Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
03/28/2011 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB85 | |
| HJR19 | |
| SCR9 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 85 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SCR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HJR 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HJR 19-URGING US TO RATIFY LAW OF THE SEA TREATY
4:22:48 PM
CO-CHAIR WAGONER announced the consideration of HJR 19 and asked
for a motion to bring the resolution before the committee.
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN moved to bring CSHJR 19(RES) before the
committee, version D. [Version D was transmitted from the House
to the Senate 3/16/11.]
CO-CHAIR WAGONER objected and asked Representative Herron to
present the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE BOB HERRON, speaking on behalf of the House
Special Committee on Economic Development, Trade, and Tourism,
sponsor of HJR 19, stated that U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski
supports this resolution, which urges the U.S. Senate to ratify
the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It
is important to all U.S. interests in the use and development of
the high seas off Alaska. Under the treaty, the U.S. can gain
another 150 miles beyond the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). This
386,000 square mile area has great economic and scientific
potential and some would say that by not ratifying the treaty
the U.S. is surrendering sovereign rights. Ratification will
make the U.S. a leader in the international Arctic community and
is in the best interest of Alaskans and all U.S. citizens.
SENATOR FRENCH referenced page 3, lines 21-22, and asked if all
the current Joint Chiefs of Staff support ratification.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON responded that all the Joint Chiefs of
Staff since Ronald Reagan was president have stated support for
ratification.
SENATOR FRENCH asked for confirmation that every single joint
chief to a person supported ratification.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON offered his understanding that those
collective Joint Chiefs of Staff have supported ratification.
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN observed that every military leader that had
come before the Senate in the last three years unanimously
supported ratification.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER commented that he ordinarily would not support
anything that abrogates sovereignty to an international panel,
but he became very supportive after seeing the Coast Guard
presentation that showed Chinese operations in waters that, with
ratification, would be under the control of the U.S.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER opened public testimony.
4:28:55 PM
CAITLYN ANTRIM, Executive Director, Rule of Law Committee for
the Oceans, Arlington, Virginia, said she has worked on
virtually all of the Law of the Sea conventions since 1982, and
was asked to give a summary of the convention and to identify
areas of interest. She said one area of particular concern is
the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) where the U.S. has management
authority out 200 nautical miles. In the Arctic the U.S. has the
authority to impose marine environmental protection provisions
in ice-covered areas if the regulation is based on scientific
evidence and non-discrimination among users. She highlighted
that that authority was Russia's principle legal mechanism for
instituting control of the northern sea route. On the
continental shelf, the U.S. would have control of mineral
resources in the seabed beyond the EEZ. With indications of
hydrocarbon in the seabed, control may extend as far as 600
miles from shore. The area is even more promising than when the
original provisions were drafted. She said that navigation is
also a critical component of the convention, and the most
critical part is control of straits that would otherwise fall
within the 12-mile territorial sea. This would apply to the
Bering Strait and would give the U.S. authority to establish
traffic separation schemes.
MS. ANTRIM explained that the primary reason that the U.S.
didn't initially join UNCLOS was disagreement on the management
of the resources of the deep seabed beyond the continental
shelf. Ronald Reagan identified six areas as essential and would
only recommend the U.S. join the convention if those were fixed.
In 1994 all six objections were resolved and the U.S. became a
provisional member. The U.S. helped shape the international
regime during its four years of provisional membership, but the
matter was not brought before the U.S. Senate until 2003.
Efforts to move the process forward have been underway since
that time.
MS. ANTRIM said it's important for the U.S. to join UNCLOS to
protect commercial navigation, naval navigation and aviation
rights of over-flight. Furthermore, telecommunication companies
are emphatic about the need for the convention in order to lay
seabed cables and pipelines. UNCLOS clarifies the ways that
companies can get exclusive rights and title to the minerals in
the seabed and continental shelf without which they can't get
investment capital or foreign partners. It clearly specifies
that coastal states are solely responsible for dealing with
environmental issues. Governments may engage in international
discussion about environmental provisions, otherwise it is
entirely a domestic issue. Joining UNCLOS will give the U.S.
more authority to shape the ocean regime not only in the Arctic
but also in areas like the South China Sea. The convention gives
the U.S. sovereign rights over the minerals of the continental
shelf and deep seabed, and recognizes the right for the U.S. to
determine environmental regulations through its own laws.
4:34:06 PM
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN asked what seabed attributes off the north
coast of Alaska might extend up to 600 miles from shore.
MS. ANTRIM replied the definition of "continental shelf" now
says that natural extensions of the continental material are not
subject to an outer limit of 350 miles that applies to ridges.
In 1980 all the Arctic states agreed and specifically noted that
the 350 mile limit did not apply to the Chukchi Plateau.
Research by Larry Mayer that was done with the Coast Guard
indicated that the continental material and the continental
slope beyond the material extends considerably further than
previously thought. Photographs of the seabed indicate gas
upwelling that is sometimes indicative of hydrocarbon deposits
so it's a combination of the law opening up for an extended
claim and the geology justifying a claim to that distance.
CATHY WASSERMAN, Executive Director, Alaska Municipal League
(AML), stated that AML passed a resolution urging Congress to
ratify UNCLOS because it would enhance the economic development
of Alaska municipalities. Research indicated a huge list of
people that have supported the convention over the last 20-30
years, whereas just a small group has been opposed and in fear
of giving away sovereignty. She emphasized the importance of
taking action, because of the rapid increase in interest and
activity in the Arctic.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER closed public testimony and asked the pleasure
of the committee.
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN moved to report CS for HJR 19 from committee
with individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal
note(s). Without objection, CSHJR 19(RES) moved from the Senate
Resources Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSHJR 19 sponsor statement.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - EDT and RES Changes (for Senate Resources).pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Leg Research Report (revises 3.11.11).pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Senate Resources Hearing Request.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Zero Fiscal Note.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR019C.PDF |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| SCR 9_Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Version A.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_Juneau AC Letter.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_Map.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_McDowell Taku Report ExSumm.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_News Articles.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |