Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
04/10/2025 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB26 | |
| HJR14 | |
| Presentation: Department of Transportation's Role in Emergency Response | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 26 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 14 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HJR 14-PORT MACKENZIE & NORTHERN RAIL EXTENSIONS
1:28:56 PM
CO-CHAIR CARRICK announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 14, Supporting the completion of
the Port MacKenzie Rail Extension and the Northern Rail
Extension; supporting the increase in defensive capabilities at
Fort Greely, Alaska; encouraging a renewed commitment by the
Alaska Railroad to a community-minded approach to future rail
expansion; and encouraging the development of critical Arctic
infrastructure.
1:29:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE, as prime sponsor, introduced HJR 14. He
stated that the Northern Rail Extension project and the Port
MacKenzie Rail Extension project would strengthen the state's
infrastructure, defense capabilities, and resiliency. He stated
that Alaska's strategic location on the Arctic Ocean, coupled
with the growing defense operations at Fort Greely, underscores
the urgency for the need to complete the two rail extension
projects, as proposed by HJR 14.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated that the Northern Rail Extension
project would enhance the state's defense infrastructure. He
pointed out that the completion is 70 miles from Fort Greely and
Delta Junction, including the Tanana River crossing. He stated
that the Port MacKenzie Rail Extension project, with support
from the Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su) Borough and the Alaska
Railroad, is near completion. It would provide a range of
benefits, including reduced energy costs, reduced emissions, and
improved transportation costs of key goods, such as coal to tide
water. He pointed out that this extension project would align
with the current federal administration's goal of unlocking
Alaska's resources and increasing energy exports.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE suggested that the rail extensions would
alleviate road congestion, enhance supply chain resilience, and
create jobs, while ensuring greater affordability for Alaskans.
Furthermore, the proposed resolution would encourage the Alaska
Railroad to engage with local communities. He summarized that
the proposed resolution is not only about transportation
infrastructure, but also about securing Alaska's economic
future, strengthening defense, securing resiliency for residents
in the Interior, and enhancing energy security. He noted the
letters of support for HJR 14.
1:33:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES commented on the letter of support from
the mayor and manager of the Mat-Su Borough. She noted that the
letter was not addressed to most of the committee members and
questioned the reason for this. She also questioned why the
extension projects had stopped.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE responded that the letter in question was
addressed to the delegation of the Mat-Su Borough, as this was
who requested the letter in support. In response to the second
question, he explained that the projects had not stopped because
of funding, and he pointed out the bridge over the Tanana River
had cost $2 million. He added that it is the longest bridge in
the state, but "it goes absolutely nowhere." He noted that the
money has been spent, but the project is not complete. He
pointed out that $184 million of state money was spent on the
Port MacKenzie Rail Extension project. He said, "It's the
largest, most expensive snowmobile trail in the world," and he
suggested it is now a "highway for criminals." He explained
that there are 7.2 miles left to construct. There had been a
right-of-way issue, he said, but once this was resolved, there
was no more funding.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE, in response to a series of follow-up
questions, stated that the railbed is there, but there are no
tracks. He added that it is in good shape, except for some one-
lane bridges. He responded that there is no railroad steel laid
down yet, only a roadbed. He continued that the railroad has
estimated the cost of completion to be $290 million; however,
from other sources, he has heard a maximum estimate of $150
million. He posed the question of why it would cost the Alaska
Railroad more. He noted that the Federal Railroad
Administration has also provided lower estimates, and he
expressed the opinion that politics has influenced the
estimates. In response to a question concerning the number of
tracks laid in the last 25 years, he stated that no miles of
running track have been laid. He responded that he would
provide the committee with maps of the projects.
1:42:35 PM
CO-CHAIR CARRICK commented on the letter of support from the
Alaska Railroad, which listed the cost of completing the 32-mile
Port MacKenzie Rail Extension project as $275 million to $300
million. She questioned how much this would be per mile, and
she questioned whether this cost would be reflected in any other
rail project.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE responded that this would be around $14
million per mile. He expressed the opinion that a fraction of
the cost would finish the project, and he suggested that the
high price is because of politics. In response to a question
concerning whether the railroad has been proactive, he expressed
the opinion that the Alaska Railroad's $484 million estimate
speaks for how proactive the railroad has been. He stated that
the Alaska Railroad had applied for a federal grant from the
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI)
Program last year, but it had been rejected because the
application was incorrect. He noted that the railroad plans to
apply for the grant again this year; however, the railroad has
said it does not have the needed letters of support from
Alaska's Congressional Delegation and the governor. He
expressed the understanding that support has been voiced from
these entities. He suggested that the railroad might be
concerned about the anchor tenant in Port MacKenzie; however, he
expressed doubt on the concept of an "anchor tenant." He argued
that for the growth of resources in the state, the Port
MacKenzie Rail Extension project would need to be completed.
1:47:53 PM
CO-CHAIR EISCHEID referenced the letter in support from the
Alaska Railroad and expressed the desire to ask the railroad
questions concerning the estimated cost. He questioned the
intent of the language on page 3, lines 15-19, of the proposed
resolution, which requests that the railroad renew its
commitment to a "community-minded approach".
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed the observation that the Alaska
Railroad has struggled with community relations and those who
live on the right-of-way. He suggested that this would urge the
railroad, which is owned by Alaskans, to take a more community-
minded stance with everything.
CO-CHAIR EISCHEID expressed appreciation for the sentiment;
moreover, he voiced skepticism about organizations and
government entities that are based away from communities. He
noted that metropolitan planning organizations have the same
concern with the Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities' ability to stay sensitive to local concerns.
1:51:35 PM
CO-CHAIR CARRICK expressed appreciation for the inclusion of the
clause under discussion. She noted that encouraging the
railroad to be more accessible to Alaskans also relates to the
proposed legislation [HB 26] heard earlier in the meeting. She
shared a personal anecdote about railroad travel and its
affordability in the past. She noted that now flying and
driving are less expensive and quicker than rail travel in the
state. She opined that if it were less expensive, more people
would use the railway. She stated that the resolution is
"critically" important, noting the support from mine developers
and industrial purposes. She suggested a clause in the proposed
resolution to highlight this purpose.
1:53:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that this type of legislation has
been offered before, and it passed. He opined that HJR 14 could
be used in support for the CRISI grant. He spoke to the success
of the railroad, as it has not gone bankrupt and not asked the
state for money. He commended the Alaska Railroad on doing an
admirable job, especially through the COVID-19 pandemic;
however, he reiterated that the Alaska Railroad works for
Alaskans.
1:54:54 PM
CO-CHAIR CARRICK announced that HJR 14 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 14 Ver A. Support Letter. MSB Mayor and Manager.4.1.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR 14 Ver A.SupportLetter.CityofHouston.4.2.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR14 Ver A.Support Letter.City of Fairbanks.04.02.2025.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR14 Ver A SponsorStatement 3.27.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR14 Ver A.Support Letter Nova Minerals. 4.3.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR 14 Ver A. Support Letter ARRC.04.03.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HJR Ver A Support Letter.UpperSusitnaCC.4.8.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| HB 26 Amendment Packet.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HJR 14 Ver A. Support Letter Denali Borough.4.10.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |
| 20250410 HTRA DOTPF Emergency Response - FINAL.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HJR14 Ver A Support Letter BigLakeCC.4.12.25.pdf |
HTRA 4/10/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 14 |