Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124
04/05/2013 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB2 | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Alaska Oil and Gas Commission | |
| Big Game Commercial Services Board | |
| Board of Game | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SB 2 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 2-INTERSTATE MINING COMPACT & COMMISSION
1:07:08 PM
CO-CHAIR SADDLER announced that the first order of business
would be SENATE BILL NO. 2, "An Act enacting the Interstate
Mining Compact and relating to the compact; relating to the
Interstate Mining Commission; and providing for an effective
date."
1:07:54 PM
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, Alaska State Legislature, sponsor,
informed the committee SB 2 allows Alaska to become a full
member in the Interstate Mining Compact Commission (IMCC), which
is a coalition of mining states that joins together to share
best practices, discuss issues, and work to better protect the
environment, public safety, and employees, as well as develop
mining resources. She emphasized Alaska's vast resources are
not just in oil and gas, but in many minerals such as gold,
silver, and zinc. At this time, Alaska is an associate member
in IMCC, however, becoming a full member gives the state a
broader voice nationally and allows for collaboration with other
states on issues related to the best practices in mining.
1:09:20 PM
ED FOGELS, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), expressed DNR's support
for SB 2. Mining activity in Alaska has been increasing - there
are now seven operating mines that contribute economically to
their regions - and which DNR successfully regulates, manages,
and oversees. All of the mines have excellent environmental
records. However, DNR seeks to improve its permitting system
and its collaboration and relationship with the federal
government. For seven years, Alaska has been an associate
member of IMCC, an organization that brings together the
regulatory and environmental programs from twenty-five mining
states. In this forum, states exchange information on
successful programs and learn from each other, and most
importantly, bring the full weight of influence from member
states to bear on Congress and federal agencies. Further, IMCC
has been instrumental in many federal and state issues affecting
permitting and regulatory processes; for example, IMCC is
meeting with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to
address the possible impacts of its initiative to regulate
bonding for hard rock mining throughout the nation. This
initiative has the potential to reduce each state's mining
regulatory and permitting processes, and IMCC is working to
maintain strong state programs. In addition, IMCC has arranged
that states meet regularly with the director of the Mine Safety
and Health Administration (MSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, to
ensure efficient and reasonable safety regulations. As the
governor's current designee to IMCC, Mr. Fogels has seen the
benefits membership has brought to the state, and full
membership will allow the state to become a voting member, help
set the policy direction of the organization, and contribute to
its voice in Washington, DC. He encouraged the committee to
support the bill.
1:13:06 PM
GREGORY CONRAD, Executive Director, Interstate Mining Compact
Commission (IMCC), stated his support of SB 2 and expressed his
belief the bill arose from Alaska's experience as an associate
member of IMCC since 2006. In today's regulatory climate, it is
important for state governments to be heard in Washington, DC,
and for their concerns to be understood, particularly when
related to mining and environmental issues. His organization is
recognized by many for its experience and expertise; for
example, IMCC testimony on behalf of member states has been
requested for Congressional hearings on topics such as Good
Samaritan protections for hard rock abandoned mine cleanup,
stream protection requirements, hard rock financial assurance
requirements, legislation, and state grant programs. Other
agencies and organizations utilize IMCC also. Mr. Conrad
referred to IMCC's annual report which was included in the
committee packet, noting IMCC is called upon to provide member
states' recommendations to Congress and federal regulators and
agencies. He stated that full and active participation by full
members carry IMCC forward, and Alaska's full membership will
ensure its vote in guiding the direction of the IMCC and thereby
lead the organization; Alaska will also continue to garner its
present benefits that include communications, meetings, programs
and initiatives. In addition, Alaska's full membership will be
recognized by Congress and federal agencies, and entitle the
state to heard and supported by the other member states. He
concluded that IMCC's focus allows it to delve deeper into the
concerns of mining and related environmental protection issues.
Mr. Conrad encouraged the committee to approve the proposed
legislation.
1:18:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked Mr. Conrad to explain the IMCC dues
structure.
MR. CONRAD explained the member states' dues are calculated by
apportioning the dues based on IMCC's anticipated budget through
two mechanisms: equal shares among the full member states and
pro-rata shares based upon the value of both coal and hard rock
mineral production. The production values, equal shares, and
pro-rata shares are used to calculate the total dues for each
state, which are reduced by other revenue sources such as
registration and publication fees. In further response to
Representative Johnson, he said the percentages are intended to
reflect the total percentages for all of the full member states.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked if Alaska's first year of dues would
be approximately $40,000.
1:22:33 PM
MR. FOGELS advised there is a cap on the dues, even if
production goes up.
MR. CONRAD added he has calculated the total value of mineral
production for Alaska, based upon figures from the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) and the Energy Information
Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy, for non-coal
and coal, is about $3.5 billion. Therefore, he estimated dues
for Alaska are approximately $35,000, depending on how many full
member states are participating.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked whether gravel pits are included in
IMCC's purview.
MR. CONRAD believed USGS figures do include aggregate.
CO-CHAIR SADDLER inquired as to the location of the other member
states.
MR. CONRAD answered that the member states are located as
follows: the Western states are Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico,
Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, and North Dakota; the Mid-continent
states are Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana,
Louisiana, and Missouri; and the balance are in the East. Some
states only have non-coal production such as New York, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Nevada. In response to Co-Chair
Saddler, Mr. Conrad assured the committee that IMCC represents
the full panoply of issues, although in the 1970s IMCC was
primarily focused on issues pertaining to coal. In fact, IMCC
recently hosted hard rock minerals symposiums in Salt Lake City
and in the East.
1:27:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked whether IMCC participated in events
sponsored by the Council of State Governments or the National
Conference of State Legislatures.
MR. CONRAD said yes, IMCC is involved with a number of other
state government organizations, including a close relationship
with the Council of State Governments. Other connections
include the Western Governors Association, the National
Governors Association, the National Association of Abandoned
Mine Land Programs - EPA, the Association of Clean Water
Administrators, and the Environmental Council of the States.
1:29:41 PM
CO-CHAIR SADDLER opened public testimony.
1:29:52 PM
MIKE SATRE, Executive Director, Council of Alaska Producers,
said he is a resident of Juneau and the Council of Alaska
Producers is a nonprofit trade association representing large
producing metal mines and major metal developmental projects in
the state. His organization is in support of SB 2 and
participation by the state in IMCC as a full member. His
organization supports the bill because Alaska is a global leader
in permitting and regulation of the mining industry and
participation in IMCC will keep state officials informed. Also,
he advised that local, state, and federal mining regulations can
be troublesome, and IMCC deals with the federal government from
a position of strength.
1:32:15 PM
DEANTHA CROCKETT, Executive Director, Alaska Miners Association
(AMA), stated AMA is a statewide industry association that
represents the six large metal mines in the state, the coal
mine, exploration projects, placer miners, contractors,
engineering firms, and others. She agreed with previous
testimony in support of SB 2, adding that federal regulation is
becoming increasing difficult and IMCC provides a powerful voice
in Washington, DC. Ms. Crockett said her research revealed that
other Western states have benefitted greatly from their
membership in IMCC. She reminded the committee that the mining
industry is the second largest industry in the state.
1:34:23 PM
MARLEANNA HALL, Project Coordinator, Resource Development
Council for Alaska, Inc. (RDC), stated that RDC is a membership-
funded, statewide business association representing the tourism,
forestry, oil and gas, mining, and fishing industries. Her
organization supports the passage of SB 2 and she pointed out
the state should encourage investment and worldwide interest in
Alaska's mineral potential. Joining IMCC will show leadership
in advocating for a healthy and stable permitting regulatory
system. The importance of mining is recognized nationwide, and
RDC believes IMCC will bring a collective voice to Washington,
DC, to advocate for states' rights. Full membership in IMCC
will allow Alaska to benefit in many ways, such as partnering on
federal and state issues and promoting the mining industry in
Alaska and nationwide. She urged for the timely passage of SB
2.
1:35:42 PM
CO-CHAIR SADDLER, after ascertaining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON offered his strong support for SB 2, and
provided an example to illustrate that individual state
resolutions and letters are not as effective as those from an
organized group of states with like concerns, such as the
Council of State Governments-WEST. He encouraged the committee
to support the bill because partnering in this type of
organization is invaluable.
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON relayed her personal experience as a
member of a group from several states that made a difference.
CO-CHAIR FEIGE has heard it said that "the federal government is
not your friend," and expressed his support for the proposed
legislation in order to accumulate friends for Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON recalled reviewing the compact at the time
Alaska became an associate member of IMCC. He observed that
there is nothing in the compact that would override Alaska state
law. He restated the benefits of joining IMCC as a full member
and offered his support for SB 2.
1:41:22 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE moved to report SB 2 out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, SB 2 was reported out of the House
Resources Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB2 Fiscal Note DNR-MLW-2-9-13.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 Fiscal Note DOA-DRB-1-22-13.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 IMCC About.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 IMCC Annual Report 2011.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 IMCC Dues Assessments 2014 and 2015.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 IMCC Membership.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 IMCC Testimony in SFIN.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 Letters of Support (AMA, CAP, RDC, UAF).pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 Southeast Conference Resolution.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 Sectional.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| SB2 Version A.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
SB 2 |
| AOGCC - Cathy Foerster.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BGCSB - Gene Peltola.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BGCSB - Henry Tiffany.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BGCSB - James Atkins.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BGCSB - James Jones.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BGCSB - Karen Polley.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BoF - Claude Webster.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BoF - Thomas Kluberton.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BoG - Nathan Turner.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |
|
| BoG - Peter Probasco.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2013 1:00:00 PM |