Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/10/1996 02:05 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 542 BOARD OF FISH VOTING ETHICS
SENATOR TORGERSON introduced CSHB 542(FSH) as the next order of
business.
Number 465
REPRESENTATIVE ALAN AUSTERMAN, prime sponsor of HB 542, said he
introduced the legislation after a February meeting of past members
and the current chairman of the Board of Fisheries. The main issue
that came out of the two-day meeting was that there was a problem
with the conflict of interest in the Board of Fisheries and how it
was being handled. People were being conflicted off of the board,
decisions were not being made in some instances, and decisions were
being swayed in other instances because of the people being
conflicted off of the board.
Representative Austerman said HB 542 removes the attorney general
out of the picture, in that he does not give opinions any more
about the Board of Fisheries conflict of interest. The bill also
mandates that board members will discuss and vote on all issues
after declaring a conflict of interest. Board members will also
have to file a financial conflict of interest statement with the
APOC.
Representative Austerman said the basis of the legislation is to
get the Board of Fisheries back on track and have them make
decisions based upon the issues rather than being conflicted off.
Number 530
SENATOR ZHAROFF moved that an immediate effective date be added to
the legislation. Hearing no objection, the Chairman stated the
motion carried.
Number 557
STEVEN WHITE, Department of Law, stated the department has no
position on HB 542. He related that for the past six years he has
advised the Board of Fisheries and has helped them through
implementing the current Executive Ethics Act. He noted that if HB
542 passes, it will be the first time that any agency will be
exempted from the conflict of interest provisions of that Act.
TAPE 96-20, SIDE B
Number 001
Mr. White discussed and answered questions on the current process
for determining if board members have a conflict of interest. He
emphasized the department does not make the decisions for the
board; they help them work through the issues, but the board itself
makes the final determination.
In his closing comments, Mr. White said he understands that former
board chairmen don't like the Ethics Act and it's somewhat
understandable because it does add more to the board process.
However, under the current process, the lay character of the board
is preserved because the members who do have experience are allowed
to share that experience with the board; they're just not permitted
to vote or to persuade other persons. He also said the department
believes in the board process and the integrity of the board
process, and they don't want to see anything that would lead the
public to lose its confidence that there's total impartiality on
the board when they make their decisions.
Number 130
There being no further testimony on HB 542, SENATOR TORGERSON asked
for the will of the committee.
SENATOR ZHAROFF moved SCS CSHB 542(CRA) pass out of committee with
individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|