Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
02/12/2013 10:00 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR5 | |
| HB89 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 5 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HJR 5-OPPOSE GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SALMON
10:07:51 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 5, Opposing the United States Food
and Drug Administration's preliminary finding relating to
genetically engineered salmon; urging further examination of
genetically engineered salmon; opposing AquaBounty's petition to
produce genetically engineered salmon; and proposing, if
AquaBounty's petition is approved, that its product should be
labeled as "genetically modified."
10:08:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GERAN TARR, Alaska State Legislature, introduced
HJR 5 and said the application for the resolution has existed
for a number of years; however, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is now in the final stages of approval.
She stressed the urgency for this resolution, stating:
It's the first time that the FDA would approve, for
human consumption, a genetically modified organism
(GMO). So that really draws a line in the sand in
terms of application of this technology.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR directed attention to the committee packet
and the pictures provided of the two fish species from which
deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is used for genetically modified
organism (GMO) purposes. One is the ocean pout, an eel like
fish with a characteristic of continual growth; and the other is
Chinook salmon, known for its size and rapid growth. The
combined DNA from these two fish, into the genetic make-up of
the Atlantic salmon, produces what is often referred to as
Frankenfish; genetically engineered to produce growth hormones
for its entire life span, and to grow to maturity in half the
time of wild salmon. In December the FDA announced a finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) decision and opened the topic for
public comment, which are being accepted until 2/25/13. The
resolution is being introduced in conjunction with oppositional
comments that the FDA will be receiving from Alaska's governor
and congressional delegation. The concerns for this GMO product
include: threats to wild salmon stocks; risk to the state
economy; and risk to public health. Elaborating, she said that
the farmed Atlantic salmon pose an escapement threat, which is
backed by fishermen frequently reporting incidental catches of
pen reared Atlantic salmon originating in Washington State and
British Columbia, Canada. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Association (NOAA) recognize and acknowledge the risks posed,
and the associated effects on wild salmon stocks. The
genetically modified fish is more aggressive and predatory. The
possibility also exists for escaped GMO fish to crossbreed with
wild fish. Although promoted as sterile, studies indicate a
five percent reproduction rate, which, among other concerns,
threatens the ability for Alaska wild salmon marketers to ensure
confident labeling practices. Consumption of a GMO fish means
also consuming foreign DNA, along with growth hormones. The
risks to human health have not been determined by the FDA. Long
term safety testing has not been completed, posing unknown risks
among vulnerable populations, especially children and expectant
mothers. The economic risk may be negatively impacted, similar
to downward turn that occurred when farmed salmon were
introduced in the 1990s. Marketing efforts has created a
recognizable, trusted brand for Alaska Seafood and preservation
of consumer confidence is paramount for continued economic
stability. Part of the marketing campaign includes the health
benefits associated with salmon consumption. Consideration
should also be given to the fact that the fishing industry is
the second largest private sector employer in Alaska. Finally,
she said that HJR 5 is an opportunity to address FDA with a
unified voice to protect wild Alaska salmon. Representative
Tarr pointed out that many letters of support have been received
and made part of the committee packet. Additionally,
suggestions have been made regarding specific language, and will
be offered as amendments. On request she reviewed the three
potential amendments.
CHAIR SEATON opened public testimony.
10:18:31 AM
GERALD McCUNE, Lobbyist, Cordova District Fishermen United,
stated support for HJR 5 and the suggested amendments. He said
if the FDA goes ahead with the decision, the next step for
Alaska would be to ensure stipulations for appropriate product
labeling.
10:19:49 AM
JULIANNE CURRY, Executive Director, United Fishermen of Alaska
(UFA), stated support for HJR 5 and said the organization has a
long standing history of opposition to genetically modified
salmon.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked if similar concerns and opposition
to Frankenfish exists in other northwest states.
MS. CURRY said yes, and each round of consideration has brought
renewed opposition from numerous organizations on the federal
level.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON acknowledged that Alaska fishermen are
opposed to GMO fish, and asked what the stance is from the
environmental organizations.
MS. CURRY said that historically the environmentalist
organizations also take an oppositional stance to GMO
production.
10:22:36 AM
CHAIR SEATON closed public testimony.
10:23:00 AM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR named the organizations supporting the
resolution, which include: Alaska Glacier Seafoods,
International Seafoods of Alaska, Pickled Willies, United
Fishermen of Alaska, Petersburg Vessel Owners Association,
Alaska Trollers Association, Southeast Alaska Fishermen, Cordova
District Fishermen's United, and the City and Borough of
Yakutat.
10:24:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS moved to adopt conceptual
Amendment 1, which read [original punctuation provided]:
P. 1, Line 14 - cleaner [less polluted]
P. 3, Line 8 - must, [omit should]
P. 3, Line 8 - "Genetically Modified", as required by
Alaska law,
CHAIR SEATON seeing no objection announced Amendment 1, in three
parts, as adopted.
10:25:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON moved to report HJR 5, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHJR 5(FSH) was
reported from the House Special Committee on Fisheries.
10:26:35 AM
The committee took an at-ease from 10:26 a.m. to 10:29 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 5 Letter 6 Sea Beef.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Letter 7 Intl Seafoods of AK.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Letter 8 PVOA.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Memo.docx |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Parnell Letter.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR005A.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Article 1.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Impact Memo.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HB0089A.pdf |
HFSH 2/5/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 89 |
| HB 89 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 2/5/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 89 |
| HB 89 Aquatic Invasive Species Background Information.pdf |
HFSH 2/5/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 89 |
| PVOA_HJR 5_Support Comments(2).pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| UFA support HJR5 Genetically Modified Salmon Hse Fisheries 02.01.13.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| ATA Comments HJR 5 GE Salmon, 020113.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| ATA GMO Salmon Labeling Comment 1110.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| ge salmon letter 2013.doc |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Letter 1 Hamburg FDA GE Salmon FINAL.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Letter 2 Hamburg GE Salmon comment extension.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| ASGA HB 89 letter.docx |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 89 |
| HJR 5 Letter 3 Delegation Chenault HJR8.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Letter 4 Alaska Glacier Seafoods.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 Letter 5 Picked Willys.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 CDFU.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| HJR 5 SEAFA.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| 13.004 MOU Invasive Freshwater Aquatic Plants_State Agencies.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 89 |
| HJR 5 support letter Kim Elliott.docx |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |
| CDFU HB 89 Aquatic Invasive Sp.pdf |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 89 |
| HJR 5 House Fisheries presentation.pptx |
HFSH 2/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HJR 5 |