Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120

05/09/2025 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
01:27:40 PM Start
01:28:38 PM Presentation(s): Legal Implications of Prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska's Elections
02:59:50 PM HJR10
03:30:05 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Delayed to 5 min. Following Session --
*+ HB 198 AFFIRM. DEFENSE FOR DISABLING TRAP/SNARE TELECONFERENCED
<Bill Hearing Canceled>
+ Presentation: Legal Implications of prosecuting TELECONFERENCED
American Nationals in Alaska's elections by
Department of Law, Division of Elections,
Permanent Fund, Motor Vehicles, and American
Samoa Community Leaders
+= HJR 10 CONST AM: PERMANENT FUND; POMV;EARNINGS TELECONFERENCED
Moved HJR 10 Out of Committee
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
         HJR 10-CONST AM: PERMANENT FUND; POMV;EARNINGS                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
2:59:50 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR GRAY  announced that the  final order of business  would be                                                               
HOUSE  JOINT  RESOLUTION  NO. 10,  Proposing  amendments  to  the                                                               
Constitution  of  the State  of  Alaska  relating to  the  Alaska                                                               
permanent fund  and to appropriations  from the  Alaska permanent                                                               
fund.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
3:00:11 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The committee took an at-ease from 3:00 p.m. to 3:02 p.m.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
3:02:13 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  CALVIN  SCHRAGE,  Alaska  State  Legislature,  ss                                                               
prime  sponsor, reminded  the committee  that HJR  10 proposes  a                                                               
constitutional amendment that would  combine the Alaska Permanent                                                               
Fund ("the fund") into a  single account structure with a maximum                                                               
5  percent draw  based on  a 5-year  average of  the 6  preceding                                                               
years.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
3:03:04 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  VANCE  moved  to  adopt Amendment  1  t  HJR  10,                                                               
labeled 34-LS0648\A.3, Nauman/Wallace, 5/5/25, which read:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     Page 1, line 5:                                                                                                            
          Delete "twenty-five"                                                                                                  
          Insert "fifty [TWENTY-FIVE]"                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR GRAY objected.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
3:03:12 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE explained that  Amendment 1 would strengthen                                                               
the  state's  long-term  fiscal stability  by  ensuring  that  50                                                               
percent  of all  mineral  related  revenues are  constitutionally                                                               
deposited into  the fund.   Currently, only  25 percent  of these                                                               
revenue  are constitutionally  protected,  and  an additional  25                                                               
percent  is directed  by statute,  but the  amount is  subject to                                                               
legislative appropriation.   She  said Amendment 1  would elevate                                                               
this  statutory practice  to a  constitutional mandate  to remove                                                               
these  funds from  political discretion  and protecting  them for                                                               
future generations.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR GRAY said he wished  the proposed amendment had been passed                                                               
40  years  ago, but  not  today  in  the state's  current  fiscal                                                               
climate.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
3:05:42 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP  said Amendment  1 would result  an immediate                                                               
and  significant  decrease in  general  fund  (GF) revenue  in  a                                                               
rapidly  declining   oil  price  environment.     He  added  that                                                               
Amendment 1  would make paying  dividends and services  orders of                                                               
magnitude more difficult.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
3:06:37 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE agreed with  the previous comments that in                                                               
a different fiscal  environment he could be  persuaded to support                                                               
such  an   amendment.    He   recalled  the   previous  committee                                                               
discussion  on  the need  for  flexibility  to meet  current  day                                                               
obligations and stated his opposition to Amendment 1.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR GRAY maintained his objection.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
3:07:36 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   VANCE  said   she's  open   to  including   some                                                               
transition time and asked the committee, "If not now, when?"                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
A roll call vote was  taken.  Representatives Underwood and Vance                                                               
voted in favor  of Amendment 1.   Representatives Mina, Eischeid,                                                               
Kopp, and Gray  voted against it.  Therefore,  Amendment 1 failed                                                               
by a vote of 2-4.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
3:10:04 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  VANCE  moved to  adopt  Amendment  2 to  HJR  10,                                                               
labeled 34-LS0648\A.4, Nauman/Wallace, 5/5/25, which read:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     Page 2, lines 2 - 5:                                                                                                       
          Delete "Each fiscal year, the legislature may                                                                         
     also appropriate  from the permanent fund  an amount to                                                                    
     pay costs  associated with  investments made  under (a)                                                                    
     of  this  section,   including  operating  expenditures                                                                    
     associated with managing the fund."                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR GRAY objected.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
3:10:10 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE  explained that  Amendment 2 would  remove a                                                               
provision in HJR 10 that  would authorize withdraws from the fund                                                               
to  pay  for investment  and  operating  expenses of  the  Alaska                                                               
Permanent Fund  Corporation (APFC).   She shared her  belief that                                                               
