Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/05/2003 01:35 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HCR 2-EXTEND ALASKA RAILROAD TO FT. GREELY
CHAIR WAGONER asked Mary Jackson to introduce HCR 2.
MARY JACKSON, staff to Senator Wagoner, advised her explanation
was directed to \Q version of HCR 2. The revisions were made at
the request of the department and increase the viability of the
railroad line by recognizing economic factors other than just
the missile base. The first resolution remained the same, the
second added the Stryker Brigade, the third was new to reference
the Pogo Mine, the forth was new to recognize the agricultural
industry, the fifth was slightly revised, the sixth seventh and
eighth were unchanged. The title was changed to reflect the
changes and to include Delta Junction.
In response to the Chair's question regarding whether the
resolution indicated authorization for the project, the answer
is no. Statutes are clear that the railroad must get legislative
approval for any extension of their lines. The resolution is
straightforward and asks the railroad to look into extending
their lines. If they determine it is feasible, they would return
to the Legislature for action.
CHAIR WAGONER asked for questions.
SENATOR LINCOLN expressed appreciation for Ms. Jackson's review
because she had concerns with the first draft. She noted she had
not heard from the railroad regarding the CS, but previous
correspondence indicated that additional maintenance and
operation expense is a concern. She thought that was still a
valid concern.
CHAIR WAGONER asked for a motion to adopt the CS \Q version as
the working document.
SENATOR ELTON made a motion to adopt the \Q Utermohle 3/3/03
version as the working document. There being no objection it was
so ordered.
SENATOR LINCOLN said she had some question about the railroad
support.
MS. JACKSON advised the fiscal note was prepared by the railroad
and in it they noted there would be additional costs.
SENATOR LINCOLN interpreted the analysis section to mean the
fiscal impact is a concern. She expressed a desire to hear from
the railroad.
CHAIR WAGONER said he has spoken with the railroad and because
the fiscal note is zero he won't hold the resolution. The only
way there would be a fiscal note is if the Governor directs the
Legislature to proceed.
When the railroad is spending $32,000 per mile for operation and
maintenance, a line extension of 70 miles would nearly wipe out
their annual profit.
GENERAL PAT GAMBLE, President of the Alaska Railroad
Corporation, testified the railroad views the resolution as a
homework assignment. As Senator Lincoln says, they would begin
to study what is feasible and available in the near and long
term to be able to generate the revenue that would pay the
railroad operation and maintenance. If the Governor signs the
resolution, thereby tasking the railroad, they would begin the
process. To this point, they have had no in depth discussions
with businesses or the military regarding what the revenues
might be or how they might develop over time.
The generic route has been surveyed several times, but the next
step would be to determine the corridor itself. This is not a
right of way issue, it's just determining through which 500 feet
the route would be surveyed. This would allow them to identify
the number of bridges and the type of construction that would be
needed. With that information they could project the capital
costs for the 70 or 80 mile corridor.
The railroad is ready and willing to undertake the task if it
comes from the Governor.
SENATOR ELTON directed his attention to the last "WHEREAS" and
asked if the language was somewhat misleading because they don't
know whether or not the extension is consistent with the long-
term goals of the railroad.
GENERAL GAMBLE said the railroad's long-term goals, as stated in
their mission statement, are the community and economic
development responsibilities. This is consistent with their
mission.
There was no further testimony.
CHAIR WAGONER asked for a motion to move the resolution.
SENATOR GARY STEVENS made a motion to move SCS CSHCR 2 (CRA) \Q
version from committee with individual recommendations and zero
fiscal note.
There being no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|