Legislature(2013 - 2014)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/27/2013 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB27 | |
| SB2 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 2 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 27 | ||
SENATE BILL NO. 2
"An Act enacting the Interstate Mining Compact and
relating to the compact; relating to the Interstate
Mining Commission; and providing for an effective
date."
9:39:01 AM
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, stated that SB 2 would allow Alaska
to become a full member of the Interstate Mining Compact
Commission (IMCC). She explained that full membership would
give the governor an active vote which would give the state
a broader voice on mining discussions at the national
level. She shared that the IMCC was a coalition of mining
states that join together to represent natural resource
development and environmental protection as it related to
mining. She furthered that there were currently 19 member
states and that Alaska was one of 6 associate member
states. She said that the IMCC recognized the basic
importance of the mining industry and the essential balance
between the country's need for minerals and the protection
of the environment. She noted the various elements of the
compact found in the bill. She spoke to the fiscal note,
and stated that the dues were based on the amount of
minerals that were produced in each state. She pointed out
that the highest dues were paid in West Virginia and that
Alaska could experience annual dues of approximately
$35,000 per year, not including the provisions for travel
to compact meetings. She stated that the membership could
be cancelled at any time.
9:42:06 AM
Senator Hoffman remarked that it was odd that western
states were only associate members.
She explained that the most prolific mining states to date
had been eastern states. She said that all of the associate
western states were in the process of gaining full
membership. She added that Montana was evaluating joining
the compact as well.
9:42:55 AM
Senator Dunleavy remarked that the eastern states with full
membership were huge coal producers.
9:43:12 AM
Co-Chair Meyer wondered why a state would not join. He felt
the cost of joining the IMCC was minimal when compared to
the benefits of membership in the compact.
Senator Giessel responded that she did not know why some
states were not yet full members. She noted that associate
members had lower dues. She shared that some of the
associate members had similar legislation in place to gain
full membership in 2013.
9:44:26 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough wondered when the original compact
was formed.
Senator Giessel replied that the IMCC was formed in April
of 1971.
9:45:53 AM
Senator Bishop wondered if full membership would give the
state more standing against Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) overreach.
ED FOGELS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES responded that full membership would include
voting rights for the state to influence the policy
direction of the compact.
9:47:51 AM
Mr. Fogels stressed that mining was becoming increasingly
important to the state; the state now had 7 operating mines
that were strong economic contributors to the state
economy. He said that the state had a strong regulatory
permitting process and he gave assurances that all of the
active mines had strong environmental records. He shared
that the governor had tasked the department with crafting a
more efficient permitting system. He relayed that work with
federal agencies was a key part of changing the process. He
asserted that the IMCC would foster a better and more
productive relationship with the federal government. He
reiterated the benefits of joining the compact. He offered
the example of IMCC pushback against the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) concerning hard rock mining bonding
efforts. He shared that he was the governor's current
designee to IMCC and he believed that full membership would
put the state in a stronger position.
9:51:33 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough queried the travel line in the fiscal
note of $20,000.
Mr. Fogels responded that a key component to membership in
the IMCC was attending meetings which required travel to
various locations. He noted that travel expenses for
associate membership had been covered in departmental
budget to this point. He felt that it was important to show
a commitment that in the long-term the state would be
represented at all meetings.
9:52:50 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough if DNR had expended all the money
that was currently assigned for travel in the department's
budget.
Mr. Fogels referred the question to another staff member
within the department.
9:53:14 AM
Senator Dunleavy understood that Alaska had more coal than
any other state in the country.
Mr. Fogels replied in the affirmative.
9:54:27 AM
DEANTHA CROCKETT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA MINERS
ASSOCIATION, (AMA) testified in support of SB 2. She said
that it was increasingly difficult for mineral development
to happen under federal constraints. She believed that
having regulators engaged with IMCC would give the
association a better understanding of how to communicate
with federal agencies. She felt that full membership would
give Alaska greater access to expertise in the mining
field. She said that miners in the state were having a lot
of trouble with MSHA issues and oversight and that the IMCC
had been helpful.
9:57:51 AM
MICHAEL SATRE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COUNCIL OF ALASKA
PRODUCERS, spoke in support of SB 2. He said that the state
should join as a full member in order to ensure a smooth
permitting process and to join with other states in
fighting against federal overreach. He said that the
council believed that the state was a leader in permitting
of all resources. He believed that the state's process was
rigorous, science based, transparent and predictable. He
felt that the state needed to go out and benchmark
permitting procedures with other states. He concluded that
a combined voice was always better than a single voice.
10:00:57 AM
GREG CONRAD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INTERSTATE MINING COMPACT
COMMISSION (via teleconference), testified in support of SB
2. He stated that Alaska had joined the IMCC as an
associate member in 2006. He said that the legislative and
regulatory climate on the federal level highlighted the
importance for the state to maintain a strong voice. He
pointed out that IMCC was recognized and respected in
Washington D.C. as an expert on mining issues. He said that
the act of participation and commitment of the full members
carried the organization forward in terms of support and
leadership. He relayed that full membership would put the
state in a position that would be favorable for resource
development. He stated that the state's full membership
would be recognized by those who worked with the compact on
a regular basis and would bring about a greater degree of
recognition and influence regarding Alaska's participation
in the compact.
10:05:43 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough wondered what the dues were for the
associate membership.
Mr. Conrad replied that Alaska's associate member dues were
$15,000 annually.
10:07:03 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough queried the number of times the IMCC
met each year.
Mr. Conrad replied that there were two formal meetings per
year, with the possibility of other meetings.
10:07:43 AM
Senator Hoffman wondered whether other states had
considered joining the associate member status.
Mr. Conrad replied that Montana, Arizona, and Idaho were
considering associate membership.
Co-Chair Meyer CLOSED public testimony.
10:09:42 AM
Vice-Chair Fairclough MOVED to REPORT SB 2 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
SB 2 was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with previously published fiscal notes:
FN1 (DEC), FN2 (DNR), and FN3 (LAW).
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 2 - IMCC Annual Report 2011.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Dues Assessments 2014 and 2015.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Membership 2013.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Welcome.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support AMA.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support CAP.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support Mr. Steffy.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Letter of Support RDC.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - List of Testifiers.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Sectional.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |
| SB 2 - IMCC Testimony on AK SB 2 Senate Finance.pdf |
SFIN 2/27/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 2 |