Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
01/30/2012 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR31 | |
| HB276 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 276 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HJR 31-DECLARE CENTRAL PARK A WILDERNESS AREA
1:05:17 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 31, Urging the President of the
United States and the United States Congress to acquire the area
commonly known as Central Park on Manhattan in New York City on
behalf of the federal government; urging the United States
Congress to declare Central Park to be a wilderness area and to
prohibit any further improvement or development of Central Park
unless authorized by an Act of Congress.
1:05:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KYLE JOHANSEN, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, described a trip he took to New York City where the
green of Central Park contrasted with the rest of the city. A
few years later he read a description of the flora and fauna
that were present in this area prior to Henry Hudson's arrival.
He described Manhattan as an epicenter of finance and culture in
the U.S. and Central Park as an icon to which everyone can
relate. He said he thought of using Central Park to raise the
level of discussion about what the State of Alaska wants to do
in relation to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). He
opined that since President Bill Clinton vetoed legislation [to
open ANWR to drilling], the conversation has been repetitive and
unproductive.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN related that since bringing forth this
proposed resolution, he has been surprised at the support for
it. He said that several co-sponsors have signed on to HJR 31,
and a news story written locally was picked up by several major
news venues. Further, he said, the word of HJR 31 has been
spread across social networks and Internet search engines, and
there is a grass roots discussion about Alaska's biggest issue.
1:10:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN noted incidentally that ANWR legislation
is currently being heard by the U.S. House Resources Committee,
which may move to the House Floor in the next couple weeks.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN admitted that HJR 31 is most likely not
going to happen; however, he emphasized that if the federal
government wanted it to happen, it would. He said that is how
he feels about some of the ideas the federal government has
about how Alaska should develop its land. In the 1970s, he
related, New York City was running a deficit and was considering
all options to balance its budget. One of the proposals was to
give Central Park to the government, but city fathers at the
time considered that if they were to do so, then Central Park
would be in control of the federal government and they would
have no say in how that park was managed. He stated, "I think
that really summed up where I was trying to go with this."
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN told the committee that there were
business and resource development groups in the capitol eager to
testify, but he asked them to refrain in the interest of time.
1:13:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked whether the sponsor would be willing
to consider an amendment such that short of the proposed
resolution passing, the land that is Central Park could be given
back to the appropriate tribe of Native Americans.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN responded that the Lanape tribe is
mentioned in the proposed resolution, and the tribe has received
a copy of the resolution, but has not yet responded. He said he
would be willing to support such an amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON commented he understands the intent of the
language and hopes it will generate dialogue that helps Alaska.
1:15:02 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE said he signed onto the proposed resolution
because the point needs to be made. He related that many
passengers from Manhattan have ridden in his plane, and they had
no real basis for knowing what a wilderness is. A lot of
restrictions get attached to a wilderness designation, he said,
and "like the city fathers of New York who were certainly
looking out for the people of New York by resisting the
federalization of Central Park, ... we need to look out for the
increasing ... federal control over Alaska."
1:16:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI said although he appreciates the humor
in which HJR 31 was written, he feels that it is a waste of the
committee's time given the number of bills that are still
sitting in the committee. He said he thinks the committee needs
to focus on how to address energy concerns across the state. He
said passing this proposed resolution out of committee will
backfire. People already have a negative opinion of Alaskans
and think that Alaskans are paid to live in the state. He said
the legislature needs to act like adults to prove that the state
is capable of managing its own resources, and he opined that HJR
31 does not get to that point. He stated that he would not
support HJR 31 in committee or on the House floor.
1:18:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER shared that after HJR 31 was introduced,
she received comments from constituents who were not happy. She
said at the time she defended HJR 31 as a humorous way of
drawing attention to a serious topic. She said she was asked
how much it costs the state to draft and carry forward the
proposed resolution, and at the time she said she would not look
into that; however, she said she now may contact that person and
try to produce a figure as to the cost. She concurred with
Representative Kawasaki that there are other issues on which the
committee should focus, and said she is only present out of
respect for the process.
1:19:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN responded that he respects the members'
comments, but the topic is about opening ANWR. He admitted that
the proposed resolution was written as satire, but disagreed
that it is a waste of time. He stated that any time the state
can bring up the issue of opening ANWR for resource development
is important to the state's future development. He said there
has not been this much attention to ANWR since President Bill
Clinton vetoed legislation. He opined that not continuing on
with the resolution would have negative consequences, and he
emphasized how serious it is to him that the legislature takes
this proposed resolution seriously.
[CO-CHAIR FEIGE held over HJR 31.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HRES HJR 31.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HJR31 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HB276 version A.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HB276 CS version M.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HB 276 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HB 276 NenBasinLocmap.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HB 276 NenYF-BasinLocmap.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES HB276 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 276 |
| HRES HB276-DNR-O&G-01-30-12.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 276 |
| HRES HB276-DOR-TAX-01-30-12.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 276 |
| HRES-HB 276 DNR -Sedimentary Basins-Nenana.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 276 |
| HJR 31 New York Times Blog article.pdf |
HRES 1/30/2012 1:00:00 PM |