Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120
02/21/2026 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR22 | |
| HJR23 | |
| HB290|| HCR10 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HCR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 290-DELIVERY OF RESOLUTIONS
HCR 10-UNIFORM RULES: RESOLUTION DISTRIBUTION
4:27:30 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 290, "An Act relating to delivery of resolutions
by the governor" and HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10,
Proposing an amendment to the Uniform Rules of the Alaska State
Legislature relating to resolutions.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND, as prime sponsor of HB 290 and HCR 10,
said that the two actions together are about timely joint
resolutions. Currently, there are specific timeframes when
joint resolutions are fully transmitted and set in legislation.
Last year, resolutions about the fire season were transmitted in
the fall.
AYDEN NICHOL, staff, Representative Ky Holland, Alaska State
Legislature presented on HB 290 and HCR 10 on behalf of
Representative Holland, prime sponsor. He said this is a pair
of companion measures about the timely transmittals of joint
resolutions. All resolutions from last session were sent out on
an extreme delay such as the one that missed the fire season.
4:31:48 PM
MR. NICHOLS presented a PowerPoint, titled "HB 290 & HCR 10
Transmittal of Joint Resolutions," [hard copy included in the
committee file]. The current distribution process is reviewed
on slide 2. He stated there is no timeline set for these
resolutions. On slide 3, he outlined issues with the current
process. Delays are an issue as fall was the earliest date that
resolutions were distributed. A sectional analysis of HB 290
including 15 days for transmittal while in session and 20 days
outside of session was outlined on slide 4. On slide 5, showing
a sectional analysis of HCR 10, the resolution changes the
distribution to the Office of the Chief Clerk or Senate
Secretary's Office, with a timeline of within fifteen days of
the resolution being returned by the governor. Additionally,
the notification of the sponsor is required when a resolution is
distributed.
4:35:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked whether resolutions were hung up in
the Office of the Governor or the legislature.
MR. NICOLS replied there were delays in both the Office of the
Governor and the Office of the Lieutenant Governor.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked again about whether it was held up
in the legislature. He asked if the sponsor would be open to an
amendment that bills need to be transmitted out of the
legislature in a timely manner.
MR. NICOL replied that it would be a reasonable amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND replied that he would be happy to
investigate it. There was a great deal of difference in the
timeline. All the resolutions were released on July 16. The
amount of time spent in the executive office varied until the
resolutions were all released. He would investigate a timeline
to put into the initial transmittal.
4:38:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE commented about the separation of powers.
She remarked that resolutions are different from bills. She
asked whether legislative resolutions need to touch the
executive branch.
MR. NICOL replied that the office has sought an answer to that
question but has not received an answer.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked, "How do other states deal with
this?" It touches on the separation of powers. She explained
that she wants to protect the power of the legislature. She
expressed concerns about cutting out the Office of the
Lieutenant Governor.
MR. NICOL replied that the role of the lieutenant governor
wasn't clarified. He said the lieutenant governor is tasked
with many recordkeeping duties. The lieutenant governor thought
this change may ease the tension with the legislature. He noted
that the separation of powers is an important part.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether HCR 10 and any amendment to
the Uniform Rules must be taken up by a joint session and passed
by two-thirds of the legislature.
MR. NICOL confirmed it was by two-thirds of the legislature.
4:42:49 PM
CHAIR CARRICK said that she requested a bill be transmitted and
it wasn't transmitted for five months. She asked whether this
only relates to resolutions.
MR. NICOL replied that Chair Carrick raised an excellent point.
The scope of the measures is limited to resolutions. He said he
would discuss it with the bill sponsor.
4:44:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY said she was pleased to have this
information as she was unaware of this large gap. Her question
has to do with bills and resolutions. A bill must be looked at
legally and have conforming changes. She cautioned about the
timeline needed to have a legal review. She asked whether the
sponsor did not receive an explanation of why it takes so long
to get out.
MR. NICOL replied that the sponsor did not receive an
explanation from the Office of the Governor. The lieutenant
governor walked through the process with the sponsor's office.
The workload is heavy as many of these resolutions have large
numbers of recipients.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether this is the correct timeline.
MR. NICOL replied that this timeline was picked in part with the
constitutional timelines of bills. There was no input from the
Office of the Governor. Legislative Legal Services, the Office
of the Chief Clerk, and Senate Secretary's Office agreed that
the timeline was reasonable.
4:47:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked for a review of the differences
between a resolution, joint resolution and concurrent
resolution.
MR. NICOL replied that a joint resolution is most formal type of
resolution and can have the governor's signature. All other
resolutions go through the Legislative Affairs Agency which
falls to the Office of the Chief Clerk and the Senate
Secretary's Office.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked, "How does one decide which one
to use?"
MR. NICOL said an issue of national politics or constitution
that must be done through a joint resolution. Concurrent
resolutions are used to express concerns to the executive
office. House or Senate special resolution express the will of
one body.
4:50:51 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HB 290.
ED MARTIN, representing self, stated support for HB 290 and
commended Representative Holland for bringing forward the bill.
He thanked him for trying to fix the bureaucracy of the
legislature. Last year, he sent a letter to the House Judiciary
Standing Committee in mid-March with a sample resolution about
an investigation of Alaska's judiciary. He asked the committee
to refer to the letter.
4:53:33 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining there was no further testimony,
she closed public testimony on HB 290.
4:53:41 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HCR 10.
MR. MARTIN testified in support of HCR 10. He asked for
increased efficiency in the legislature.
4:54:35 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining there was no further testimony,
she closed public testimony on HCR 10.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND thanked fellow committee members for
their time considering HB 290 and HCR 10. He said he is looking
forward to the follow-up.
4:55:19 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced both HCR 10 and HB 290 were held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 22 Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |
| HJR 22 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |
| HJR 23 Version A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE-02-13-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Backup LRS Report Imbalance of Governors Initial Budget Requests FY 17-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR23 Support Documents - Presentation.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HB 290 Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sponsor Statement Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sectional Analysis Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 HCR 10 Slides STA.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Sponsor Statement Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Secitonal Analysis Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Backup Uniform Rule 49.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HB 290 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-02-20-2026.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HCR 10 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-2-20-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HJR 22 Presentation 2-21-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |