Legislature(2019 - 2020)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
05/07/2019 03:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR10 | |
| HJR14 | |
| HJR9 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 14 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HJR 14-URGING SUPPORT FOR NOME DEEP-DRAFT PORT
3:39:24 PM
CHAIR BISHOP reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of House Joint Resolution 14 (HJR 14).
3:40:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HJR 14, explained that the resolution asks
for three things regarding the Nome deep draft Arctic port.
First, it urges the Alaska congressional delegation to pursue
infrastructure funding. Second, it asks the Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities to send a letter to the
Alaska congressional delegation supporting the deep draft Arctic
port in Nome. Third, it asks the Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities to work collaboratively
with the City of Nome to provide technical support. The
resolution does not ask for funding from the state. The deep
draft Arctic port project has been underway for some time. Due
to previous funding, the project is ready and able to complete
final feasibility and design. HJR 14, if passed, expresses the
legislature's and the department's support for the critical
maritime transportation project in Nome.
3:41:31 PM
JOY BAKER, Port Director, City of Nome, Nome, Alaska, testified
in support of HJR 14. She explained that the Arctic deep draft
port is a project that the City of Nome has been moving towards
for many years.
She addressed, "Arctic Deep Draft Port Study: Site Selection" as
follows:
• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department
of Transportation and Public Facilities evaluated 13
locations in the 2011-2015 "Alaska Deep Draft Arctic Port
Study."
• Nome was selected as the most cost-effective location for
further investigation and initial investment.
• Site selection was based on:
o Existing Port Infrastructure,
o Intermodal Connections,
o Uplands Support,
o Water Depth,
o Navigation Accessibility.
She noted that the project was paused when Royal Dutch Shell
pulled out of the Arctic in 2015.
She addressed, "Port of Nome Modification Feasibility Study" as
follows:
• 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act
(WIIN Act) provided new provisions to allow the Nome Arctic
Port Study to proceed:
o Remote and Subsistence Harbor Authority allows the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to include non-economic
factors in the study and design of projects in the
region.
o Requires that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
consult with U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S.
Coast Guard to:
square4 Identify national security benefits associated
with an Arctic deep draft port.
square4 Authorizes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
consider such benefits in determining whether an
Arctic deep draft port is feasible.
• New authorities enabled the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
execute a cost-share agreement with the City of Nome for
further investigation of an Arctic Deep Draft Port:
o Study schedule:
square4 Federal Cost-Share Agreement (FCSA):
• February 2018.
square4 Alternatives Milestone:
• June 2018.
square4 Tentatively Selected Plan:
• March 2019.
square4 Agency Decision Milestone:
• August 2019.
square4 MSC Transmittal of Final Report:
• March 2020.
square4 Chief's Report Signed:
• June 2020.
3:43:42 PM
MS. BAKER addressed, "Benefits of Developing Maritime
Infrastructure in the U.S. Arctic" as follows:
• Supports the people and communities in the region.
• Addresses elements of increasing maritime traffic.
• Responds to growing strategic interest in the region.
• Supports development of significant natural resource
potential.
• Prepares for unique marine environmental challenges.
• Captures benefits at regional, state and federal levels,
namely in the protection of:
o National Security,
o Life Safety,
o Environmental Safety,
o Economic Viability,
o Sustaining Culture.
She noted that Arctic maritime activity continues to rise due to
the available open water and increased interest in navigating
the Arctic waters for the purposes of commodity movement,
resource development, tourism, geopolitical and strategic
reasons.
MS. BAKER addressed, "Targeted Benefits of Expansion to Deeper
Water" as follows:
• National Security & Life Safety:
o Critical refuel and resupply support.
o Strengthen U.S. presence in Arctic.
• Environmental Safety:
o Reducing offshore fuel transfers.
• Economic and Cultural Sustainability:
o Lowering regional transportation costs.
• Tourism:
o Support increased ship calls with more ice-hardened
vessels in construction.
• Research:
o Enhanced mission support.
• Resource Development:
o Oil, gas, and mining resupply.
She said having a deep draft Arctic port in Nome will save
larger ships three to five sailing days to Dutch Harbor for
vessels transiting and working in the Arctic.
She said the additional scope of the feasibility study is to
provide safe, reliable, and efficient navigation for trans-
shipping fuel, cargo, and gravel through the Arctic region.
3:45:18 PM
She addressed, "Port of Nome Shore-Based Infrastructure
Development" as follows:
• Nome's Strategic Development Plan:
o Thirty-four acres of laydown property available for
use.
o Sixteen acres in development, more in planning phase.
o Moorage expansion area fully permitted and designed:
square4 Congestion will be mitigated in the Small Boat
Harbor.
o Haul-out facilities currently being upgraded and
expanded.
o Alaska Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities' improvements scheduled to 2021.
o Alaska Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities' Nome Port Road improvements scheduled for
2021.
• Port Reception Facilities:
o Federal, state, regional and local stakeholders should
work together to accelerate construction of port
facilities that meet International Maritime
Organization (IMO) Polar Code regulations to service
U.S. vessels as well as international traffic.
o Minimizing operational discharges helps:
square4 Protect Arctic marine environment for subsistence
hunting and fishing.
square4 Enhance maritime operations by extending vessel
duration in the region.
MS. BAKER said one of Nome's priority projects is developing a
port reception facility to accept all forms of ship waste from
the regional and Arctic maritime fleets. The project, which is
in the planning and design phase, is critical for protecting the
marine and environment which many use as a significant source of
subsistence foods across the region.
3:46:10 PM
She addressed, "Arctic Deep Draft Port: Path Forward" as
follows:
• Feasibility Study Tentatively Selected Plan:
o Extend Causeway 3,500 feet.
o Construct three docks in deep basin dredged to 40-foot
Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).
o Remove breakwater.
o Construct new 3,900-foot causeway with ship dock;
o Dredge existing outer basin to 28-foot MLLW.
• Project Delivery Schedule:
o Chief's Report scheduled to Congress in June 2020.
o Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 2018 allows
project to move into design upon signed Chief's
Report.
o Congress is expected to authorize the project in
FY2021-FY2022.
o Project bid and construction could start as early as
2023 and last through 2027.
She addressed, "Building an Arctic Deep Draft Port at Nome" as
follows:
• The City of Nome requests project support from the Alaska
State Legislature to do the following:
o Assist in bringing economic development to the region
to support jobs for Alaskan residents.
o Assist in sustaining the Alaska Native culture by
protecting marine food resources and the environment.
o Attract investment capital in maritime infrastructure
development through a variety of P3 agreements.
o Assist in generating long-term economic benefits to
the region, the state and the nation.
o Capitalize on opportunities to develop the Arctic's
natural resources while sustaining the environment.
o Provide suitable maritime infrastructure for Arctic
tour ships and attracting more ships to the state.
MS. BAKER said the City of Nome is not seeking funding from the
legislature but requests support for the projects with the
passage of HJR 14. The deep draft port project is essential for
supporting the region's economies, the state's natural
resources, and the nation's sovereignty and security. Therefore,
it is important to demonstrate the state of Alaska's support for
Nome's national project.
CHAIR BIRCH noted that he was the project manager for Nome's
causeway extension in the mid-1980s that the proposed project
will be adding to. He said he is very encouraged to see this
sort of initiative and direction. He asked if the rock for the
project will be locally sourced.
MS. BAKER answered yes; the rock quarry east of Nome has a
hundred-year life expectancy.
SENATOR BIRCH recalled that the quarry has good rock.
MS. BAKER replied that it is the highest quality rock along the
coast and sought out by many owners and project designers for
breakwater stone.
CHAIR BISHOP concurred with Senator Birch that the Nome rock
quarry has good rock.
3:48:53 PM
CHAIR BISHOP [opened public testimony].
