Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/27/1995 01:30 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SJUD - 2/27/95
SB 3 ANTITRUST EXEMPTION FOR FISHERMEN
SENATOR DUNCAN, sponsor of SB 3, read a sponsor statement to the
committee. He noted the Senate passed an identical bill to SB 3
last year, however the measure did not reach the House floor for a
vote. SB 3 allows commercial fishermen to form associations to
collectively negotiate raw or processed fish prices with
processors, however it does not authorize processors to agree among
themselves. It only covers collective bargaining between fishermen
and a processor or a group of processors. SB 3 gives a state
antitrust exemption as a first step, which is necessary to
obtaining Congressional approval for a federal exemption. SB 3
would stabilize Alaska's fishing industry. SB 3 also removes
ambiguities between state and federal laws.
Number 339
JERRY McCUNE, President of the United Fishermen of Alaska,
testified in support of SB 3. He commented that during a strike in
Bristol Bay, the processors were invited to discussions, however
under the Sherman Antitrust law, processors cannot collectively
gather to discuss prices, therefore they were unable to
participate.
SENATOR TAYLOR expressed concern that the passage of SB 3 would
create a second step in which the processors will demand the same
exemption so that they can collectively gather to determine prices.
MR. McCUNE replied SB 3 forbids that practice, as does the federal
law. He added the fishermen are the self employed individuals
bargaining with the industry.
Number 367
SENATOR TAYLOR agreed, but pointed out that neither party can do
that under current law, therefore once one party is given the
exemption, the other might request the same. MR. McCUNE noted
processors can back out of negotiations and post a price.
DORNE HAWXHURST, President of Cordova District Fishermen United
(CDFU), testified in support of SB 3. She stated the CDFU supports
the measure for three reasons: it clarifies ambiguities in
existing state law; it evens the playing field for fishermen; and
it removes inconsistencies between federal and state laws.
Number 406
ED CRANE testified on his own behalf in support of SB 3. He
emphasized the strength of his personal conviction resulting from
his many years of involvement in agribusiness. He stated most
other states have an antitrust exemption and he felt SB 3 will help
to set the scene for changes necessary to the fishing industry as
they must have stability in supply and price to compete in world
food markets. He commented adversarial relationships between
harvesters and processors have to end, and SB 3 will help to make
that happen.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked Dwight Perkins and Dean Paddock if they were
opposed to SB 3. Both replied negatively, and Mr. Paddock noted he
strongly supported SB 3.
SENATOR GREEN moved SB 3 out of committee with individual
recommendations. There being no objection, the motion passed.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|