Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
02/28/2014 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR22 | |
| HJR10 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HJR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HJR 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 22
Requesting the United States Congress to call a
convention of the states to propose amendments to the
Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal
restraints on the federal government, limit the power
and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit
the terms of office of federal government officials;
and urging the legislatures of the other 49 states to
request the United States Congress to call a
convention of the states.
1:36:17 PM
Co-Chair Austerman relayed that HJR 22 had been previously
heard by the committee.
REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON, SPONSOR, discussed that the
resolution proposed to hold a convention of the states. She
detailed that Alaska wanted to be a part of the convention
if 35 states all passed the resolution. She elaborated that
following the passage of the resolutions the legislature
would determine the number of delegates it wanted to send
and which issues it wanted the delegates to speak on. She
noted that if delegates could be replaced with alternates
if they did not speak the way the legislature wanted. She
addressed the concept of a "runaway" [runaway
constitutional convention] and relayed that legislatures
had control over the topics; once an amendment was finished
if 35 delegates voted yes it would return to the state
legislatures. Subsequently the issue would need approval
from 38 states. She stated that there were numerous checks
and balances.
Representative Costello asked if a convention would be
limited to the items listed in the resolution.
Representative Wilson replied in the affirmative. She
expounded that legislatures could narrow the scope further
and did not have to speak on the issues.
Representative Costello did not believe there was a
provision for states to rescind a call for a convention.
She believed that the states would have to call for a
convention on the same topic in order to be counted
[towards the 35 states]. For example, if two states called
for a convention on term limits and other states called for
a convention unrelated to term limits, the states calling
for a convention on term limits would not be counted. She
believed the list in the states' "call" would determine the
convention agenda.
1:39:08 PM
Representative Wilson shared Representative Costello's
understanding of the issue. She detailed that if
resolutions differed Congress would have the ability to
determine that the resolutions did not match [closely
enough]; therefore, resolutions like HJR 22 had been
drafted similarly in other states. She noted that it would
be difficult for the resolutions to all make it through the
states' House and Senate. She stressed the importance of
making the states' resolutions as similar as possible.
Representative Gara had asked for a legal opinion on
whether a runaway constitutional convention could occur. He
recalled that the U.S. Constitution left open the
possibility that a convention would not be limited to the
topics passed by the states. He detailed that per language
in the U.S. Constitution after the circumstances happened a
constitutional convention would be called. He was uncertain
how the legal opinion read and would share it with
committee members.
Representative Wilson explained that the resolution
designated that Alaska wanted to be at the table if 35
other states passed similar resolutions. She stated that it
was not necessary to talk about each of the items outlined
in the resolution. She elaborated that the legislature
would need to create legislation specifying how delegates
would be chosen (states only received one vote), and which
specific topics would be included. She stressed that the
convention would not be able to discuss items outside of
the realm specified by the state legislatures. She
explained that 35 states would be required to accept the
amendment once it was put to a vote at the convention.
Subsequently, the issue would return to the state
legislatures; at that time 38 legislatures would be
required to pass the amendment without making any changes.
She reiterated that it was up to the State of Alaska to be
as specific as it chose.
1:42:06 PM
Representative Gara communicated that he would share the
legal opinion with Representative Wilson.
Co-Chair Austerman commented that his personal preference
would be to concentrate on balancing the federal budget.
The number of different issues proposed in HJR 22 gave him
pause. He noted that he had discussed his concerns with the
sponsor previously.
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT HJR 22 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note.
Representative Costello OBJECTED for discussion. She
pointed to the one previously published zero impact fiscal
note from the Legislature.
There being NO further OBJECTION, HJR 22 was REPORTED out
of committee with "no recommendation" and with one
previously published zero fiscal note: FN1 (LEG).
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 10 - Version C - HFIN CS.pdf |
HFIN 2/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |