Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/24/2002 02:00 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HCR 27-LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION PROCEDURES
REPRESENTATIVE DREW SCALZI, bill sponsor, introduced the
legislation by stating the following:
The Local Boundary Commission (LBC) is charged with the
review of petitions seeking local boundary changes,
approval or denial of those petitions as submitted or
as the LBC sees fit to modify them.
What happened recently in my area is that the City of
Homer asked for an annexation petition that was very
excessive as to what was finally ratified and agreed to
by the LBC. In asking for 25 square miles of new
property, they were essentially more than doubling the
size of the community. They felt that it was up to the
LBC to make that determination. The LBC did so after
two years of very tense and contentious public
testimony. Having been involved in that, my attitude
was I'm glad we had a third independent party, which
was the LBC, to make that decision. However, it did
drag a lot of people through an unnecessary process
when this was excessive in nature. The City of Homer
finally was satisfied with a 4.5 mile are that the LBC
had modified it down to.
What this resolution asks is that the LBC adopt new
regulations that would allow them, early in the
process, to remit a petition that is significantly
deficient. If it was too excessive they could have a
hearing and they could find it was way out of line or
if it was too small and they would be able to send it
back to the city and say, do your homework again, we're
not going to do it for you. Nor are we going to drag
the public through an arduous process.
He said the LBC is in support of the resolution.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON called for testimony.
ABIGAIL FULLER testified in support of HCR 27. Although it
doesn't address all the concerns she has about the process of
changing boundaries, the LBC does need to be able to reject
petitions out of hand and send them back for revision when there
clearly is a problem. "This bill is a small step in the right
direction."
VI JERRELL, PhD. testified in support of HCR 27, which urges the
LBC to adopt standards and procedures to enable them to return a
petition when they determine the petition is substantially
deficient or in need of substantial supplementation.
PETE ROBERTS, President of the Citizens Concerned About
Annexation, testified in support of HCR 27. He believes that:
· Cities shouldn't be able to select the manner in which an
annexation is held. That decision should be made by the LBC.
· Major hearings should be held mid way through the process so
what is said at the hearing can have some affect on the
process.
· The LBC should set the regulations to use due process
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON agreed with the testifiers, it is a small
step, but this is a start in the right direction.
There was no further testimony.
He asked for the will of the committee.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to move HCR 27 and attached
fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations.
There being no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|