Legislature(2015 - 2016)BARNES 124
02/02/2015 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR10 | |
| HJR9 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HJR 9-ENDORSING ANWR LEASING
1:46:55 PM
VICE CHAIR HAWKER announced that the next order of business is
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 9, Urging the United States Congress
to pass legislation to open the coastal plain of the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas development; urging the
United States Department of the Interior to recognize the
private property rights of owners of land in and adjacent to the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; relating to oil and gas
exploration, development, production, and royalties; and
relating to renewable and alternative energy technologies.
CO-CHAIR TALERICO, sponsor, stated that Joshua Banks of his
legislative staff would introduce HJR 9.
1:48:34 PM
JOSHUA BANKS, Staff, Representative Dave Talerico, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Talerico, sponsor,
introduced HJR 9. He said that when Congress passed the [1980]
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), a
small section of land within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
was set aside for future resource development. Known as the
"1002 study area", this section makes up 1.5 million acres, or 8
percent, of the refuge. Under ANILCA, Congress must give its
approval for oil and gas development in the 1002 area or for
designating it as Wilderness. Though there have been many
attempts to receive congressional approval for drilling the 1002
area, none have been successful. Therefore, HJR 9 serves as
continued encouragement for Congress to approve this drilling.
There are multiple reasons for supporting development of the
1002 area. First, the land within the 1002 area that would
likely be developed for oil makes up 1 percent of the 1002 study
area and 0.08 percent of the entire refuge, leaving 99.92
percent of the refuge free from oil development. Additionally,
with today's drilling technology, the footprint for drill pads
continues to be even smaller and the volume of oil that one pad
can get from the ground continues to increase.
1:50:25 PM
MR. BANKS continued, stating that even though oil drilling has
been ongoing in Prudhoe Bay for decades where the Central Arctic
Caribou Herd migrates, the herd's population has increased from
5,000 to 67,000 caribou. Thus, despite intense drilling on the
North Slope, Alaska's caribou herds have not been negatively
affected and drilling can continue to happen in Alaska without
hurting caribou and without harming Native subsistence rights.
MR. BANKS stated that as oil flow in the Trans-Alaska Pipeline
System (TAPS) continues to decline down to nearly 500,000
barrels per day, the need for new oil continues to be great.
Opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would allow an
estimated 700,000 barrels per day of oil at the peak to flow
down TAPS and increase the life of this valuable piece
infrastructure. According to the 2002 McDowell Group report
(provided in the committee packet), even at $24 per barrel,
Alaska could receive up to $500 million per year in royalties
from the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge.
MR. BANKS noted that HJR 9 is very similar to resolutions that
have been passed by the legislature, with only a few minor
changes from the resolution passed two years ago in the 28th
Alaska State Legislature. Primary changes consist of who the
resolution is addressed to, including U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan
and specifying that U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski is chair of the
U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Another
change is on page 2, line 13, where instead of a generic gas
pipeline, the Alaska liquefied natural gas project begun under
Senate Bill 138 is specifically named. Also added is the daily
oil flow of up to 700,000 barrels per day that could come from
the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, which is an estimate done
by the U.S. Department of Energy. Lastly, two "be it resolved"
clauses in the past resolution were very similar, so HJR 9 has
combined those into one clause.
1:53:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON observed that the last resolve [page 4,
lines 16-20] talks about the 90/10 split and the state's
resistance to suffering a coercion from the federal government.
He said his understanding has always been that the 90/10 split
refers to state land and that is why everyone applauds the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for selecting the Prudhoe
Bay area for state ownership in the late 1960s. He asked
whether it is meant that the state should not accept less than
that on federal land even though the statehood compact doesn't
suggest that the state is entitled to more than 10 percent.
MR. BANKS replied that his understanding of the Statehood Act is
that the state receives 90 percent of royalties and he believes
that is what is being encouraged in the resolution.
VICE CHAIR HAWKER inquired whether Representative Josephson has
specific language in HJR 9 that he is looking at.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON responded that he is looking at the
language on page 4, lines 18-19.
1:54:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON then drew attention to the whereas
clause on page 2, line 26. After re-reading the clause he said
he had no question.
1:55:54 PM
VICE CHAIR HAWKER related the history regarding the issue of the
state being forced to take less than the 90 percent it was
provided under the Statehood Act. He explained that at one
point in time there was talk of a 50/50 split between the state
and the federal government [in return for opening the 1002 area
to development], rather than the 90/10 split the state is
entitled to, as a way to move a transaction forward. Thus, that
provision in HJR 9 is looking at an historic event that was once
suggested.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON clarified that the 90/10 split is on
federal land, not on state land. Other than on federal land,
the state gets 100 percent of the royalty.
VICE CHAIR HAWKER further clarified that that is on federal
lands within the state of Alaska.
1:57:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR drew attention to page 2, [lines 6-7], which
state, "our nation's dependency on oil produced by hostile
foreign nations". She urged care with that language because
Alaska's number one trading partner is Canada and with whom the
state has a great relationship. Also, she continued, the U.S.
will achieve energy independence this year for the first time
and that is also the outlook for the future.
1:58:27 PM
VICE CHAIR HAWKER opened public testimony on HJR 9, but closed
it after ascertaining no one wished to testify.
1:58:52 PM
VICE CHAIR HAWKER pointed out that HJR 9 already includes the
provision to distribute copies to all members of Congress. He
further noted there is no fiscal note associated with HJR 9.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON said that during consideration of HJR 10,
he observed a statement that only 250 people visited the Coastal
Plain on a yearly basis. It is pointed out that the beauty of
the Coastal Plain will be ruined, he added, but only 250 people
is not an onslaught of tourism.
VICE CHAIR HAWKER noted that there is only one small village in
the Coastal Plain designated as the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge. He said that that village probably does not have the
capacity to take more than one or two people at a time, so it is
not a tourist mecca. It is basically a saturated sponge and a
breeding ground for mosquitoes.
2:01:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON moved to report HJR 9 out of committee with
individual recommendations [and the accompanying zero fiscal
note]. There being no objection, HJR 9 was reported from the
House Resources Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 9 - Legislation.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 - Supporting Document - ANWR All Areas.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 10 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 10 HJR 10 Sponsor Statement |
| HJR010A.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| HJR 10 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 10 |
| Board of Fisheries - Maw #1.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Board Oil and Gas Conserv - Gallagher #1.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HJR 9 - Supporting Document - Economic Impact.pdf |
HRES 2/2/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 9 |