the   Constitution  of   the  State   of   Alaska  ("the   Alaska                                                               
Constitution") should  not carveout  an area that  quietly spends                                                               
form  the fund  beyond  the structured  percent  of market  value                                                               
(POMV) draw.   The additional  language would undermine  the POMV                                                               
limit by permitting ongoing withdraws  for internal costs outside                                                               
of  the cap.   She  reported that  current operating  costs total                                                               
$240 million annually,  which if Amendment 2 were  to pass, would                                                               
be funded  statutorily by GF obligations  or the POMV draw.   She                                                               
said  Amendment 2  would provide  intentional oversight  into how                                                               
money is  being spent  from the fund,  force a  conversation, and                                                               
fold these costs into the cap.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR GRAY asked APFC to comment on the proposed amendment.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:13:33 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
DEVEN  MITCHELL,   Executive  Director,  Alaska   Permanent  Fund                                                               
Corporation (APFC),  said in terms  of practicality,  Amendment 2                                                               
would reduce the  draw rate and shared  an example.    He said he                                                               
would  prefer that  APFC's budget  be maintained  in its  current                                                               
status where its netted out prior  to transfers being made to the                                                               
state, which is  more in line with the practices  of other trusts                                                               
and those entities that manage them.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
3:17:22 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  KOPP  reminded   the  committee  that  investment                                                               
managers  are compensated  for excellent  performance.   He  said                                                               
there  is no  binding language  in  this provision,  and that  it                                                               
simply  provides  legal  authority  for  APFC  to  request  costs                                                               
associated  with investment.   If  amendment 2  were to  pass, he                                                               
suggested that the  legislature could never say,  "yes," to these                                                               
requests.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
3:19:16 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE  clarified that  this is an  additional draw                                                               
on top  of the  POMV transfer  to pay  for costs  associated with                                                               
investment  operations,  which  is  close to  $250,000  from  the                                                               
corpus of  the fund.   Without Amendment  2, she  explained these                                                               
costs would  essentially be exempted.   She  said her goal  is to                                                               
maintain  ultimate  legislative  authority while  protecting  the                                                               
fund.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
3:23:10 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
A roll call vote was  taken.  Representatives Underwood and Vance                                                               
voted  in favor  of  Amendment 2.    Representatives Kopp,  Mina,                                                               
Eischeid,  and Gray  voted against  it.   Therefore, Amendment  2                                                               
failed by a vote of 2-4.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE emphasized the  importance of the fund and                                                               
the threats  that face it.   He expressed his he  appreciation to                                                               
the committee.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
3:24:49 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP  thanked Representative Vance for  the spirit                                                               
of   Amendment  2,   noting  that   the  costs   associated  with                                                               
investments are already  paid from the fund's earnings.   He said                                                               
HJR  10 would  protect the  ability to  pay future  dividends and                                                               
state expenses and  reflects 20 years of APFC's  requests to make                                                               
such a change to protect the fund.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
3:26:08 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EISCHEID  shared his  belief  that  HJR 10  would                                                               
protect future dividends.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
3:26:47 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   VANCE   clarified   that  HJR   10   would   not                                                               
constitutionalize a  dividend, it would simply  protect the fund,                                                               
which the  legislative majority  has expressed  a desire  to grow                                                               
for state  services.  Until other  pieces of the fiscal  plan are                                                               
put  forth, she  said she  could not  support the  constitutional                                                               
amendment.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:28:57 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP moved to report  HJR 10 out of committee with                                                               
individual  recommendations and  the  accompanying fiscal  notes.                                                               
There being  no objection, HJR 10  was reported out of  the House                                                               
Judiciary Standing Committee.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  GRAY authorized  Legislative  Legal Services  to make  any                                                               
necessary technical or conforming changes.                                                                                      

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
05.08.25 HJUD DOA DMV American Nationals Response.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
Driver License and ID Application 9-2022 to 10-2023.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
Driver License and ID Application 2-2022 to 9-2022.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
Driver License and ID Application 10-2023 to Present.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
Federal_Voter_Registration_ENG.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
Voter Registration Form.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
OLVR Screenshots.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s elections.
HJR 10 Amendment 1 Rep. Vance.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
HJR 10
HJR 10 Amendment 2 Rep. Vance.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
HJR 10
Memo, Being Born in American Samoa is Not a Crime.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
Legal Implications of Prosecuting American Nationals in Alaska’s Elections.
HJR 10 Backup for Amendment A.3 to HJR 10.pdf HJUD 5/9/2025 1:00:00 PM
HJR 10