Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120
02/21/2026 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR22 | |
| HJR23 | |
| HB290|| HCR10 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HCR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HJR 22-FEDERAL CONST. CONVENTION: TERM LIMITS
3:18:42 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 22, Requesting the United States
Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution of the
United States to set a limit on the number of terms that a
person may be elected as a member of the United States House of
Representatives and as a member of the United States Senate; and
requesting the United States Congress to call for a
constitutional convention of the states to propose a single
amendment to the Constitution of the United States to set a
limit on the number of terms that a person may be elected as a
member of the United States House of Representatives and as a
member of the United States Senate.
3:19:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FRANK TOMASZEWSKI, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor introduced HJR 22. He stated that a conducted in
January 2025 showed that 84 percent of Alaskans favor term
limits. Twelve states have similar legislation, and 14 others
have legislation in committees. He said it takes 34 states to
bypass Congress to call a constitutional convention.
3:22:00 PM
CONNOR MERRINER, Staff, Representative Frank Tomaszewski, Alaska
State Legislature, presented and answered questions on behalf of
Representative Tomaszewski, prime sponsor of HJR 22.
MR. MERRINER began a PowerPoint presentation titled "HJR 22:
U.S. Term Limits," [hard copy in the committee file]. On slide
2, he outlined reasons why there is a need for U.S. term limits:
to restore a citizen legislature, bring state-specific and
private sector experience to D.C. On slide 4, he shared reasons
for restoring a citizen legislature. As states were intended to
be laboratories of innovation, bringing state experience to D.C.
is important. He shared reasons on slide 6 to bring private
sector expertise to D.C. He reiterated the bill sponsor's
statement that 84 percent of Alaskans support implementing U.S.
term limits. Currently, 12 states have passed calls for term
limit amendments, while 14 states have similar legislation.
3:26:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ST. CLAIR asked how long resolutions last.
3:26:10 PM
CONSTANTIN QUERARD, Regional Director, U.S. Term Limits, replied
that resolutions last into perpetuity. States can rescind
resolutions.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether, when a constitutional
convention is called, the issue is just limited to term limits.
MR. MERRINER replied that it doesn't open the entire
constitution, it is just a single item resolution.
CHAIR CARRICK asked, since this is a resolution, what would
prevent it from becoming a more open discussion.
MR. MERRINER replied a delegation is called for a proposed
amendment to the constitution. The states must ratify that
amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked in other democracies whether
there are term limits.
MR. QUERARD replied yes, he can provide a list.
3:29:47 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HJR 22.
MR. QUERARD began his invited testimony in favor of HJR 22. He
said he is here on behalf of Alaskans who are in support of this
cause. The presentation already outlined several good reasons
for this change and there are many more. Everyone seems to
support it for a lot of different reasons. Congress is
dysfunctional because [the length of time members of Congress
are in office]. Incumbents lean into seniority as a selling
point. It takes a while to get influence in Congress, usually
ten to twenty years.
3:33:10 PM
ED MARTIN, representing self, testified in support of HJR 22.
This is a very good subject for state affairs. He said he has
voted in many elections since 1973. U.S. Representative Don
Young stayed in Congress his whole career. He said too many
people have made this a career. Their oath is subject to their
egos instead of the people. He asked the committee to please
pass this resolution to Congress.
3:35:05 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining no further testimony, she
closed public testimony on HJR 22.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT stated that she hasn't come to terms
with term limits. She comes from a rural area with fewer
people. The seniority system gives more say on what happens in
the legislature. She said there should be an exception for
rural folks.
MR. QUERARD replied that with a small delegation like Alaska, it
is difficult. He said states with term limits use more subject
area expertise. He stated this would be good for a state like
Alaska to send congressmen with expertise in an area that
interests the state. With term limits, there will be times when
the congressman has seniority.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT replied that she doesn't disagree. The
state system is partisan. She said at the state level, there is
power and influence in staff. At the federal level, there is
professional level staff with this knowledge.
3:40:47 PM
MR. QUERARD stated that staff influence is not a bad thing. He
is more concerned about a chairperson not having subject area
expertise and being managed by the staff.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT commented on investment potential. She
asked, "How many years has Chuck Grassley been in office?"
MR. QUERARD replied that he is the longest serving congressman.
3:42:25 PM
CHAIR CARRICK said she appreciated the presentation. She
acknowledged that term limits are supported by Alaskans. She
shares some of the concerns that Representative Himschoot
expressed. Legislators are public figures and the staff is less
accountable to the public.
MR. QUERARD said he disagrees that legislators are accountable
to their districts. He said congressmen are not as accountable
to voters. The system is broken and the re-election rates are
high. He gave examples of a couple of Senators. Staff
expertise will not eliminate institutional knowledge, but staff
get hired or fired. Voters don't have many options. He said
quality staff survive and staff and members work well together.
This job wasn't ever meant to be a career.
CHAIR CARRICK said she appreciates the dialog. She still has
some concerns with challenges on election reform and the money
in politics. The United States needs to address that Congress
is like a retirement home. She liked the potential for more
subject-matter experts who work well across the aisle.
3:49:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT said that some of the ballot issues are
due to open primaries and rank choice voting.
MR. QUERARD replied that rank choice is a newer idea. The
incumbent is still the one to win the election. He asked, "What
changes can be made that will stand up to the courts?" Term
limits are popular in all states.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated he is excited to hear that the
committee is interested in campaign finance reform as he is
sponsoring a bill on this issue. He is a member of U.S. Term
Limits. He agrees that the United States needs to stop the
retirement home in Congress. As an elected official, he
oversees the staff as a leader.
3:54:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that she fully supports [term
limits] and has co-sponsored previous related bills. The first
President realized that it was not healthy to stay in office.
The Founding Fathers were visionaries. Term limits encourage
more people to participate in self-governance. She opined that
12-year term limits provide a good balance and a respectable
amount of time. She is in support of this resolution.
3:57:20 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that HJR 22 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 22 Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |
| HJR 22 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |
| HJR 23 Version A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE-02-13-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Backup LRS Report Imbalance of Governors Initial Budget Requests FY 17-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR23 Support Documents - Presentation.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HB 290 Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sponsor Statement Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sectional Analysis Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 HCR 10 Slides STA.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Sponsor Statement Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Secitonal Analysis Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Backup Uniform Rule 49.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HB 290 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-02-20-2026.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HCR 10 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-2-20-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HJR 22 Presentation 2-21-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |