Legislature(2003 - 2004)
05/03/2004 09:06 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 5
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of
Alaska relating to initiative and referendum petitions.
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Wilken stated this bill, sponsored by Representative
Williams, "places before the voters a constitutional amendment that
changes the signature requirements for initiative and referendum
petitions."
TIM BARRY, Staff to Representative Bill Williams, testified that
currently, to place an initiative on the ballot, the Alaska State
Constitution requires signatures equal to ten-percent of voters who
voted in the most recent statewide general election from at least
27 of the 40 House districts. The amendment in this resolution
would change the requirement for placing an initiative on the
ballot. This resolution would require approval by a two-thirds plus
one vote of both bodies of the Alaska State Legislature and a
majority of the popular vote to bring the proposed amendment into
law.
Mr. Barry stated that this legislation is consistent with the
intent of the authors of the Alaska State Constitution, referencing
a document titled, "Additional Information for the Sponsor
Statement for HB 31/HJR 5: Initiative and Referendum Petitions"
[copy on file]. He stated that the authors of the Constitution
wanted to ensure that initiatives received "a measure of support"
throughout the State before being placed on the ballot. This
legislation would fulfill that goal by amending the Constitution to
reflect the current geographical distribution of the State of
Alaska.
Mr. Barry continued by referring to a report written by the
National Conference of State Legislatures titled "Constitution of
the State of Alaska"[copy on file], urging states to adopt
geographical distribution requirements for initiative petition
signatures such as that proposed by this resolution. He referred
to statistical data on signature petitions, included in the
"Initiative and Referendum Petitions" document. He proceeded to
testify as follows.
Of the ten initiatives that have been on the ballot since
1998, sponsors would have had to gather an average of 935
additional valid signatures to comply with this law. On these
ten petitions sponsors gathered an average of 40,148 total
signatures [when], in fact, the proposed legislation only
requires signature gatherers to get signatures from as few as
2.4 percent, and at the most, 6.4 percent of registered voters
in each district.
Senator Bunde asked if the proposed resolution would reduce the
overall number of signatures required to put an initiative on the
ballot.
Mr. Barry replied that this legislation would not change the total
number of signatures required statewide for an initiative, but
rather would require a greater number of signatures in each of the
districts.
Senator Bunde commented that although the election district he
represents is one with a high population concentration and
increasing growth, he supports this legislation. This resolution
would increase public confidence in government by giving Alaskans
assurance against paid petition gatherers soliciting signatures in
heavily populated areas of the State.
Co-Chair Wilken asked for a more thorough explanation of the
initiative requirements. He requested that Mr. Barry go over a
document titled "1997 Term Limits Pledge"[copy on file].
Mr. Barry explained, using the "1997 Term Limits Pledge" chart, the
current requirements to place an initiative on the ballot versus
the requirements of this resolution.
Senator Olson asked whether this legislation has received any
testimony in opposition or support from residents of rural Alaska.
Mr. Barry replied that a significant amount of testimony from rural
residents has been received in support of this bill. He could not
recall any opposition voiced from rural residents.
Senator Dyson spoke to the "unfortunate gradual shift" of political
power to urban areas. He expressed regret that the State Senate
districts were divided into geographical areas. He opposed the use
of professional petition signature gatherers for ballot
propositions. He supported this bill, particularly in relation to
issues affecting rural residents, as it would return some power to
rural areas.
Senator Dyson offered a motion to report the bill from Committee
with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal note.
There was no objection and HJR 5 MOVED from Committee with fiscal
note #1 for $1,500 from the Office of the Governor.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|