3:49:22 PM
CHARLES LEAN, Vice Chair, Port Commission, City of Nome, Nome,
Alaska, testified in support of HJR 14. He pointed out that
Alaska has 50 percent of the nation's coastline and the Arctic
ocean waters are approximately half of Alaska's waters and
therefore the Arctic waters account for 25 percent of the
country's marine waters and Nome is the central port for the
Arctic waters. Nome's port is not only important as a regional
hub, but also for the nation. Freight passing through the Bering
Strait represents an approximate 40 percent reduction in travel
distance. Freight from Alaska going to the East Coast of the
U.S. would have reduced cost and is therefore important to
Alaska and the region.
3:51:11 PM
RICHARD BENEVILLE, Mayor, City of Nome, Nome, Alaska, testified
in support of HJR 14. He noted that the only two ways to get
from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean by water are the
Bering Strait and the Panama Canal. Nome is 70 miles from the
Bering Strait. Secondly, other Arctic nations are not looking at
the future, they are living in it as we speak. The United States
is lagging behind other Arctic nations in infrastructure and
strategic preparation. He emphasized that the world is coming to
Alaska.
CHAIR BISHOP concurred with Mayor Beneville's comments on other
Arctic nations.
3:54:08 PM
WILLIAM HARRINGTON, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska,
testified in support of HJR 14. He said as an Alaskan, the
buildout of an Arctic port in Nome is exciting to protect and
service the communities in the region. Coupled with the touted
railroad through Canada to the Lower 48, there will be centuries
of benefits for the northern half of the state. Eighty-five
percent of statewide freight passes through the Port of
Anchorage, a port located in an active earthquake zone is a
strategy that places all the eggs in one basket.
He said he encourages a push to open the state's northern
extremities to bring affordable and safe transportation via the
Nome port expansion and cross-boundary rail link. He added that
port expansion at Kotzebue and Bethel should be in the mix to
allow for direct delivery from Seattle to lower freight costs
and the cost of living throughout the state.
3:56:03 PM
CHAIR BISHOP closed public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE FOSTER highlighted that a recent newspaper
article warned of the dangers from Russian and Chinese
activities in the Arctic. He opined that there is a race for the
Arctic.
3:56:59 PM
SENATOR BIRCH moved to report HJR 14, version 31-LS0593\M from
committee with individual recommendations and attached zero
fiscal note.
3:57:15 PM
CHAIR BISHOP fund no objection and HJR 14 moved from the Senate
Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR014A.PDF |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| Nome ADDP - Senate CRA 2019.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014 Supporting Documents High North News Article 4-25-19.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014 Supporting Documents Project Milestones 4-25-19.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014 Senate Armed Services Committee Transcript (PAGE 61 IS THE IMPORTANT PAGE).pdf |
HTRA 4/18/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014 Supporting Documents Senate Bill 3021.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014 Supporting Documents Washington Post Article .pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR014-1-2-042419-DOT-N.PDF |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR009 Version M.PDF |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR009 Explanation of Changes A to M.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 - Sponsor Statement 3.5.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 - Supporting Document, EP Image Options 3.5.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Project Description.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Map 1.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Map 2 .pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Document Support List.pdf |
HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Article APM.docx.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Article ADN.pdf |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Alaska Federation of Natives.docx.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR10 Supporting Document - 2019 Support Exploration of Road Belt Electrical Line 3.28.19.pdf |
HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Ahtna Inc..pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| 2019-03-07 - Alaska Power Association Support for HJR10.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Alaska Power Telephone Company .pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Chickaloon Village Tradition Council.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Chitina Electric Inc Resolution.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Chitina Native Corp.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Chitna Electric Inc.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Copper Valley Chamber of Commerce.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Copper Valley Devlopment Association.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Copper Valley Electrical Association Resolution.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Golden Valley Electrical Association .pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Northway Traditional Council.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Supporting Documents Tanana Chiefs Conference.pdf |
HENE 3/14/2019 10:15:00 AM HRES 3/29/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/1/2019 1:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR010 version S.PDF |
SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 10 |