Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
03/21/2012 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation: Kuspuk School District | |
| SB8 | |
| HB330 | |
| HJR39 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 8 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 330 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HJR 39-URGING THE STATE TO OPT OUT OF NCLB
9:49:52 AM
CHAIR DICK announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 39, Urging the Governor to direct the
Department of Education and Early Development to prepare and
submit a request for flexibility under the federal Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to obtain a waiver of select
requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and to
direct the commissioner of education and early development to
provide a comprehensive improvement plan that will guarantee
that students in the state will be adequately prepared for
academic and vocational success.
9:50:15 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BOB MILLER, Alaska State Legislature, presented
HJR 39, paraphrasing from a prepared statement, which read as
follows:
I sincerely hope this committee and others will allow
due diligence when considering this critical, national
and statewide issue.
Without doubt, the United States enjoys international
recognition for having the best universities and
colleges in the world. Regardless of any indicator or
statistic, America remains the Great Land of
Opportunity in no small part because of our
exceptional structure of higher education. Aspiring
students from all over the world know the value of
learning in our institutions. With that, much of the
focus on K-12 education must be pointed at practical
and successful approaches to college- AND career-ready
requirements within a structured time and with limited
resources. Lawmakers and professionals responsible
for our children's education should have a centralized
priority; to prepare our children with the knowledge
and ability to pursue a higher education if they so
choose, or to be ready to transition directly into
careers and/or technical training and trade schools.
Alaska will always have unique challenges and
potential unlike any other state. This includes a
continuous discussion on how best to provide Alaska's
kids with the best and most comprehensive learning
opportunities. Each impact potentially shaping the
personal future of our children requires our deepest
consideration.
House Joint Resolution 39 encourages the Governor to
provide his guidance and leadership in order to seek a
federal waiver and options that will effectively
relieve the state from the problematic No Child Left
Behind (or NCLB) law. The US Secretary of Education
has projected that nearly 90% of the schools
nationwide will fail to meet Adequate Yearly Progress
under the current NCLB mandated standards. By the end
of this year, more than 40 other states will be
granted waivers with no negative impact on federal
education funds, along with opportunities to develop
an Alaskan designed, rigorous and effective education
system. Of primary concern though, if Alaska fails to
apply before the 2014 deadline, the state could face
unnecessary fiscal and administrative difficulties.
One particular feature motivating so many states to
apply for a waiver involves the ability to design and
implement what is known as "student growth models."
With this capability, communities and school districts
will be able to incorporate value-added, socio-
economic factors to customize their local academic
curriculum and performance standards. As a provision
related to Adequate Yearly Progress, Alaska's
Department of Education and Early Development would be
allowed to request a measure of student growth in its
definition. This would be applied to the reporting
performance against the Annual Measureable Objectives
or AMO's. (College-ready and common core standards
are just two facets of a complex system though.)
While standards are an integral component, much more
is involved in development of a powerful, effective
state instructional system. For nations with the most
successful educational systems in the world, complete
integration is the only known approach that has
enabled them to produce their leading results. As
Marc Tucker, the president of the National Center on
Education and the Economy stated last month, "if we
want to have standards that have an important effect
on student performance, then they have to be
operational, not aspirational."
In closing, NCLB was an honest attempt to address
educational needs in America, but the extraordinary
dynamics of teaching and learning continues to demand
an unending refinement of approaches. There is
widespread movement in almost every state towards
getting relief from NCLB mandates. At the same time,
states are jumping at the opportunities offered by the
waivers, which will further empower an entire network
of educators. With so many states eagerly working
towards this new opportunity, I'm very confident that
this valuable prospect will work for all of Alaska.
With the majority of states aggressively pursuing this
unprecedented education reform, Alaska is bound to
benefit from the contribution of every education
leader, including the members of this committee. We
are being handed a great opportunity here; the chance
to exit from a system that sets us up to fail, the
chance to dodge the stigma and financial penalties of
that failure, as well as increased federal oversight.
But most importantly, the chance for us to design,
create and customize Alaska's education system by
Alaskans for Alaskans. Who knows what Alaska needs
better than the people who live, work, play and learn
here? I hope you will join me in supporting this
resolution
9:56:02 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE referred to the resolution, page 3, line 7,
and asked for clarification of the date specified and the
penalties that may be incurred.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER deferred.
TROY BOUFFARD, Staff, Representative Bob Miller, Alaska State
Legislature, responded that the September deadline is the third
deadline set by the U.S. Secretary of Education.
9:57:15 AM
CHAIR DICK confirmed that the September date is one point in a
number of rolling deadlines, and asked about any consequences if
a waiver is not granted.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER responded that it is speculative, but all
states that have applied have been granted a waiver.
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE inquired about any financial penalties.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER reported that approximately $430 million
is received from the federal government, and if AYP (annual
yearly progress) is not attained, some of those funds will be in
jeopardy, and as well as other possible consequences.
9:59:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON opined that a positive outcome of NCLB
has been to cause each state to assess existing educational
systems, discover shortcomings, and strategize improvements.
Referring to the sponsor statement, she paraphrased an excerpt
which read [original punctuation provided]: "No Child Left
Behind does not account for the geographic conditions, cultural
considerations or economic challenges unique to Alaska." Prior
to NCLB prompting, she opined, Alaska didn't do a particularly
good job of addressing these points. The federal act has not
been an easy mandate to comply with, and there will be some
relief in receiving a waiver for opting out; however, she
maintained, it has not been without some benefit for bringing
focus to bear in areas that might otherwise have remained in the
shadows.
10:01:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked why a resolution is being submitted
versus a statute.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER indicated that this is a strategic,
coordinated effort being put forward in conjunction with
Alaska's delegation to Washington, D.C.
[HJR 39 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 8 Sectional 27-LS0084A-revised 2-23-2013.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
SB 8 |
| SB 8 2011 AK Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
SB 8 |
| SB 8 Sponsor Statement rev 4-4-2011.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
SB 8 |
| HJR039 Version A.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HJR 39 |
| HJR039 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HJR 39 |
| HJR 39 States Requesting Flexibility NCLB.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HJR 39 |
| HJR 39 Education Brief Common Core Standards 032112.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HJR 39 |
| CS HB 330 Version E.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 330 |
| CS HB 330 Version E sponsor statement 032012.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 330 |
| CS HB 330 Version E sectional analysis 032012.pdf |
HEDC 3/21/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 330 |