR MYERS I understand your concern, but at the outset the cost will be discussed and ti will be something to plan cost for, but it is important [CHAIR CLAMAN removed his objection to the adoption of CSSB 9, version T, as the working document.] 2:17:05 PM CHAIR CLAMAN solicited the will of the committee. 2:17:07 PM SENATOR KIEHL moved to report CSSB 9, work order 34-LS0085\T, from committee with individual recommendations and any accompanying fiscal note(s). 2:17:26 PM CHAIR CLAMAN found no objection and CSSB 9(JUD) was reported from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
CSHB 35 version O 5.12.25.pdf |
SJUD 5/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 35 |
CSSB 9 version T.pdf |
SJUD 5/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
HB 35 Explanation of Changes version T to version O 5.12.25.pdf |
SJUD 5/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 35 |
SB 9 Explanation of Changes version G to version T 5.12.25.pdf |
SJUD 5/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
SB 9 Letter of Support- City of Fairbanks 4.23.2025.pdf |
SJUD 5/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
Corrected HB 35 Explanation of Changes version T to version O 5.12.25.pdf |
SJUD 5/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 35 |